Environmental Document. The CONSULTANT will assist the DEPARTMENT in completing the federal environmental document and all required attachments that may include the following: Type 1 Categorical Exclusion, Type 2 Categorical Exclusion, Environmental Assessment, Finding of No Significant Impact, Draft Environmental Impact Statement, and Final Environmental Impact Statement in accordance with Part 1, Chapters 2, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of the PD&E Manual.
Environmental Document. The Epick Three project was analyzed for development within the Village 1 Specific Plan Project EIR; State Clearinghouse #2010102018. Pursuant to the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act and the Environmental Guidelines of the City of Lincoln, the City has determined that the project is consistent with the Village 1 Specific Plan and will not result in any new significant environmental effects or substantial increases in the severity of significant effects previously identified in the EIR. Further, no new information has identified additional feasible mitigation measures. Therefore, no further analysis is required under CEQA. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15182, a public agency need not prepare an EIR or negative declaration for a residential project that conforms to a specific plan for which an environmental document has been prepared provided none of the circumstances in CEQA Guidelines section 15162 occur. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, a subsequent environmental document is required when a project would result in new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of significant effects identified in the original EIR or when substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken. The Epick Three Development Agreement is prepared as an accompanying document (by requirement) for the Epick Three development project, which has already been analyzed for conformance with the Village 1 EIR. Based on this previous analysis, the project will not result in any new significant impacts or increase the severity of any significant impacts identified in the Village 1 EIR. For these reasons, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Sections 15182 and 15162, no further environmental analysis is required.
Environmental Document a. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 and the County of Orange Local CEQA Procedures Manual, the A-E shall perform any required additional environmental reviews and documentation for the Project which was identified in the PA&ED phase, including any special environmental studies including but not limited to, air quality and cultural assessments etc. Environmental Studies (if needed) Amendment to the EIR (if needed) Environmental Document Anticipated Deliverables
Environmental Document. NEPA (National Environmental Policy Act): (Describe the document prepared)
Environmental Document. The proposed Scope of Work is to prepare the necessary Categorical Exclusion (CE) environmental documentation, Section 106 services, waters of the US determination and delineation, and waterway permits required under the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and associated Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) and Indiana Department of Transportation (INDOT) requirements, and other state and federal regulations. A summary of the Scope of Work is provided below: A Red Flag Investigation (RFI) will be conducted within 0.5-mile of the project area to determine if there are potential areas of concern. The RFI includes a review of appropriate layers within the State of Indiana Geographical Information Office (GIO) Library. The RFI will be submitted to the INDOT Site Assessment & Management (XXX) for their review of applicability and will be attached to the CE environmental document. A preliminary review of the IndianaMap for hazardous materials there are no hazardous material concerns in the project vicinity. The team will conduct site visits to visually inspect the project area, take photographs, and conduct other various environmental studies, including a bat habitat assessment. One preliminary field check meeting is also included. Initial project information will be gathered and summarized in an Early Coordination packet that will be distributed to the appropriate agencies as required by NEPA and the current INDOT Categorical Exclusion Preparation Manual. The packet will include project details and exhibits. A CONSULTANT staff member who has completed INDOT Bat Investigations for Field Personnel training will investigate any existing structures for the presence of bats. CONSULTANT will request INDOT Crawfordsville District review of the USFWS database for Indiana bat and Northern long-eared bat roosting, hibernacula, and capture sites to determine if there are documented sites within 0.5-mile of the project area. CONSULTANT will complete Range-Wide Programmatic Informal Consultation for Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat according to the User’s Guide for Range-Wide Programmatic Consultation for Indiana Bat and Northern Long-eared Bat and Using the USFWS’s Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) System for Listed Bat Consultation for INDOT Projects. CONSULTANT will use the IPaC website to generate an official species list and will again utilize the IPaC website and coordinate with INDOT Crawfordsville District to obtain a consistency letter a...
Environmental Document. 1. The City of San Diego has prepared a Notice of Exemption for Aldine Drive Storm Drain Emergency Repair (“ALDINE DR STORM DRAIN EMERGENCY”), Project No. B-23134.02.06, as referenced in the Contract Exhibit. You shall comply with all requirements of the Notice of Exemption as set forth in Exhibit L.
2. Compliance with the City’s environmental document shall be included in the Contract Price, unless separate bid items have been provided.
Environmental Document. The project is anticipated to require a Level 4 Categorical Exclusion (CE) due to the possibility of a Section 4(f) de minimis impact to recreation trails. The scope of work for completing the CE Document shall include the following:
1.1 Project Management/Coordination – Perform monthly project updates and general project management activities for preparation of the CE.
1.2 INDOT/FHWA Kickoff Meeting – Attend one (1) project kick off meeting with the INDOT District, INDOT central office and FHWA environmental reviewers to develop an understanding of their expectations and answer questions prior to starting the document.
1.3 Purpose & Need Development - Determine measures of transportation and economic performance based upon a high-level needs analysis in the project area. The need analysis shall use existing published data for the project area (such as traffic data from the SR 37 Mobility Survey) as well as congestion from traffic assignments (as provided by the traffic consultant).
1.4 Identify Property Owners and Mail Notice of Entry for Survey or Investigation Letters – Identify existing nearby property owners and mail them letters prior to any field work. Property owner information shall be identified using an online county GIS website.
Environmental Document. (Deliverable No.2):
a. Screencheck addendum document including text, tables, diagrams, and appendices.
b. Second Screencheck
c. Final addendum including text, tables, diagrams, and appendices.
Environmental Document a. See attached scope from S&ME for specific environmental work based on ODOT’s LPA form.
Environmental Document. The EIS must comply with all provisions of NEPA and its implementing regulations. The EIS is intended to fulfill NEPA requirements, and those of other Federal laws and regulations which may require the preparation of an EIS. The Service has chosen AMEC, in accordance with the provisions of 40 C.F.R. § 1506.5, to prepare the EIS. AMEC has no conflict of interest prohibited by regulations of CEQ, the Service, or any cooperating agency with NEPA responsibilities, as indicated by the Disclosure Statement required by 40 C.F.R. § 1506.5. NiSource has entered into a contract with AMEC consistent with the terms of this MOU. The Service shall assume complete final control over the scope, content, and the determination of adequacy of the EIS.
