Common use of Dispute Resolution for Claims Clause in Contracts

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiff). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.6.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i1) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii2) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses Out-of-Pocket Losses and/or Documented Time described in ¶ 2.12.3; and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data IncidentIncident(s). The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation information regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether , and claims previously made for identity theft and the claim is complete and plausibleresolution thereof. For any such claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimantclaimant’s claimSettlement Claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim Settlement Claim shall be referred for resolution to a claims referee for resolutionreferee, to be selected by the Parties if needed. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on Any costs associated with work performed by the claims referee should one shall be requiredpaid by Defendants.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer of Plaintiffs’ lawyers shall be designated to fill this role for PlaintiffPlaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with regarding the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.4.1 The Claims Administrator, in its his sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i1) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii2) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1{ 2.1 or { 2.2; and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation information regarding the claimed losses, available insurance and the status of any claims made for insurance benefits, and claims previously made for identity theft and the resolution thereof. The For any Claims for Extraordinary Expenses, the Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim Claim is complete and plausible. For any claims such Claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims Claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claimClaim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim Claim shall be referred to a claims referee the Claims Referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.4.1 The Claims Administrator, in its his sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i1) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii2) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.12.1 or ¶ 2.2; and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation information regarding the claimed losses, available insurance and the status of any claims made for insurance benefits, and claims previously made for identity theft and the resolution thereof. The For any Claims for Extraordinary Expenses, the Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim Claim is complete and plausible. For any claims such Claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims Claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claimClaim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim Claim shall be referred to a claims referee the Claims Referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.4.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for PlaintiffClass Counsel). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimantclaimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.4.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i1) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii2) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation information regarding the claimed losses, available insurance and the status of any claims made for insurance benefits, and claims previously made for identity theft and the resolution thereof. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s ’s’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for all Plaintiff). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a the claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the a claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., e.g. documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s 's initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs' lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s 's claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiff). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s of Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for PlaintiffPlaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 2.4.1 The Claims Administrator, in its his sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i1) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii2) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.12.1 or ¶ 2.2; and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation information regarding the claimed losses, available insurance and the status of any claims made for insurance benefits, and claims previously made for identity theft and the resolution thereof. The For any Claims for Extraordinary Expenses, the Claims Administrator’s 's initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim Claim is complete and plausible. For any claims such Claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims Claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs' lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claim's Claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim Claim shall be referred to a claims referee the Claims Referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiffall Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the claim shall be referred to a claims referee for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete assess whether the claimant has submitted a facially valid Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim Claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiff)through counsel. If the Settling Parties Parties, mutually, do not agree with the Claimant’s claim, after meeting and conferring, then the Claim shall be denied. If the Settling Parties disagree regarding the treatment of the Claim, the Claimant’s claim shall be resubmitted and referred to the Claims Administrator for a claims referee for final binding and independent resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on the claims referee should one be required.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 4 2.6.1 The Claims Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has and in good faith 6 provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be 7 necessary to reasonably support the out-of-pocket expenses and/or lost time described in ¶ 2.1¶¶ 2.1 and 2.2; 8 and (iii3) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has 9 suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Administrator may, at any time, 10 request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Administrator may 11 reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation 12 information regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination , available insurance and the status of whether any claims made for 13 insurance benefits, and claims previously made for identity theft and the claim is complete and plausibleresolution thereof. For any claims such 14 Claims that the Claims Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Administrator will 15 submit those claims Claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s Plaintiffs’ lawyer shall be designated to fill this role for Plaintiff16 all Plaintiffs). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the ClaimantSettlement Administrator’s claimdetermination, 17 after meeting and conferring, then the claim Claim shall be referred for resolution to a claims referee for resolutionthe claim referee, 18 to be selected by the Parties if needed. The Settling Parties will mutually agree on Any costs associated with work performed by the claims referee should one 19 shall be requiredpaid by NRS.

Dispute Resolution for Claims. 2.5.1 The Claims Settlement Administrator, in its sole discretion to be reasonably exercised, will determine whether: (i) the claimant is a Settlement Class Member; (ii) the claimant has provided all information needed to complete the Claim Form, including any documentation that may be necessary to reasonably support the expenses described in ¶ 2.1; and (iii) the information submitted could lead a reasonable person to conclude that more likely than not the claimant has suffered the claimed losses as a result of the Data Incident. The Claims Settlement Administrator may, at any time, request from the claimant, in writing, additional information as the Claims Settlement Administrator may reasonably require in order to evaluate the claim, e.g., documentation requested on the Claim Form, and required documentation regarding the claimed losses. The Claims Settlement Administrator’s initial review will be limited to a determination of whether the claim is complete and plausible. For any claims that the Claims Settlement Administrator determines to be implausible, the Claims Settlement Administrator will submit those claims to the Settling Parties (one Plaintiff’s lawyer Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx shall be designated to fill this role for all Plaintiff). If the Settling Parties do not agree with the Claimant’s claimIf, after upon meeting and conferring, the Settling Parties disagree as to the Claim validity, then the claim Claim shall be referred back to a claims referee the Settlement Administrator for resolution. The Settling Parties will mutually agree final determination on the claims referee should one be requiredClaim’s validity.