Conduct of the Parties The parties will not engage in behaviour that is, or may reasonably be considered to be intimidating, bullying, or harassing or commit any act or behaviour which is offensive or abusive in connection with this Agreement.
Conduct of Logging Unless otherwise specifi- cally provided herein, Purchaser shall fell trees desig- nated for cutting and shall remove the portions that meet Utilization Standards, as provided in B2.2, prior to accep- tance of subdivision for completion of logging under B6.36. Forest Service may make exceptions for occa- sional trees inadvertently not cut or trees or pieces not removed for good reason, including possible damage to forest resources or gross economic impracticability at the time of removal of other timber. Logging shall be con- ducted in accordance with the following, unless C6.4 pro- visions set forth requirements to meet special or unusual logging conditions:
Conduct of the Business Each of the Company and Parent covenants and agrees that:
Conduct of Business The business of the Company and its Subsidiaries shall not be conducted in violation of any law, ordinance or regulation of any governmental entity, except where such violations would not result, either individually or in the aggregate, in a Material Adverse Effect.
Conduct of mediation In consultation with the mediator, the parties will determine a location, timetable and procedure for the mediation or, if the parties cannot agree on these matters within 7 Working Days of the appointment of the mediator these matters will be determined by the mediator.
Conduct of the Project C.1. The Proposer agrees to do the work set out in the Proposal in accordance with good standards relevant to such undertakings, and shall expend funds received hereunder only in accordance with such Proposal and the requirements of this Agreement.
Conduct of Mediation Sessions Mediation hearings will be conducted in an informal manner and discovery will not be allowed. The discussions, statements, writings and admissions will be confidential to the proceedings (pursuant to California Evidence Code sections 1115 through 1128) and will not be used for any other purpose unless otherwise agreed by the parties in writing. The parties may agree to exchange any information they deem necessary. Both parties shall have a representative attend the mediation who is authorized to settle the dispute, though City's recommendation of settlement may be subject to the approval of the Mayor and City Council. Either party may have attorneys, witnesses or experts present.
Conduct of the Study The Parties shall perform the Study set forth in Protocol No. [ ] dated [ ] (“Protocol”) in accordance with this Agreement, the Protocol and all applicable laws and regulations. The Institution shall follow all guidelines and instructions reasonably provided by Sponsor. [If applicable:] The Principal Investigator has, in addition to his/her Principal Investigator responsibilities, been appointed to coordinate certain activities at a national level as National Coordinating Investigator. It is the duty of the National Coordinating Investigator to obtain all approvals for the Study required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements from the relevant Independent Ethics Committee (“IEC”) before commencing the Study. The National Coordinating Investigator shall also, to the extent required pursuant to Norwegian law or regulatory requirements, notify and obtain the consent of the relevant EC of any amendments to the Protocol. Such approvals shall be forwarded to Sponsor as they are obtained.
Conduct of Hearings Hearings shall be conducted in accordance with the procedures contained in Government Code Section 11513. Hearing sessions shall be private with attendance limited to the panel, the parties’ representatives and witnesses as scheduled. In cases involving below-standard evaluations or disciplinary action, the District shall proceed first in providing evidence.
Conduct of Hearing a. The formal rules of evidence do not apply, although the presiding officer will have discretion to exclude evidence that is incompetent, irrelevant, or cumulative, or the presentation of which will otherwise consume undue time.
