Design Recommendations Sample Clauses

Design Recommendations. The CM shall make recommendations to the Owner and Designer with respect to constructability, construction cost, sequence of construction, construction duration, possible means and methods of construction, time for construction, and separation of the Project contracts for various categories of Work. In addition, the CM shall give to the Designer all data of which it or the Owner is aware concerning patents or copyrights for inclusion in Contract Documents.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Design Recommendations. 4.5.1 General design principles‌ The visualization concepts were discussed in the two focus groups with the purpose of under- standing user needs as well as eliciting general design principles for music visualizations in a symphonic concert setting. In this section we summarize the tentative design principles that were derived from the focus group discussions. Fig. 12 summarises this information. An important element for future studies is the surprise factor. Participants in focus group 2 have demonstrated the need to be surprised during the music: (fg2#6, “I voted this the worst. It is related with what I said before, as a musician, sometimes I don’t want to see what comes next. It’s kind of spoiling a movie. Well, sometimes I would like to. But this does not give much information”, structure). However, on the other hand they expressed a need to get an overview of what is coming up (fg2#4, “It would be better if you can see what comes next, because expectation makes you to get catched”). For this participant, engagement is a function of his awareness of what comes next. In that case, there is a risk of a spoiler effect, as argued by fg2#6. A trade-off between attracting attention towards specific elements in the piece versus over- stimulation was identified, for which timing seems to play a major role: (fg#6, “It doesn’t tell to what you need to pay attention. You can see that the kettledrum goes wild, but not a second in advance”, “Look what’s about to happen”, orchestra layout), (fg#7, “There is only one thing there, so that’s what you start to pay attention to. It’s the pink elephant effect”, reduced piano roll).‌
Design Recommendations. Consider the impacts of transient encampments on urban roadsides with regard to functional design solutions, visual surveillance, and maintenance regimes. • Consider the long-term ecological and biological impact of plant species and spacing choices to ensure the functional, operational, environmental, and visual goals---such as quick canopy coverage and rapid cover of the ground. • When design functions permit, plant trees, as these are the best performing plant material over time. Where functional and aesthetic conditions permit, specify shrub communities under trees. • Continue to research and specify low- and densely growing ground cover plants that establish quickly, compete with invasive weeds, withstand drought conditions, and tolerate periodic mowing. • Ensure that construction contractors and maintenance crews understand and strictly abide by plant installation “planting windows” and effective herbicide application times.
Design Recommendations. Shall include a description of the project; a site description; geologic conditions; a summary of field explorations, laboratory testing and design recommendations.
Design Recommendations. The Construction Manager shall make recommendations to the Owner and Architect with respect to constructability, construction cost, and sequence of construction, construction duration, possible means and methods of construction, time for construction and separation of the Project into contracts for various categories of the Work.
Design Recommendations. The compromise proposed by Central Highlands of a 35-foot building setback and a 25-foot vegetative buffer along SR 305 is in compliance with both the BIMC and the Design for Bainbridge Manual, and is accepted by the City. The proposed traffic flow through adjacent commercial parking lots, which is allowed by the BIMC and consistent with the Visconsi Master Plan, is deemed acceptable by the City. If Central Highlands corrects the remaining five deficiencies noted on the recommendations page of the Design for Bainbridge Worksheet dated June 21, 2021, then the Project will satisfy the 23 Design Standards in the Design for Bainbridge Manual.
Design Recommendations. The results of the data review, the Consultant’s discussions with the Authority’s personnel, site observations and data from the subsurface explorations will be used to develop a theory regarding the pipeline settlement. The Consultant will prepare a brief report to the Authority describing our opinion on the settlement cause(s) and with recommendations for installing the by-pass piping to avoid the settlement issue. The Consultant shall submit report and conceptual design recommendations to the Authority and meet to discuss the report and recommendations. After this meeting, the Consultant will adjust the recommendations to incorporate the Authority’s comments. The Consultant will then work with the Authority to incorporate the final installation recommendations into the by-pass piping plans and specifications.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Design Recommendations

  • Conclusion and Recommendations D. Evaluations for Offenders without a sex offense conviction shall answer the following additional referral questions in the evaluations:

  • Conclusions and Recommendations For the reasons stated herein, Merrimack Energy concludes that the shortlisting decisions by PG&E in the 2007 RPS RFO were reasonable and based on the requirements and evaluation criteria set forth in the Solicitation Protocol. The selection of the shortlist was very inclusive and erred on the side of including more offers in what was a very ample shortlist relative to the procurement target. In the Shortlist Report, Merrimack Energy recommended a number of changes to the RPS procurement process, several of which were adopted by PG&E in the 2008 RPS RFO. Despite recommending certain changes, our assessment is that the PG&E evaluation methodology was appropriate and that it was administered fairly and reasonably. Consistent with suggestions we had made in and after the Shortlist Report, PG&E developed a negotiation prioritization strategy with shortlisted bidders that created an active group of negotiations based on price and viability factors. The Mojave Solar bid was consistently placed in the secondary group and although its proposal changed over time from the proposal initially shortlisted, it remained in the secondary group during the course of contract negotiations. While the project sponsor is a very viable and experienced developer of solar thermal projects and is capable of developing the project effectively, there are concerns associated with the timing of the project that adds risk to the ultimate success of the project. PG&E has done an effective job in managing these risks through contract provisions in both the original contract and the amended and restated agreement. The details of the PPA and the amended and restated agreement are addressed in the Confidential Appendix to this report. While the positive attributes of the project should be balanced against the negative attributes in assessing whether or not the amended and restated agreement should be approved, the IE has concerns about project value for the customers. In addition to the high project cost and low market value, the project contains a number of challenges to meet its proposed construction start date primarily associated with transmission interconnection and access. While PG&E has negotiated provisions in the Amended and Restated contract that generally protects the interests of consumers, should the firm interconnection be delayed longer than anticipated, PG&E customers may be exposed to higher RA costs to back-up the project should the cost of capacity in the market exceed the price caps established in the contract. In conclusion, the IE has reservations about the contract based on project value including the levelized net market value calculations relative to project benchmarks from other recent solicitations. PG&E Gas and Electric Advice Filing List General Order 96-B, Section IV AT&T Dept of General Services Northern California Power Association Xxxxxxxx & Xxxx LLP Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Occidental Energy Marketing, Inc. Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxx & Brand OnGrid Solar Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxx Xxxx Energy Praxair Arizona Public Service Company Economic Sciences Corporation X. X. Xxxx & Associates XXXX Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxx & Xxxxxx LLP RCS, Inc. Xxxxxxxxx & Xxx, Inc. Xxxxxx Farms Recurrent Energy Xxxxxx Xxxxx Associates X. X. Xxxxxx & Assoc. SCD Energy Solutions Bloomberg GLJ Publications SCE Bloomberg New Energy Finance GenOn Energy, Inc. SMUD Boston Properties Goodin, MacBride, Xxxxxx, Xxxxxxx & Xxxxxxx XXXXX Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx XxXxxxxxxx, P.C. Green Power Institute San Francisco Public Utilities Commission Brookfield Renewable Power Xxxxx & Xxxxxx Seattle City Light CA Bldg Industry Association Hitachi Sempra Utilities CLECA Law Office In House Energy Sierra Pacific Power Company CSC Energy Services International Power Technology Silicon Valley Power California Cotton Ginners & Growers Assn Intestate Gas Services, Inc. Silo Energy LLC California Energy Commission Xxxxxxxx Berkeley National Lab Southern California Edison Company California League of Food Processors Los Angeles Dept of Water & Power Spark Energy, L.P. California Public Utilities Commission Xxxx, Forward, Xxxxxxxx & Scripps LLP Sun Light & Power Calpine MAC Lighting Consulting Sunshine Design Cardinal Cogen MBMC, Inc. Xxxxxxxxxx, Xxxxxx & Xxxxxxx Xxxxxx, Xxxxx XXX & Associates Tabors Caramanis & Associates Xxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Tecogen, Inc. City of Palo Alto XxXxxxxx & Associates Tiger Natural Gas, Inc. City of Palo Alto Utilities Merced Irrigation District TransCanada City of San Xxxx Xxxxxxx Irrigation District Turlock Irrigation District Clean Energy Fuels Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx United Cogen Coast Economic Consulting Xxxxxxxx & Xxxxxxxx Utility Cost Management Commercial Energy NLine Energy, Inc. Utility Specialists Consumer Federation of California NRG West Verizon Crossborder Energy NaturEner Wellhead Electric Company Xxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx LLP Navigant Consulting Western Manufactured Housing Communities Association (WMA) Day Xxxxxx Xxxxxx Xxxxxx & Xxxx Associates eMeter Corporation Defense Energy Support Center North America Power Partners

  • Representations and Recommendations Unless otherwise stated in writing, neither Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc, nor its brokers or licensees have made, on their own behalf, any representations or warranties, express or implied, with respect to any element of the Property including but not limited to, the legal sufficiency, legal effect, or tax consequences of this transaction. Any information furnished by either party should be independently verified before that party relies on such information. Xxxxxxxx Realty Inc. recommends that Buyer consult its attorneys and accountants before signing this Agreement regarding the terms and conditions herein and that Seller satisfy itself as to the financial ability of Buyer to perform.

  • Design Changes Axon may make design changes to any Axon Device or Service without notifying Agency or making the same change to Axon Devices and Services previously purchased by Agency.

  • JOINT SETTLEMENT RECOMMENDATION 2. Staff conducted an investigation of the Respondent’s activities. The investigation disclosed that the Respondent had engaged in activity for which the Respondent could be penalized on the exercise of the discretion of the Hearing Panel pursuant to s. 24.1 of By-law No. 1.

  • Schematic Design Documents In accordance with the approved Preliminary Design and Construction Schedule and based upon approval of and comments made by the Owner regarding the Concept Design Studies, the Design Professional shall prepare and submit to the Owner Schematic Design Documents, including drawings and outline specifications. These documents shall represent a further development of the approved design concept, providing additional detail and specificity regarding the intended design solution. Typically, all such documents shall be drawn to scale, indicating materials and assemblies, as appropriate, to convey the design intent and to illustrate the Project’s basic elements, scale and relationship to the Site. All major pieces of furniture and equipment to be fixed or supplied by the CM/GC shall be illustrated to scale. (See ASTM Standard Practice E 1804-02, August 2007, Sections 6.3, 8.2 and 8.3 for guidance on information which is generally developed in Schematic Design.)

  • REGULATORY FILINGS AND CAISO TARIFF COMPLIANCE 3.1 Filing

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!