Electric Reliability Standards Sample Clauses

Electric Reliability Standards. A. General Provisions a) The standards are to be consistent with PUCT Substantive Rule §25.52—Reliability and Continuity of Service. b) Reporting periods are to be consistent with PUCT Substantive Rule §25.81—Service Quality Reports, and are to coincide with TNMP’s Electric System Service Quality Report to the PUCT. Annual evaluations will be for the 12-month period ending December 31 of each year. c) The initial evaluation will be for the reporting period ending December 31, 2001. d) Reliability indices are calculated for “forced interruptions” as defined by §25.52. e) The standards will be calculated and evaluated for the seven (7) Texas Business Units of TNMP individually. X. XXXXX and XXXXX Indices The following reliability standards for System Average Interruption Frequency Index (“XXXXX”) and System Average Interruption Duration Index (“SAIDI”) shall be calculated for each of the Texas Business Units. The distribution feeder standards shall be established for distribution feeders with 10 or more customers. a) No distribution feeder within a Business Unit shall sustain a “XXXXX” or “SAIDI” value for a reporting period that is among the highest (worst) 10% of the feeders within that same Business Unit for any two consecutive reporting periods. b) No distribution feeder within a Business Unit shall sustain a “XXXXX” or “SAIDI” value for a reporting year that is more than 300% greater than the system average of all feeders within that same Business Unit for any two consecutive reporting periods. c) No Texas Business Unit of TNMP shall exceed the system-wide XXXXX or XXXXX standard by more than 5.0% beginning in the 2001-reporting year. The system-wide standard is the average of the three reporting years 1998, 1999, and 2000. C. Guarantee to Meet Reliability Standards a) The annual service reliability guarantee for all of the Texas Business Units of TNMP combined will be a total not to exceed $500,000. The individual reliability guarantee for each Business Unit will be calculated based upon the percentage of total Texas customers that are served within each of the Business Units. b) The guarantee will be credited to customers based upon the following priorities: i) 10% Worst Distribution Feeder Performance ii) 300% Greater than System Average Distribution Feeder Performance iii) System Standards c) Terms of Guarantee i) 10% Worst Distribution Feeder Performance Standard (1) A service reliability credit of $20 shall be made to each customer on all feeders ...
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Electric Reliability Standards 
Sample 1

Related to Electric Reliability Standards

  • Quality Standards Each Party agrees that the nature and quality of its products and services supplied in connection with the other Party's Marks will conform to quality standards set by the other Party. Each Party agrees to supply the other Party, upon request, with a reasonable number of samples of any Materials publicly disseminated by such Party which utilize the other Party's Marks. Each Party will comply with all applicable laws, regulations, and customs and obtain any required government approvals pertaining to use of the other Party's marks.

  • Service Level Standards In addition to all other requirements in this Agreement, and in accordance with the Best Claims Practices & Estimating Guidelines, Vendor shall use reasonable and good faith efforts to meet the Service Level Standards set forth below.

  • Safety Standards Performance of the Contract for all commodities or contractual services must comply with requirements of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and other applicable State of Florida and federal requirements.

  • OMB Standards Unless specified otherwise within this agreement, the Subrecipient shall procure all materials, property, or services in accordance with the requirements of 24 CFR 84.40−48.

  • Quality Service Standards Price Services and the Fund may from time to time agree to certain quality service standards, as well as incentives and penalties with respect to Price Services’ Services hereunder.

  • Security Standards The Provider shall implement and maintain commercially reasonable security procedures and practices that otherwise meet or exceed industry standards designed to protect Student Data from unauthorized access, destruction, use, modification, or disclosure, including but not limited to the unauthorized acquisition of computerized data that compromises the security, confidentiality, or integrity of the Student Data (a "Security Breach"). For purposes of the DPA and this Exhibit G, "Security Breach" does not include the good faith acquisition of Student Data by an employee or agent of the Provider or LEA for a legitimate educational or administrative purpose of the Provider or LEA, so long as the Student Data is used solely for purposes permitted by SOPPA and other applicable law, and so long as the Student Data is restricted from further unauthorized disclosure.

  • Standards Compliance Registry Operator shall comply with relevant existing RFCs and those published in the future by the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), including all successor standards, modifications or additions thereto relating to the DNS and name server operations including without limitation RFCs 1034, 1035, 1123, 1982, 2181, 2182, 2671, 3226, 3596, 3597, 4343, and 5966. DNS labels may only include hyphens in the third and fourth position if they represent valid IDNs (as specified above) in their ASCII encoding (e.g., “xn--ndk061n”).

  • Reliability Reliability targets (Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF)) are defined in the technical specifications as set out in the Contract. Notwithstanding any possible application of penalties relating to reliability defined in the Contract, Goods shall remain covered by the warranty defined in this Article 16 as long as the reliability commitments have not been reached.

  • Compliance with Accessibility Standards All parties to this Agreement shall ensure that the plans for and the construction of all projects subject to this Agreement are in compliance with standards issued or approved by the Texas Department of Licensing and Regulation (TDLR) as meeting or consistent with minimum accessibility requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act (P.L. 101-336) (ADA).

  • Financial Viability and Regulatory Compliance 2.6.1 Contractor warrants and represents that its corporate entity is in good standing with all applicable federal, state, and local licensing authorities and that it possesses all requisite licenses to perform the services required by this contract. Contractor further warrants and represents that it owes no outstanding delinquent federal, state or local taxes or business assessments. 2.6.2 Contractor agrees to promptly disclose to the MPHA any IRS liens or licensure suspension or revocation that may adversely affect its capacity to perform the services outlined within this contract. The failure by Contractor to disclose such issue to the MPHA in writing within 5 days of such notification received will constitute a material breach of this contract. 2.6.3 Contractor further agrees to promptly disclose to the MPHA any change of more than 50% of its ownership and/or any declaration of bankruptcy that Contractor may undergo during the term(s) of this contract. The failure of Contractor to disclose any change of more than 50% of its ownership and/or its declaration of bankruptcy within 5 days of said actions shall constitute a material breach of this contract. 2.6.4 All disclosures made pursuant to this section of the contract shall be made in writing and submitted to MPHA within the time periods required herein.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!