Contradiction Clause Samples

A Contradiction clause defines how conflicts between different provisions within a contract are to be resolved. Typically, it establishes a hierarchy among the contract documents or specifies which provision will prevail if there is an inconsistency. For example, if the main agreement and an attached schedule contain conflicting terms, the clause may state that the main agreement takes precedence. This ensures clarity and prevents disputes by providing a clear method for resolving ambiguities or contradictions within the contract.
POPULAR SAMPLE Copied 97 times
Contradiction. In the event of any contradiction between a Contractor Schedule and another part of this Agreement, the other part will prevail.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Contradiction. This APA shall govern the subject matter thereof and supersedes the Agreement and the First Amendment in all respects and on the Closing Date the Agreement and the First Amendment shall be null and void with no further force and effect (except for the reference made herein).
View SourceView Similar (2)
Contradiction. In the event of a contradiction between a purchaser’s order and the Company’s subsequent Acknowledgement of that purchase order, the Acknowledgement shall take precedent.
View SourceView Similar (2)
Contradiction. Should any contradiction arise between the requirements in the LEP’s Constitution and this Partnership Agreement, the requirements of the LEP’s Constitution take precedence.
View SourceView Similar (3)
Contradiction. If there is any contradiction between this Subcontract and the Main Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall take precedence.
View Source
Contradiction. 11.1. If there is any contradiction between this Agreement and the Main Agreement, the terms and conditions of the Main Agreement shall take precedence to the extent of such contradiction.
View Source
Contradiction. Even though ▇▇▇▇▇▇ would have denied that he employed the use of the ontological argument, his critics claimed that he “…effectively resuscitated that argument in declaring necessity antecedently the cause, ground and foundation of God’s existence.”68 On the surface, it appears that ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ critics were correct in their assessment of his argument. ▇▇▇▇▇▇’▇ argument has two clear stages. The first stage proceeds as follows:
View Source
Contradiction. If there is any contradiction or conflict between this Guarantee and the Loan Agreement, the relevant provisions of the Loan Agreement shall prevail.
View Source
Contradiction. If any of the Security Principles contained in Schedule 9 (Security Principles) are in contradiction with any provision of any Security Document, the provision of the Security Document shall prevail. Clause 1.3 (Corporate benefit restrictions) shall apply.
View Source

Related to Contradiction

  • Inconsistency In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of the Schedule and the other provisions of this Master Agreement, the Schedule will prevail. In the event of any inconsistency between the provisions of any Confirmation and this Master Agreement (including the Schedule), such Confirmation will prevail for the purpose of the relevant Transaction.

  • Inconsistencies To the extent of any inconsistencies between the terms and conditions of this Amendment and the terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement, the terms and conditions of this Amendment shall prevail. All terms and conditions of the Loan Agreement not inconsistent herewith shall remain in full force and effect and are hereby ratified and confirmed by Borrowers.

  • Conflict or Inconsistency In the event of a conflict or inconsistency between the Additional Provisions and the provisions in Schedule “A”, the following rules will apply: (a) the Parties will interpret any Additional Provisions in so far as possible, in a way that preserves the intention of the Parties as expressed in Schedule “A”; and (b) where it is not possible to interpret the Additional Provisions in a way that is consistent with the provisions in Schedule “A”, the Additional Provisions will prevail over the provisions in Schedule “A” to the extent of the inconsistency.

  • Attachments, inconsistencies and severability This Consortium Agreement consists of this core text and Attachment 1 (Background included) Attachment 2 (Accession document) Attachment 3 (List of Third Parties for simplified transfer according to Section 8.2.2) Attachment 4 (Identified Affiliated Entities) In case the terms of this Consortium Agreement are in conflict with the terms of the Grant Agreement, the terms of the latter shall prevail. In case of conflicts between the attachments and the core text of this Consortium Agreement, the latter shall prevail. Should any provision of this Consortium Agreement become invalid, illegal or unenforceable, it shall not affect the validity of the remaining provisions of this Consortium Agreement. In such a case, the Parties concerned shall be entitled to request that a valid and practicable provision be negotiated which fulfils the purpose of the original provision.

  • Conflict To the extent any of the terms of this Amendment conflict with the terms of the Contract, the terms of this Amendment shall control.