DISTRICT PROFICIENCY COMPARISON Sample Clauses

DISTRICT PROFICIENCY COMPARISON. Measure 2a Do math (or similar subject area) proficiency rates meet or exceed the district average? Result Points Possible Points Earned Math Proficiency Rate
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (32)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
DISTRICT PROFICIENCY COMPARISON. Measure 2a Do math (or similar subject area) proficiency rates meet or exceed the district average? Exceeds Standard: The school's proficiency rate in math either exceeds the district average by 16 percentage points or more, or is at least 80%. Meets Standard: The school's proficiency rate in math is equal to the district average, or exceeds it by 1 - 15 percentage points. Does Not Meet Standard: The school's proficiency rate in math is 1 - 15 percentage points lower than the district average. Falls Far Below Standard: The school's proficiency rate in math is 16 or more percentage points lower than the district average. The district average will be determined using the same grade set as is served by the public charter school. Bonneville Joint School District will be used for comparison purposes. Result Points Possible Points Earned Math Proficiency Rate Measure 2b Do ELA (or similar subject area) proficiency rates meet or exceed the district average? Result Points Possible Points Earned ELA Proficiency Rate Comparison to District Exceeds Standard: The school's proficiency rate in ELA either exceeds the district average by 16 percentage points or more, or is at least 80%. 50 0 Meets Standard: The school's proficiency rate in ELA is equal to the district average, or exceeds it by 1 - 15 percentage points. 30 - 45 0 Does Not Meet Standard: The school's proficiency rate in ELA is 1 - 15 percentage points lower than the district average. 15 - 29 0 Falls Far Below Standard: The school's proficiency rate in ELA is 16 or more percentage points lower than the district average. 0 - 14 0 Notes The district average will be determined using the same grade set as is served by the public charter school. Bonneville Joint School District will be used for comparison purposes. 0 ACADEMIC K-12 INDICATOR 3: CRITERION-REFERENCED STUDENT GROWTH (GRADES K-8) Measure 3a Are students making adequate academic growth to achieve math proficiency within 3 years or by 10th grade? Result Points Possible Points Earned Criterion-Referenced Growth Math Exceeds Standard: At least 85% of students are making adequate academic growth in math. 39-50 0 Meets Standard: Between 70% and 84% of students are making adequate academic growth in math. 26-38 0 Does Not Meet Standard: Between 50% and 69% of students are making adequate academic growth in math. 13-25 0 Falls Far Below Standard: Fewer than 50% of students are making adequate academic growth in math. 0-12 0 Notes 0 Measure 3b Are students mak...
Sample 1Sample 2

Related to DISTRICT PROFICIENCY COMPARISON

  • Statewide HUB Program Statewide Procurement Division Note: In order for State agencies and institutions of higher education (universities) to be credited for utilizing this business as a HUB, they must award payment under the Certificate/VID Number identified above. Agencies, universities and prime contractors are encouraged to verify the company’s HUB certification prior to issuing a notice of award by accessing the Internet (xxxxx://xxxxx.xxx.xxxxx.xx.xx/tpasscmblsearch/index.jsp) or by contacting the HUB Program at 000-000-0000 or toll-free in Texas at 0-000-000-0000.

  • District Responsibilities With respect to all sums deducted by the District pursuant to authorization of the employee, whether for membership dues or equivalent fees, the District agrees promptly to remit such monies to the Association together with an alphabetical list of unit members for who such deductions have been made, categorizing them as to membership or non-membership in the Association, and indicating any changes in personnel from the list previously furnished.

  • STATEWIDE ACHIEVEMENT TESTING When CONTRACTOR is an NPS, per implementation of Senate Bill 484, CONTRACTOR shall administer all Statewide assessments within the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (“CAASP”), Desired Results Developmental Profile (“DRDP”), California Alternative Assessment (“CAA”), achievement and abilities tests (using LEA-authorized assessment instruments), the Fitness Gram with the exception of the English Language Proficiency Assessments for California (“ELPAC”) to be completed by the LEA, and as appropriate to the student, and mandated by XXX xxxxxxxx to LEA and state and federal guidelines. CONTRACTOR is subject to the alternative accountability system developed pursuant to Education Code section 52052, in the same manner as public schools. Each LEA student placed with CONTRACTOR by the LEA shall be tested by qualified staff of CONTRACTOR in accordance with that accountability program. XXX shall provide test administration training to CONTRACTOR’S qualified staff. CONTRACTOR shall attend LEA test training and comply with completion of all coding requirements as required by XXX.

  • REGION The Contractor’s Region is as follows: Region 8.

  • Subprojects 1. The Borrower shall make Grants to Beneficiaries for Subprojects in accordance with eligibility criteria and procedures acceptable to the Bank as further detailed in the Project Operational Manual, including approval procedures to be followed by the Microcatchment Development Committee.

  • DIRECT PERSONNEL EXPENSE 4.1. Direct Personnel Expense of employees engaged on the Project by the ARCHITECT/ENGINEER includes ARCHITECT/ENGINEERS, other engineers, designers, job captains, draftsmen, specification writers and typists, in consultation, research and design in producing Drawings, Specifications and other documents pertaining to the Project, and in services during construction at the site.

  • Teams One team for the purposes of the Event shall consist of one Vehicle. Each Vehicle can contain a maximum of three Team Members, provided such Team Members have entered into a Team Entry Agreement with the Company or have otherwise agreed in writing to participate in the Event upon and subject to the Terms of Entry and the Event Rules. For the avoidance of doubt, it is the sole responsibility of each Team to inform themselves of the maximum numbers of persons legally permitted to travel in the Vehicle under Relevant Law. Vehicles: Rickshaws The Company shall provide each Team with the contact details of the Approved Hirer who will be able to provide each Team with a Vehicle for use in the Event, subject to the Team entering into an agreement (the “Borrowing Agreementâ€) with the Hirer outlining the terms of use of the Vehicle. Should the Vehicle not be delivered to the Designated Finish Point up to 3 days after the date of the official Finish Line Party, then the team will be liable for either the cost to retrieve the Vehicle and/or the "Hire Costs" beyond this date. Each Vehicle will be of a similar specification to that outlined in Schedule 4 to the Team Entry Agreement. For the avoidance of doubt, the Company shall make no representations or warranties as to the suitability of the Approved Hirer or of the Vehicle for participation in the Event and any rights or warranties which a Team may have or be granted in relation to the Vehicle shall be limited to those contained in the Rental Agreement or implied by any Relevant Law.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.