Conflicting Requests. If the Indenture Trustee receives conflicting requests under Section 5.8(a)(ii) from two or more groups of Noteholders, each evidencing less than a majority of the Note Balance of the Controlling Class, the Indenture Trustee will take the action requested by the Noteholders representing the greatest percentage of the Note Balance, notwithstanding any other provision of this Indenture.
Conflicting Requests. In the event two or more nurses on the same unit and shift request the same period of time off and such requests are received by the Medical Center on the same date, the Medical Center will seek to accommodate the requests, but, in the event the scheduling will not permit, the Medical Center will notify the nurses of the unresolved conflict. The senior such nurse shall be given preference provided that (a) they request such seniority preference in writing no later than five (5) days after notification by the Medical Center of the unresolved conflict, and (b) they shall not be eligible to exercise such right of seniority if they exercised it during the preceding two (2) years.
Conflicting Requests. If the Covered Entity and some other person with whom MSRC has a contract both desire the same Resources or otherwise have conflicting requests, MSRC will immediately notify and consult with each of the respective incident commanders regarding the conflict. MSRC will continue to follow a first-come/first-served approach unless and until it receives timely non- conflicting directions from the incident commanders to redirect Resources or activities. If, after such notice and consultation the conflicting parties still do not agree, MSRC will follow the relevant FOSC(s)' non-conflicting directions, if any.
Conflicting Requests. Vacations shall be scheduled by the Employer considering the seniority and the wishes of the Employees concerned, and when there is a dispute as to the same choice of dates between two (2) or more employees, seniority shall govern.
Conflicting Requests. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person, the Requested State shall determine to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify the Requesting States of its decision.
2. In determining to which State a person is to be extradited, the Requested State shall have regard to all relevant circumstances and, in particular, to:
(a) if the requests relate to different offences - the relative seriousness of the offences;
(b) the time and place of commission of each offence;
(c) the respective dates of the requests;
(d) the nationality of the person;
(e) the ordinary place of residence of the person; and
(f) the possibility of any of the Requesting States extraditing the person to another State.
Conflicting Requests. If the extradition of a person is requested concurrently by one of the Parties and by other States, whether for the same or different offences, the requested Party shall take its decision on such requests and notify the requesting Party. In taking its decision, the requested Party shall take into account all circumstances, in particular the existence of a treaty or convention in support of the request, the relative gravity and location of the offences, the respective dates of the requests, the nationality of the person sought and the possibility of subsequent extradition to another State.
Conflicting Requests. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person either for the same offence or for different offences, the Requested Party shall determine to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify those States of its decision.
2. In determining to which State a person is to be extradited, the Requested Party shall have regard to all the relevant circumstances and, in particular, to:
(a) if the requests relate to different offences, the relative seriousness of those offences;
(b) the time and place of commission of each offence;
(c) the respective dates of the requests;
(d) the nationality of the person sought; and
(e) the ordinary place of residence of the person.
Conflicting Requests. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person, either for the same offence or for different offences, the Requested Party shall determine to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify those States of its decision.
Conflicting Requests. 1. Where requests are received from two or more States for the extradition of the same person, the Requested State shall determine to which of those States the person is to be extradited and shall notify the Requesting States of its decision.
2. In determining to which State a person is to be extradited, the Requested State shall have regard to all relevant circumstances and, in particular, to:
a. if the requests relate to different offences - the relative seriousness of the offences;
b. the time and place of commission of each offence;
c. the respective dates of the requests;
d. the nationality of the person; and
e. the ordinary place of residence of the person.
Conflicting Requests. If the requested State receives requests from the other Contracting State and from one or several third States for the extradition of the same person, whether for the same offence or for different offences, the requested State shall decide to which State the person shall be surrendered, taking into consideration all the relevant factors, including the following:
(a) Whether the requests were made pursuant to a treaty;
(b) The chronological order in which the requests were received by the requested State;
(c) The place where each offence was committed;
(d) The address of the person sought;
(e) The seriousness of each offence;
(f) The nationality of the person sought; and
(g) The possibility of subsequent extradition to another State.
