Common use of Enforceability of Judgment Clause in Contracts

Enforceability of Judgment. The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in a New York Court against the Company based upon this Agreement under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands; (g) is not in respect of penalties, fines, taxes or similar fiscal or revenue obligations of the Company; and (h) is final and for a liquidated sum. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRC of such a New York Court judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRC.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (WORK Medical Technology Group LTD), Underwriting Agreement (WORK Medical Technology Group LTD)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Enforceability of Judgment. The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in a New York Court or a Florida court (pursuant to the terms of the Escrow Agreement) against the Company based upon this Agreement and the Escrow Agreement under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) or, in certain circumstances, an in personam judgment for non-monetary relief, and would give a judgment based thereon, provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; and (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands; (g) is not in respect of penalties, fines, taxes or similar fiscal or revenue obligations of the Company; and (h) is final and for a liquidated sum. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRC Singapore of such a New York Court judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRCSingapore.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Indemnification Escrow Agreement (Prime Skyline LTD), Underwriting Agreement (Prime Skyline LTD)

Enforceability of Judgment. The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in a New York Court against the Company based upon this Agreement under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands; (g) is not in respect of penalties, fines, taxes or similar fiscal or revenue obligations of the Company; and (h) is final and for a liquidated sum. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRC of such a New York Court judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Hong Kong or PRC.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (STAK Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Enforceability of Judgment. The courts of the Cayman Islands would recognize as a valid judgment, a final and conclusive judgment in personam obtained in a New York Court against the Company based upon this Agreement under which a sum of money is payable (other than a sum of money payable in respect of multiple damages, taxes or other charges of a like nature or in respect of a fine or other penalty) provided that (a) such courts had proper jurisdiction over the parties subject to such judgment; (b) such courts did not contravene the rules of natural justice of the Cayman Islands; (c) such judgment was not obtained by fraud; (d) the enforcement of the judgment would not be contrary to the public policy of the Cayman Islands; (e) no new admissible evidence relevant to the action is submitted prior to the rendering of the judgment by the courts of the Cayman Islands; (f) there is due compliance with the correct procedures under the laws of the Cayman Islands; (g) is not in respect of penalties, fines, taxes or similar fiscal or revenue obligations of the Company; and (h) is final and for a liquidated sum. The Company is not aware of any reason why the enforcement in the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Singapore, Hong Kong or PRC of such a New York Court judgment would be, as of the date hereof, contrary to public policy of the Cayman Islands, British Virgin Islands, Singapore, Hong Kong or PRC.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Underwriting Agreement (Intercont (Cayman) LTD)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!