Contract Evaluation Sample Clauses

Contract Evaluation. The parties hereto agree that once each year, or more often if deemed necessary in the opinion of City, City or its designated representative shall complete a performance review concerning the performance of Lessee under this Agreement.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Contract Evaluation. Unless the criteria set forth in Article 11.07(F)(3) are met, evaluation of the Resident Educators shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the evaluation procedure contained in Article XI of this collective bargaining agreement and per applicable state laws.
Contract Evaluation. The Entry Year Program shall not replace employment evaluation. Evaluation of Entry Year teachers shall be conducted in accordance with the provisions of the evaluation procedure contained in Article V of this collective bargaining agreement and per applicable state laws.
Contract Evaluation. Contract evaluation considers three important aspects; the fleet size, composition issues and whether to accept long-term contracts. Based on those aspects: The shipping company has to evaluate whether it has sufficient fleet tonnage to fulfill the contract commitments together with its existing commitments, and if so, whether the contract is profitable (Xxxxxxxxxxxx et al. [8]). Thus, in order to check the contract’s profitability, assumption regarding the development of the future spot market (in a given time period) needs to be considered. A common strategy among the shipping companies is to prefer as large contract coverage as possible when low spot rates are anticipated. The distribution of contracts depends on the trade-off between customer relations and costs. [8] NorStone’s current shipping policy is based on a long-term evaluation of the ship-owners they cooperate with. Considering the present market, SPOT-contracts would be very profitable in the short run, due to low demand and favorable bunker rates. Quality in transportation, the ability to deliver within given terms, and benefits from long-term relationship is important factors that determine the distribution of contracts. NorStone strive to maintain their “best in class” philosophy and, in order to do so, they offer customer service at highest level by providing deliveries within one-three days. Maintaining this request is possible due to a heterogeneous fleet and a broad cooperation with various ship-owners. Altogether, 44 heterogeneous vessels distributed approximately
Contract Evaluation. At least once every 5 years, the chair of the GOVERNING BOARD shall appoint a committee of members of the GOVERNING BOARD to review and evaluate this contract. Such committee shall prepare either (1) a statement saying no amendments are necessary, (2) written amendments to this contract, or (3) a new contract, and present the same to the GOVERNING BOARD. The GOVERNING BOARD shall consider the matters presented by such committee and make the changes it deems appropriate to this contract.
Contract Evaluation. 1. Did the contractor meet the performance goals and/or provide deliverables in a timely manner?

Related to Contract Evaluation

  • Program Evaluation The School District and the College will develop a plan for the evaluation of the Dual Credit program to be completed each year. The evaluation will include, but is not limited to, disaggregated attendance and retention rates, GPA of high-school-credit-only courses and college courses, satisfactory progress in college courses, state assessment results, SAT/ACT, as applicable, TSIA readiness by grade level, and adequate progress toward the college-readiness of the students in the program. The School District commits to collecting longitudinal data as specified by the College, and making data and performance outcomes available to the College upon request. HB 1638 and SACSCOC require the collection of data points to be longitudinally captured by the School District, in collaboration with the College, will include, at minimum: student enrollment, GPA, retention, persistence, completion, transfer and scholarships. School District will provide parent contact and demographic information to the College upon request for targeted marketing of degree completion or workforce development information to parents of Students. School District agrees to obtain valid FERPA releases drafted to support the supply of such data if deemed required by counsel to either School District or the College. The College conducts and reports regular and ongoing evaluations of the Dual Credit program effectiveness and uses the results for continuous improvement.

  • PROGRESS EVALUATION Engineer shall, from time to time during the progress of the Engineering Services, confer with County at County’s election. Engineer shall prepare and present such information as may be pertinent and necessary, or as may be reasonably requested by County, in order for County to evaluate features of the Engineering Services. At the request of County or Engineer, conferences shall be provided at Engineer's office, the offices of County, or at other locations designated by County. When requested by County, such conferences shall also include evaluation of the Engineering Services. County may, from time to time, require Engineer to appear and provide information to the Xxxxxxxxxx County Commissioners Court. Should County determine that the progress in Engineering Services does not satisfy an applicable Work Authorization or any Supplemental Work Authorization related thereto, then County shall review same with Engineer to determine corrective action required. Engineer shall promptly advise County in writing of events which have or may have a significant impact upon the progress of the Engineering Services, including but not limited to the following:

  • TEACHER EVALUATION A. All monitoring or observation of the work performance of a teacher shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the teacher.

  • Annual Evaluation The Partnership will be evaluated on an annual basis through the use of the Strategic Partnership Annual Evaluation Format as specified in Appendix C of OSHA Instruction CSP 00-00-000, OSHA Strategic Partnership Program for Worker Safety and Health. The Choate Team will be responsible for gathering required participant data to evaluate and track the overall results and success of the Partnership. This data will be shared with OSHA. OSHA will be responsible for writing and submitting the annual evaluation.

  • Formal Evaluation All formal evaluations of personnel shall be conducted openly and with full knowledge of the employee concerned by an administrator or supervisor of the District.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.