Development Time Sample Clauses

Development Time. USSI will provide Customer with [*] StaffWeeks of CSM development (exclusive of travel, lodging, subsistence and communication expenses) for the charge of [*]. Travel, lodging, and subsistence expenses for USSI personnel performing any services away from USSI's ▇▇▇▇▇▇ Lake facility, as well as communication expenses (including but not limited to, telephone, telefax, courier, express mail and dial-up data transmissions), are additional and are the responsibility of Distributor. [*] Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the information contained within the "[*]" markings. Such marked portions have been omitted from this filing and have been filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Development Time. Appropriate soil survey work, subsurface analysis, traffic data and accident data must be collected. The preliminary surfacing recommendation using a minimum design life of 10 years will confirm the level of rehabilitation (minor or major). The data collection and engineering required to determine the level of rehabilitation should take six to nine months. Additional development time for a minor rehabilitation should be one and one half to two years, given the possible inclusion of other features. Install curb ramps wherever curb, gutter and sidewalk are adjacent to the project. Evaluate existing and potential pedestrian use to determine ramp locations, the need for sidewalk improvements, and the installation of additional sidewalk. Coordinate proposed improvements and any necessary exceptions with the ADA coordinator. STP (Primary) - If the existing width exceeds the width described in the “Design Guidelines” memo dated August 5, 2008 (note that these widths are different that the AASHTO roadway widths for collectors), reduce the top width to accommodate the overlay. If the resulting width will be less than the “Design Guidelines” width, steepen surfacing inslopes to no steeper than 4:1 before reducing the width. If the overlay cannot be accommodated by steepening the surfacing inslopes reduce the width to a minimum of 28 ft for ADT > 300, or a minimum of 24 ft. for ADT < 300. If the placement of the overlay will result in a top width less than 28 ft., employ the Roadway Width Decision Process to determine if a lesser width can be utilized. Widths less than 24 ft are not acceptable. Consider pavement management analysis when selecting minor rehabilitation projects. If the proposed rehabilitation strategy is the same, or one category above or below what is recommended by the Pavement Management System (PvMS) in their annual treatment and condition reports, no further review is needed. However, an in-depth review and justification is needed if the proposed project treatment moves the treatment from rehabilitation to preventative maintenance.

Development Time. ‌ An overview per year will be provided, showing: • Average development time for IEC standard • Average development time for EN IEC standard • Average development time for hEN IEC standard • Average development time for CENELEC homegrown EN • Average development time for CENELEC homegrown hEN • identification of number of late projects (CD - CDV - FDIS stages) 8 Annexes‌ Annex 1 Boomerang procedure‌ See attached document BT(SG)3996 of June 2000. REFINED APPROACH TO THE BOOMERANG PROCEDURE Follow up of D103/151 The comments and suggestions brought forward by CS on the practical implementation of the boomerang procedure (as defined in D102/159) had triggered the decision at 103 BT to reconvene the ad hoc WG for preparing a refined approach to the procedure based upon the comments received (ref. D103/151). The ad hoc WG “Boomerang” met on 5 June 2000 in Prague, under the convenorship of Dr R. Salffner (attendance list in Annex 1). As a first step the WG concentrated on the major proposed change, i.e. the simplification of the procedure by excluding all boomerang standards from parallel procedures. With this option there would be one and only one procedural way until IEC has finished its work and BT can make subsequently individual decisions on the implementation in Europe of boomerang IEC standards, on the basis of the advice from the relevant CLC/TC or SR. The WG agreed with this principle and resolved to recommend to BT the approval of the refined approach to the boomerang procedure as laid down in Annex 2. The discussion of the other comments and suggestions of CS led to the following guidelines in the context of the boomerang procedure : ∗ in case of coexistence of an EN 5XXXX and an identical (boomerang) EN 6XXXX, the latter should by preference be referenced. Emphasis should be put on this fact by stressing that this case merely reflects a renumbering action (see also Annex 3 and Annex 4); ∗ in this same case no dow shall be fixed for the adopted boomerang EN 6XXXX. It remains however the prerogative of BT to fix a dow where appropriate, on a case by case basis; ∗ once a boomerang standard has ended its journey, only that EN 6XXXX can be amended or revised.

Development Time. 115 STAFFWEEK(S) ----------------

Development Time. This is a research program and unexpected challenges can arise at any time. ISE will notify Encore of any such challenges and potential resultant delays as early as possible. ISE understands the time sensitivity of the program and will make all reasonable attempts to minimize the development time of each Milestone. It is estimated that Phase A will take 6-9 months and that Phase B ▇▇▇▇ ▇ake 9-12 months.

Development Time. The period beginning with the execution of this agreement and ending with the delivery for acceptance testing of the first filter prototype to OPLINK.