Common use of De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver Clause in Contracts

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability to pay] [,] with EPA with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claim, or cause of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability at the Site, e.g., a claim for contractual indemnification, add an exception for such claim such as the following: [The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply to Settling Party [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].] The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iii) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.]

Appears in 5 contracts

Samples: Settlement Agreement, www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability to pay] [,] with EPA with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claim, or cause of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability at the Site, e.g., a claim for contractual indemnification, add an exception for such claim such as the following: [The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply to Settling Party [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].] The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iii) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.] EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/CONTRIBUTION Except as provided in Paragraph 28 (Waiver of Claims by Settling Parties), nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to create any rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any person not a Party to this Settlement Agreement. Except as provided in Section X (Covenants by Settling Parties [and Settling Federal Agencies]), each of the Parties expressly reserves any and all rights (including, but not limited to, pursuant to Section 113 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613), defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action that it may have with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating in any way to the Site against any person not a Party hereto. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement diminishes the right of the United States, pursuant to Section 113(f)(2) and (3) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (f)(2)-(3), to pursue any such persons to obtain additional response costs or response action and to enter into settlements that give rise to contribution protection pursuant to Section 113(f)(2). The Parties agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9613(f)(2) and 9622(h)(4), and is entitled, as of the Effective Date, to protection from contribution actions or claims as provided by Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, or as may be otherwise provided by law, for the “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement. The “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement are Past Response Costs [if SFAs are making payments for Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs, insert: and Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs.]16 The Parties further agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Section 113(f)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(3)(B). Each Settling Party shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought by it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing no later than 60 days prior to the initiation of such suit or claim. Each Settling Party also shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought against it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing within 10 days after service of the complaint or claim upon it. In addition, each Settling Party shall notify EPA within 10 days after service or receipt of any Motion for Summary Judgment and within 10 days after receipt of any order from a court setting a case for trial, for matters related to this Settlement Agreement. In any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding initiated by EPA, or by the United States on behalf of EPA, for injunctive relief, recovery of response costs, or other relief relating to the Site, Settling Parties shall not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon the principles of waiver, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim-splitting, or other defenses based upon any contention that the claims raised in the subsequent proceeding were or should have been brought in the instant case; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph affects the enforceability of the Covenants by EPA set forth in Section VIII. Effective upon signature of this Settlement Agreement by a Settling Party, such Settling Party agrees that the time period commencing on the date of its signature and ending on the date EPA receives from such Settling Party the payment(s) required by Section VI (Payment of Response Costs) and, if any, Section VII (Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement) shall not be included in computing the running of any statute of limitations potentially applicable to any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed” as defined in Paragraph 30, and that, in any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed,” such Settling Party will not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon principles of statute of limitations, waiver, laches, estoppel, or other defense based on the passage of time during such period. If EPA gives notice to Settling Parties that it will not make this Settlement Agreement effective, the statute of limitations shall begin to run again commencing 90 days after the date such notice is sent by EPA. PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS [NOTE: This Section should be used if a Settling Party is a Site owner or otherwise controls access to the Site and access and/or use restrictions are needed. If access is needed to real property owned or controlled by a Settling Party, use Paragraph 35.a. If land, water, or other resource use restrictions are needed on real property owned or controlled by a Settling Party, use Paragraph 35.b. If EPA has issued a record of decision or an action memorandum that provides for institutional controls (ICs) on real property owned by a Settling Party, then relevant provisions from the remedial design/remedial action consent decree or the removal administrative settlement agreement and order on consent, as appropriate, relating to ICs implementation, plan review and approval, payment of future oversight costs, dispute resolution, etc., may be needed and should be adapted for use in this model. Additional changes to this section of the model will be needed in the event that access or land, water, or other resource use restrictions are needed on or affect a federal facility.] Agreements Regarding Access and Non-Interference. Owner Settling Party shall, with respect to its Affected Property: Provide the United States [, the State,] potentially responsible parties who have entered or may enter into an agreement with the United States [or the State] for performance of response actions at the Site (hereinafter “Performing Parties”), and their representatives, contractors, and subcontractors with access at all reasonable times to its Affected Property to conduct any activity relating to response actions at the Site including the following activities: [NOTE: Augment this list as appropriate.] Verifying any data or information submitted to the United States [or the State]; Conducting investigations regarding contamination at or near the Site; Obtaining samples; Assessing the need for, planning, implementing, or monitoring response actions; Inspecting and copying records, operating logs, contracts, or other documents maintained or generated by Owner Settling Party or its agents, consistent with Section XII (Access to Information); Assessing Owner Settling Party’s compliance with the Settlement Agreement; Determining whether the Affected Property is being used in a manner that is prohibited or restricted, or that may need to be prohibited or restricted under the Settlement Agreement; and Implementing, monitoring, maintaining, reporting on, and enforcing [any institutional controls or] any land, water, or other resource use restrictions regarding the Affected Property. Refrain from using its Affected Property in any manner that EPA determines will (i) pose an unacceptable risk to human health or to the environment due to exposure to hazardous substances or (ii) interfere with or adversely affect the implementation, integrity, or protectiveness of response actions at the Site, including the following restrictions: [NOTE: Customize and augment this list as appropriate. Be as specific as possible.] Prohibiting the following activities which could interfere with response actions at the Site: ______; Prohibiting use of contaminated groundwater; Prohibiting the following activities which could result in exposure to contaminants in subsurface soils and groundwater:______; Ensuring that any new structures on the Affected Property will not be constructed in the following manner which could interfere with response actions at the Site: ______; and Ensuring that any new structures on the Affected Property will be constructed in the following manner which will minimize potential risk of inhalation of contaminants:______. If EPA determines in a decision document prepared in accordance with the NCP that institutional controls in the form of state or local laws, regulations, ordinances, zoning restrictions, or other governmental controls or notices are needed regarding the Affected Property, Owner Settling Party shall cooperate with EPA’s [and the State’s] efforts to secure and ensure compliance with such institutional controls. Notice to Successors-in-Title

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability to pay] [,] with EPA with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] ]. The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claim, or cause of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability at the Site, e.g., a claim for contractual indemnification, add an exception for such claim such as the following: [The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply to Settling Party [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].] The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iii) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.]

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability to pay] [,] with EPA with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] ]. The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claim, or cause of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability at the Site, e.g., a claim for contractual indemnification, add an exception for such claim such as the following: [The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply to Settling Party [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].] The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iii) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.] EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/CONTRIBUTION Except as provided in Paragraph 28 (Waiver of Claims by Settling Parties), nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to create any rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any person not a Party to this Settlement Agreement. Except as provided in Section X (Covenants by Settling Parties [and Settling Federal Agencies]), each of the Parties expressly reserves any and all rights (including, but not limited to, pursuant to Section 113 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613), defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action that it may have with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating in any way to the Site against any person not a Party hereto. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement diminishes the right of the United States, pursuant to Section 113(f)(2) and (3) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (f)(2)-(3), to pursue any such persons to obtain additional response costs or response action and to enter into settlements that give rise to contribution protection pursuant to Section 113(f)(2). The Parties agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9613(f)(2) and 9622(h)(4), and is entitled, as of the Effective Date, to protection from contribution actions or claims as provided by Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, or as may be otherwise provided by law, for the “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement. The “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement are Past Response Costs [if SFAs are making payments for Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs, insert: and Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs.]16 The Parties further agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Section 113(f)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(3)(B). Each Settling Party shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought by it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing no later than 60 days prior to the initiation of such suit or claim. Each Settling Party also shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought against it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing within 10 days after service of the complaint or claim upon it. In addition, each Settling Party shall notify EPA within 10 days after service or receipt of any Motion for Summary Judgment and within 10 days after receipt of any order from a court setting a case for trial, for matters related to this Settlement Agreement. In any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding initiated by EPA, or by the United States on behalf of EPA, for injunctive relief, recovery of response costs, or other relief relating to the Site, Settling Parties shall not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon the principles of waiver, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim-splitting, or other defenses based upon any contention that the claims raised in the subsequent proceeding were or should have been brought in the instant case; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph affects the enforceability of the Covenants by EPA set forth in Section VIII. Effective upon signature of this Settlement Agreement by a Settling Party, such Settling Party agrees that the time period commencing on the date of its signature and ending on the date EPA receives from such Settling Party the payment(s) required by Section VI (Payment of Response Costs) and, if any, Section VII (Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement) shall not be included in computing the running of any statute of limitations potentially applicable to any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed” as defined in Paragraph 30, and that, in any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed,” such Settling Party will not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon principles of statute of limitations, waiver, laches, estoppel, or other defense based on the passage of time during such period. If EPA gives notice to Settling Parties that it will not make this Settlement Agreement effective, the statute of limitations shall begin to run again commencing 90 days after the date such notice is sent by EPA. PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS [NOTE: This Section should be used if a Settling Party is a Site owner or otherwise controls access to the Site and access and/or use restrictions are needed. If access is needed to real property owned or controlled by a Settling Party, use Paragraph 35.a. If land, water, or other resource use restrictions are needed on real property owned or controlled by a Settling Party, use Paragraph 35.b. If EPA has issued a record of decision or an action memorandum that provides for institutional controls (ICs) on real property owned by a Settling Party, then relevant provisions from the remedial design/remedial action consent decree or the removal administrative settlement agreement and order on consent, as appropriate, relating to ICs implementation, plan review and approval, payment of future oversight costs, dispute resolution, etc., may be needed and should be adapted for use in this model. Additional changes to this section of the model will be needed in the event that access or land, water, or other resource use restrictions are needed on or affect a federal facility.]

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs Respondents shall not assert any claims and waive all claims or causes of action (including claims or causes of action under sections 107(a) and 113 of CERCLA) that they may have against any third party who enters or has entered into a de minimis or “ability-to-pay” settlement with EPA to the extent Respondents’ claims and causes of action are within the scope of the matters addressed in the third party’s settlement with EPA, provided, however, that this waiver does not apply if the third party asserts a claim or cause of action regarding the Site against the Respondents. Nothing in this Settlement limits Respondents’ rights under section 122(d)(2) of CERCLA to comment on any de minimis or ability-to-pay settlement proposed by EPA. De Micromis Waiver. Respondents shall not assert any claims and waive all claims or causes of action (including claims or causes of action under sections 107(a) and 113 of CERCLA) that they may have for all matters relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in where the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability person’s liability to pay] [,] with EPA Respondents with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claimSite is based solely on having arranged for disposal or treatment, or cause for transport for disposal or treatment, of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability hazardous substances at the Site, e.g.or having accepted for transport for disposal or treatment of hazardous substances at the Site, a claim for contractual indemnificationif all or part of the disposal, add an exception for treatment, or transport occurred before April 1, 2001, and the total amount of material containing hazardous substances contributed by such claim such as person to the following: Site was less than [The waiver[s110] under this Paragraph 28 shall not apply to Settling Party gallons of liquid materials or [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].200] The pounds of solid materials. This waiver under Paragraph 28.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall does not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (ia) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (iib) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section under sections 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) CERCLA or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927RCRA with respect to the Site, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iiic) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The This waiver under Paragraph 28.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall does not apply with respect to any claim defense, claim, or cause of action that a Respondent may have against any person otherwise covered by such this waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site by against such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.]Respondent. MSW Waiver

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

De Minimis/Ability to Pay Waiver. For response costs relating to the Site against any person that has entered [or in the future enters] into [a final CERCLA Section 122(g) de minimis settlement] [, or] [a final settlement based on limited ability to pay] [,] with EPA with respect to the Site.] Exceptions to Waiver[s] The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 27 shall not apply with respect to any defense, claim, or cause of action that a Settling Party may have against any person otherwise covered by such waiver[s] if such person asserts a claim or cause of action relating to the Site against such Settling Party. [NOTE: If a Settling Party asserts that it has a claim against a PRP within the scope of the waiver[s] that is unrelated to the PRP’s CERCLA liability at the Site, e.g., a claim for contractual indemnification, add an exception for such claim such as the following: [The waiver[s] under this Paragraph 28 27 shall not apply to Settling Party [insert name]’s contractual indemnification claim against [insert name].] The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(127.a(1) (De Micromis Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing hazardous substances contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site; or if (iii) such person has been convicted of a criminal violation for the conduct to which the waiver would apply and that conviction has not been vitiated on appeal or otherwise. [The waiver under Paragraph 28.a(227.a(2) (MSW Waiver) shall not apply to any claim or cause of action against any person otherwise covered by such waiver if EPA determines that: (i) the materials containing MSW contributed to the Site by such person contributed significantly or could contribute significantly, either individually or in the aggregate, to the cost of the response action or natural resource restoration at the Site; or (ii) such person has failed to comply with any information request or administrative subpoena issued pursuant to Section 104(e) or 122(e)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9604(e) or 9622(e)(3)(B), or Section 3007 of RCRA, 42 U.S.C. § 6927, or has impeded or is impeding, through action or inaction, the performance of a response action or natural resource restoration with respect to the Site.] EFFECT OF SETTLEMENT/CONTRIBUTION Except as provided in Paragraph 27 (Waiver of Claims by Settling Parties), nothing in this Settlement Agreement shall be construed to create any rights in, or grant any cause of action to, any person not a Party to this Settlement Agreement. Except as provided in Section X (Covenants by Settling Parties [and Settling Federal Agencies]), each of the Parties expressly reserves any and all rights (including, but not limited to, pursuant to Section 113 of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613), defenses, claims, demands, and causes of action that it may have with respect to any matter, transaction, or occurrence relating in any way to the Site against any person not a Party hereto. Nothing in this Settlement Agreement diminishes the right of the United States, pursuant to Section 113(f)(2) and (3) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613 (f)(2)-(3), to pursue any such persons to obtain additional response costs or response action and to enter into settlements that give rise to contribution protection pursuant to Section 113(f)(2). The Parties agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. §§ 9613(f)(2) and 9622(h)(4), and is entitled, as of the Effective Date, to protection from contribution actions or claims as provided by Sections 113(f)(2) and 122(h)(4) of CERCLA, or as may be otherwise provided by law, for the “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement. The “matters addressed” in this Settlement Agreement are Past Response Costs [if SFAs are making payments for Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs, insert: and Settling Parties’ Past Response Costs.]16 The Parties further agree that this Settlement Agreement constitutes an administrative settlement pursuant to which each Settling Party [if SFAs, insert: and each Settling Federal Agency] has, as of the Effective Date, resolved liability to the United States within the meaning of Section 113(f)(3)(B) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. § 9613(f)(3)(B). Each Settling Party shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought by it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing no later than 60 days prior to the initiation of such suit or claim. Each Settling Party also shall, with respect to any suit or claim brought against it for matters related to this Settlement Agreement, notify EPA in writing within 10 days after service of the complaint or claim upon it. In addition, each Settling Party shall notify EPA within 10 days after service or receipt of any Motion for Summary Judgment and within 10 days after receipt of any order from a court setting a case for trial, for matters related to this Settlement Agreement. In any subsequent administrative or judicial proceeding initiated by EPA, or by the United States on behalf of EPA, for injunctive relief, recovery of response costs, or other relief relating to the Site, Settling Parties shall not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon the principles of waiver, res judicata, collateral estoppel, issue preclusion, claim-splitting, or other defenses based upon any contention that the claims raised in the subsequent proceeding were or should have been brought in the instant case; provided, however, that nothing in this Paragraph affects the enforceability of the Covenants by EPA set forth in Section VIII. Effective upon signature of this Settlement Agreement by a Settling Party, such Settling Party agrees that the time period commencing on the date of its signature and ending on the date EPA receives from such Settling Party the payment(s) required by Section VI (Payment of Response Costs) and, if any, Section VII (Failure to Comply with Settlement Agreement) shall not be included in computing the running of any statute of limitations potentially applicable to any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed” as defined in Paragraph 29, and that, in any action brought by the United States related to the “matters addressed,” such Settling Party will not assert, and may not maintain, any defense or claim based upon principles of statute of limitations, waiver, laches, estoppel, or other defense based on the passage of time during such period. If EPA gives notice to Settling Parties that it will not make this Settlement Agreement effective, the statute of limitations shall begin to run again commencing 90 days after the date such notice is sent by EPA. PROPERTY REQUIREMENTS

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: www.epa.gov, www.epa.gov

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.