Determination of EBITDA. (a) The 2009 EBITDA, the 2010 EBITDA, the 2011 EBITDA and, if applicable, the 2012 EBITDA shall be determined on or before the thirtieth (30th) day following the receipt by Buyer, of the final audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, for Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2010, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2012, as applicable, and in any event no later than March 31 of 2010, 2011, 2012 or 2013, as applicable; provided that if the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA is disputed pursuant to this Section 2.5, such determination shall occur on such later date as the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable, shall have been finally determined hereunder (the date described in this sentence, the “Determination Date”). (b) No later than ten (10) business days following issuance of the audited financial statements of the Company for Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2010, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2012, as applicable, the Company shall deliver a copy thereof to the Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative, together with a certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, which certificate shall set forth the Company’s calculation of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. Time is of the essence with respect to the delivery of such certificate. (c) If the Buyer or the Sellers’ Representative shall disagree with such determination of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable, the disagreeing party shall notify the other party on or before the date which is thirty (30) days after the date on which the Company delivers to the Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative such statement of the Company’s 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative shall attempt in good faith to resolve any such disagreements. If Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative are unable to resolve all such disagreements on or before the date which is fifteen (15) days after notification by the disagreeing party of any such disagreements, the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer shall retain a nationally or regionally recognized independent public accounting firm not engaged by either the Company, Buyer or Parent at such time upon whom the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer shall mutually agree (such accounting firm being referred to as the “Final Accounting Firm”), to resolve all such disagreements. If Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative are unable to agree on the choice of an accounting firm, then Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative shall select a nationally or regionally recognized accounting firm by lot (after each submits a list of five names, excluding their respective regular outside accounting firms), which firm shall be the “Final Accounting Firm.” The Final Accounting Firm shall adjudicate only those items still in dispute with respect to the calculation of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. The determination by the Final Accounting Firm shall be binding and conclusive on both the Sellers and Buyer. (d) The Final Accounting Firm shall offer the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer the opportunity to provide written submissions regarding their positions on the disputed matters, which written submissions shall be provided to the Final Accounting Firm, if at all, no later than ten (10) days after the date of referral of the disputed matters to the Final Accounting Firm. The Final Accounting Firm shall deliver a written report resolving only the disputed matters and setting forth the basis for such resolution within thirty (30) days after the date of referral of the disputed matters to the Final Accounting Firm. The determination of the Final Accounting Firm with respect to the correctness of each matter in dispute shall be final and binding on the parties. The fees, costs and expenses of the Final Accounting Firm shall be borne entirely by the Buyer, if all the disputed matters are resolved in favor of the Sellers and by the Sellers, if all the disputed matters are resolved in favor of the Buyer. Otherwise, the fees, costs and expenses of the Final Accounting Firm shall be allocated between the Buyer, on the one hand, and the Sellers, on the other hand, based upon the percentage which the portion of the contested amount not awarded to each party bears to the amount actually contested by such party. For example, if the Sellers’ Representative claims that the 2010 EBITDA is $1,000 greater than the amount determined by the Company, and the Buyer contests only $500 of the amount claimed by the Sellers’ Representative, and if the Final Accounting Firm ultimately resolves the dispute by awarding the Sellers’ Representative $300 of the $500 contested amount, then the costs and expenses of the Final Accounting will be allocated 60% (i.e., 300 ÷ 500) to the Buyer and 40% (i.e., 200 ÷ 500) to the Sellers. The Final Accounting Firm shall conduct its determination activities in a manner wherein all materials submitted to it are held in confidence and shall not be disclosed to third parties. The parties hereto agree that judgment may be entered upon the determination of the Final Accounting Firm in any court having jurisdiction over the party against which such determination is to be enforced. (e) The dispute resolution provisions of this Section 2.5 shall not apply to, and the scope of the Final Accounting Firm’s authority herein shall not extend to, any dispute of the Parties relating to the interpretation, breach or enforcement of any provisions of this Agreement.
Appears in 4 contracts
Samples: Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (FVA Ventures, Inc.), Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (FVA Ventures, Inc.), Membership Interest Purchase Agreement (FVA Ventures, Inc.)
Determination of EBITDA. (a) The 2009 EBITDAAs soon as reasonably practical after the Closing Date, Seller shall cause to be prepared and delivered to the Buyer, the 2010 EBITDASeptember 30 Financial Statements, and a proposed calculation of EBITDA for twelve month period ending September 30, 2007 (the 2011 “Initial EBITDA and, if applicable, the 2012 Calculation”). The Initial EBITDA Calculation shall be determined on accompanied by any supporting documentation or before other materials reasonably necessary to determine such calculation. The Buyer will then evaluate such materials, with input from its financial and accounting advisors. In the thirtieth (30th) day following event that the receipt by Buyer, of the final audited consolidated financial statements of the Company, for Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2010, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2012, as applicable, and Buyer does not object in any event no later than March 31 of 2010, 2011, 2012 or 2013, as applicable; provided that if the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA is disputed pursuant to this Section 2.5, such determination shall occur on such later date as the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable, shall have been finally determined hereunder (the date described in this sentence, the “Determination Date”).
(b) No later than ten (10) business days following issuance of the audited financial statements of the Company for Fiscal 2009, Fiscal 2010, Fiscal 2011 and Fiscal 2012, as applicable, the Company shall deliver a copy thereof writing to the Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative, together with a certificate of the Chief Financial Officer of the Company, which certificate shall set forth the Company’s calculation of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 Initial EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. Time is of the essence with respect to the delivery of such certificate.
(c) If the Buyer or the Sellers’ Representative shall disagree with such determination of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable, the disagreeing party shall notify the other party on or before the date which is thirty (30) days after the date on which the Company delivers to the Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative such statement of the Company’s 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative shall attempt in good faith to resolve any such disagreements. If Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative are unable to resolve all such disagreements on or before the date which is fifteen (15) days after notification by the disagreeing party of any such disagreements, the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer shall retain a nationally or regionally recognized independent public accounting firm not engaged by either the Company, Buyer or Parent at such time upon whom the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer shall mutually agree (such accounting firm being referred to as the “Final Accounting Firm”), to resolve all such disagreements. If Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative are unable to agree on the choice of an accounting firm, then Buyer and the Sellers’ Representative shall select a nationally or regionally recognized accounting firm by lot (after each submits a list of five names, excluding their respective regular outside accounting firms), which firm shall be the “Final Accounting Firm.” The Final Accounting Firm shall adjudicate only those items still in dispute with respect to the calculation of the 2009 EBITDA, 2010 EBITDA, 2011 EBITDA or 2012 EBITDA, as applicable. The determination by the Final Accounting Firm shall be binding and conclusive on both the Sellers and Buyer.
(d) The Final Accounting Firm shall offer the Sellers’ Representative and Buyer the opportunity to provide written submissions regarding their positions on the disputed matters, which written submissions shall be provided to the Final Accounting Firm, if at all, no later than ten (10) days after the date of referral of the disputed matters to the Final Accounting Firm. The Final Accounting Firm shall deliver a written report resolving only the disputed matters and setting forth the basis for such resolution Calculation within thirty (30) days after receipt of same, then the date of referral of Initial EBITDA Calculation shall be deemed to have been accepted by the disputed matters Buyer and shall become final and binding. In the event that the Buyer timely objects in writing to the Final Accounting FirmInitial EBITDA Calculation, then Seller and the Buyer shall use reasonable good faith efforts to resolve the dispute within thirty (30) days. The If Seller and the Buyer are unable to reach an agreement within such thirty (30)-day period, then within ten (10) days they shall submit the dispute to a nationally recognized accounting firm, mutually agreeable to Seller and the Buyer, whose determination of the Final Accounting Firm EBITDA shall be made in accordance with respect to the correctness of each matter in dispute this Section 2.2 and shall be final and binding (the “Valuation Arbitrator”). If Seller and the Buyer are unable to agree on a Valuation Arbitrator, each will select a nationally recognized accounting firm, who will then within ten (10) days select a third nationally recognized accounting firm to serve as “Valuation Arbitrator” hereunder. In submitting a dispute to the partiesValuation Arbitrator under this Section 2.2, each party shall prepare a detailed statement in support of their respective calculation of EBITDA. The feesValuation Arbitrator shall be required to accept any determinations for which there is agreement between Seller and the Buyer, costs and will only decide upon matters on which there is a substantive dispute. The party whose calculation is mathematically furthest from that of the Valuation Arbitrator shall pay the fees and expenses of the Final Accounting Firm Valuation Arbitrator. The amount established pursuant to this subparagraph shall be borne entirely by referred to as the Buyer, if all the disputed matters are resolved in favor of the Sellers and by the Sellers, if all the disputed matters are resolved in favor of the Buyer. Otherwise, the fees, costs and expenses of the “Final Accounting Firm shall be allocated between the Buyer, on the one hand, and the Sellers, on the other hand, based upon the percentage which the portion of the contested amount not awarded to each party bears to the amount actually contested by such party. For example, if the Sellers’ Representative claims that the 2010 EBITDA is $1,000 greater than the amount determined by the Company, and the Buyer contests only $500 of the amount claimed by the Sellers’ Representative, and if the Final Accounting Firm ultimately resolves the dispute by awarding the Sellers’ Representative $300 of the $500 contested amount, then the costs and expenses of the Final Accounting will be allocated 60% (i.e., 300 ÷ 500) to the Buyer and 40% (i.e., 200 ÷ 500) to the Sellers. The Final Accounting Firm shall conduct its determination activities in a manner wherein all materials submitted to it are held in confidence and shall not be disclosed to third parties. The parties hereto agree that judgment may be entered upon the determination of the Final Accounting Firm in any court having jurisdiction over the party against which such determination is to be enforcedEBITDA.
(e) The dispute resolution provisions of this Section 2.5 shall not apply to, and the scope of the Final Accounting Firm’s authority herein shall not extend to, any dispute of the Parties relating to the interpretation, breach or enforcement of any provisions of this Agreement.”
Appears in 1 contract
Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Omni Energy Services Corp)