Common use of District Litigation Clause in Contracts

District Litigation. On December 1, 0000, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx No. 2 (“District No. 2”), whose boundaries encompass the Project, commenced a civil action in the District Court of Pitkin County, Colorado, No. 2017-CV-30137, which asserts claims against the previous master developer of Snowmass Base Village, The Related Companies, LP and various company affiliates (“Related”), together with named attorneys and consultants of District No. 2, previous lenders to District No. 2 and/or the former master developer of Snowmass Base Village and the former receiver for Snowmass Base Village, alleging certain unlawful and fraudulent activity by the defendants as related to the organization, financial structuring and administration of District No.

District Litigation. On December 1, 00002017, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Base Village Metropolitan District No. 2 (“District No. 2”), whose boundaries encompass the Project, commenced a civil action in the District Court of Pitkin County, Colorado, No. 2017-CV-30137, which asserts claims against the previous master developer of Snowmass Base Village, The Related Companies, LP and various company affiliates (“Related”), together with named attorneys and consultants of District No. 2, previous lenders to District No. 2 and/or the former master developer of Snowmass Base Village and the former receiver for Snowmass Base Village, alleging certain unlawful and fraudulent activity by the defendants as related to the organization, financial structuring and administration of District No.

District Litigation. On December 1, 0000, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx No. 2 (“District No. 2”), whose boundaries encompass the Project, commenced a civil action in the District Court of Pitkin County, Colorado, No. 2017-CV-30137CV-thirty137, which asserts claims against the previous master developer of Snowmass Base Village, The Related Companies, LP and various company affiliates (“Related”), together with named attorneys and consultants of District No. 2, previous lenders to District No. 2 and/or the former master developer of Snowmass Base Village and the former receiver for Snowmass Base Village, alleging certain unlawful and fraudulent activity by the defendants as related to the organization, financial structuring and administration of District No.

District Litigation. On December 1, 0000, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx No. 2 (“District No. 2”), whose boundaries encompass the Project, commenced a civil action in the District Court of Pitkin County, Colorado, No. 2017-CV-30137, which asserts claims against the previous master developer of Snowmass Base Village, The Related Companies, LP and various company affiliates (“Related”), together with named attorneys and consultants of District No. 2, previous lenders to District No. 2 and/or the former master developer of Snowmass Base Village and the former receiver for Snowmass Base Village, alleging certain unlawful and fraudulent activity by the defendants as related to the organization, financial structuring and administration of District No.Snowmass

District Litigation. On December 1, 00002017, Xxxx Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Base Village Metropolitan District No. 2 (“District No. 2”), whose boundaries encompass the Condominium Project, commenced a civil action in the District Court of Pitkin County, Colorado, No. 2017-CV-30137, which asserts claims against the previous master developer of Snowmass Base Village, The Related Companies, LP and various company affiliates (“Related”), together with named attorneys and consultants of District No. 2, previous lenders to District No. 2 and/or the former master developer of Snowmass Base Village and the former receiver for Snowmass Base Village, alleging certain unlawful and fraudulent activity by the defendants as related to the organization, financial structuring and administration of District No.