Common use of Discrepant Results Clause in Contracts

Discrepant Results. If the parties disagree as to whether Product is Defective Product and/or whether the cause of the nonconformity is Catalent Defective Processing, and this is not resolved within 30 days of the Exception Notice date, the parties shall cause a mutually acceptable independent third party to review records, test data and to perform comparative tests and/or analyses on samples of the alleged Defective Product and its components, including Client-supplied Materials. The independent party’s results as to whether or not Product is Defective Product and the cause of any nonconformity shall be final and binding. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing, the costs associated with such testing and review shall be borne by Catalent if Product is Defective Product attributable to Catalent Defective Processing, and by Client in all other circumstances. Client will be apprised in writing of all Defective Product investigations executed by Catalent on Client’s materials/products, including Product and Client-supplied Materials, as well as final investigation outcome and conclusion(s).

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Commercial Supply Agreement, Supply Agreement (TherapeuticsMD, Inc.), Commercial Supply Agreement (TherapeuticsMD, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Discrepant Results. If the parties disagree as to whether Product is Defective Product and/or whether the cause of the nonconformity is Catalent Defective Processing, and this is not resolved within 30 thirty (30) days of the Exception Notice date, the parties shall cause a mutually Certain identified information has been excluded from this exhibit because it both (i) is not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed. EXECUTION VERSION acceptable independent third party to review records, test data and to perform comparative tests and/or analyses on samples of the alleged Defective Product and its components, including Client-Client supplied Materials. The independent party’s 's results as to whether or not Product is Defective Product and the cause of any nonconformity shall be final and binding. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties in writing, the costs associated with such testing and review shall be borne by Catalent if Product is Defective Product attributable to Catalent Defective Processing, and by Client in all other circumstances. Client will be apprised in writing of all Defective Product investigations executed by Catalent on Client’s materials/products, including Product and Client-supplied Materials, as well as final investigation outcome and conclusion(s).

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Softgel Commercial Supply Agreement (Aurinia Pharmaceuticals Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.