Common use of Cooperation; Recovery Clause in Contracts

Cooperation; Recovery. OPIANT and AEGIS shall reasonably cooperate with each other in the planning and execution of any action under Sections 6.5.3 or 6.5.4. The Party controlling any such enforcement action shall not settle the action or otherwise consent to an adverse judgment in such action that diminishes the rights or interests of the non-controlling Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. Except as otherwise agreed to by the Parties as part of a cost-sharing arrangement, any recovery realized as a result of such litigation shall be first applied to the prorata reimbursement of any reasonable litigation expenses of OPIANT and AEGIS. Any remaining recovery realized from such litigation shall be treated as profits on sales of Products for purposes of determining Net Sales under this License Agreement, with AEGIS receiving the applicable royalty for purposes of Section 4.4 on such deemed Net Sales, and OPIANT receiving the remainder. For purposes of illustration, if the recovery under Sections 6.5.3 or 6.5.4 is One Hundred Million U.S. dollars (U.S. $100,000,000), after reimbursement of any reasonable litigation expenses, and OPIANT’s gross margin for the Product as determined for the most-recent Calendar Quarter completed prior to the initial infringing action was eighty percent (80%), then the Net Sales would be deemed to be One Hundred Twenty-Five Million U.S. dollars ($125,000,000) and such amount would be included in the next royalty report pursuant to Section 4.5.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: License Agreement (Indivior PLC), License Agreement (Indivior PLC), License Agreement (Opiant Pharmaceuticals, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Cooperation; Recovery. OPIANT Neurelis and AEGIS Aegis shall reasonably cooperate with each other in the planning and execution of any action under Sections 6.5.3 6.4.3 or 6.5.46.4.4. The Party controlling any such enforcement action shall not settle the action or otherwise consent to an adverse judgment in such action that diminishes the rights or interests of the non-controlling Party without the prior written consent of the other Party. Except as otherwise agreed to by the Parties as part of a cost-sharing arrangement, any recovery realized as a result of such litigation shall be first applied to the prorata reimbursement of any reasonable litigation expenses of OPIANT Neurelis and AEGISAegis. Any remaining recovery realized from such litigation shall be treated as profits on sales of Products for purposes of determining Net Sales under this License Agreement, with AEGIS Aegis receiving the applicable royalty for purposes of Section 4.4 on such deemed Net Sales, and OPIANT Neurelis receiving the remainder. For purposes of illustration, if the recovery under Sections 6.5.3 6.4.3 or 6.5.4 6.4.4 is One Hundred Million U.S. dollars (U.S. $100,000,000), after reimbursement of any reasonable litigation expenses, and OPIANT’s Neurelis’ gross margin for the Product as determined for the most-recent Calendar Quarter completed prior to the initial infringing action was eighty percent (80%), then the Net Sales would be deemed to be One Hundred Twenty-Five Million U.S. dollars ($125,000,000) and such amount would be included in the next royalty report pursuant to Section 4.5.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: License Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.