Conditional Traceability Clause Samples

Conditional Traceability. In our scheme, the participants (V , D and CC) choose random numbers α , β , r , r and Game G4: G4 is the final game in which by intercepting the messages ▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇, ▇▇ tries to compute the session key SKi,j = H7(riRj si,j PIDj Ti,j Tcc) with the help of calculation of the ephemeral secrets riRj, si,j, ▇▇∗ and Ci,j. To derive riRj, it is required to get the ephemeral secrets ri and rj. The ephemeral secrets ri and rj are randomly generated by the vehicle Vi and the drone Dj respectively. Therefore, even if knows ▇▇ and Rj, it is hard to calculate the private key. That is, needs to solve the CDH problem within a short run time t to compute the real session key SKi,j shared between Vi and Dj. Thus, we can get the following relationship: |Pr [SCG4 ] − Pr [SCG3 ]| ≤ AdvA (t). (6) At last, all the oracles are simulated by . The adversary is only left to guess the value of c for winning the game after querying Test(V α, Djβ) query. Thus, Pr[SCG ] has the generates dynamic timestamps Ti, Tj, Tcc, Ti,j to compute temporary ciphertext messages. So cannot trace the behavior of the participants, that is, our scheme could provide un- traceability. Besides, when the vehicle misbehaves, the CC can trace its real identity by analyzing its messages. Only CC can decrypt the real identity IDi of the vehicle by computing [IDi, DIDj, PIDj, Ti] = DR∗ (Ci). Therefore the condi- tional traceability of our proposed scheme is guaranteed.
View Source

Related to Conditional Traceability

  • Traceability 11.1 Under the terms of this Agreement, Supplier shall have and operate a process to ensure that all Products, sub-assemblies and the components contained therein supplied to the Buyer are completely Traceable back to manufacturer by batch or lot or date code. 11.2 Further Supplier hereby agrees, unless directed otherwise by the Buyer, to procure components through franchised distributors or direct component Suppliers. Supplier agrees to indemnify and hold the Buyer harmless from and against all costs and expenses for the removal, repair or replacement and reinstallation of counterfeit components incorporated into a Product sold by Supplier to the Buyer where the counterfeit component was procured by Supplier from a person or entity other than a franchised distributor or direct component Supplier or other person or entity pre-approved by the Buyer in writing.

  • Accessibility Supplier warrants that all Products will meet the requirements set forth in all federal, state, local and foreign laws, rules, and regulations applicable to accessibility of information technology for people with disabilities. Supplier agrees to use personnel trained and knowledgeable in supporting the needs of persons with disabilities in performance of Services under this Order.

  • Compatibility 1. Any unresolved issue arising from a mutual agreement procedure case otherwise within the scope of the arbitration process provided for in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall not be submitted to arbitration if the issue falls within the scope of a case with respect to which an arbitration panel or similar body has previously been set up in accordance with a bilateral or multilateral convention that provides for mandatory binding arbitration of unresolved issues arising from a mutual agreement procedure case. 2. Nothing in this Article and Articles 25A to 25G shall affect the fulfilment of wider obligations with respect to the arbitration of unresolved issues arising in the context of a mutual agreement procedure resulting from other conventions to which the Contracting States are or will become parties.”.

  • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Control The hospital in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) shall develop, establish and put into effect, musculoskeletal prevention and control measures, procedures, practices and training for the health and safety of employees.

  • Benchmarks for Measuring Accessibility For the purposes of this Agreement, the accessibility of online content and functionality will be measured according to the W3C’s Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA and the Web Accessibility Initiative Accessible Rich Internet Applications Suite (WAI-ARIA) 1.0 for web content, which are incorporated by reference.