We use cookies on our site to analyze traffic, enhance your experience, and provide you with tailored content.

For more information visit our privacy policy.

Air Quality Study Sample Clauses

Air Quality Study. We will prepare an air quality assessment for the project. Conformity with the Clean Air Act for regional operational emissions will be demonstrated by documenting that the project is consistent with the air quality analysis of the SANDAG Regional Transportation Improvement Program and Regional Transportation Plan. Local emissions will be addressed in accordance with Caltrans Transportation Project Level Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Air Quality Study. LAWA shall fund a study by an Independent Expert of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutant emissions from jet engine exhaust and other emission sources (“Air Quality Study”). In addition to other contaminant and pollutant emissions, the Air Quality Study shall measure jet engine exhaust emissions and provide chemical composition data from a representative sample of engine types and ages under a variety of conditions that reflect actual operations, and shall include this data and all other relevant study results as part of the final study provided to LAWA.
Air Quality StudyCONSULTANT shall prepare an air quality study. Assuming the CITY is the CEQA Lead Agency, an Air Quality Technical Report that meets Federal Highway Administration and Caltrans requirements for SIP conformity are not necessary. This study will then follow methods recommended in the Bay Area Air Quality Management District’s (BAAQMD) CEQA Air Quality Guidelines. The study will include the following: • Setting. Briefly describe setting conditions. Develop baseline conditions that describe meteorology/climate of the project area, existing air quality conditions, federal, state and local air quality rules and regulations, and approved air quality plans. Air pollutants and their impact on human health will also be described. • Regional Air Quality Impacts. Identify any applicable SIP conformity requirements for the project that pertain to air quality. Model changes in emissions associated with construction and operation using the appropriate versions of the CalEEMod and EMFAC models. The operational analysis will be based on the availability of traffic data. Compare emissions to significance thresholds. If project is included in the TIP, then operational emissions will only be provided for information purposes only. Transportation projects included in a TIP found to conform to the region’s air quality planning assumptions are assumed to have less-than-significant regional air quality impacts. • CO Hot Spot Analysis. Conduct a qualitative Hot Spot CO analysis based on the screening guidance provided by BAAQMD that is based on traffic volume. • Community Risk Impacts. Both construction and operation of the project will be evaluated for impacts associated with toxic air contaminants (TACs) that could be emitted during construction and operation of the project. Since residences are near the project, a health risk assessment is proposed that will include emissions modeling based on CalEEMod and dispersion modeling using AERMOD and meteorological data for San Xxxx. Operational impacts associated with traffic using the new roadway will be based on BAAQMD local roadway screening tables. This analysis will provide predicted levels of increased cancer risk, annual PM2.5 concentrations and non-cancer hazards. • Assess Project GHG Emissions. Changes to greenhouse gas emissions will be based on the CalEEMod and EMFAC modeling described above. These emissions will be evaluated against BAAQMD thresholds and City policies (i.e., GHG Reduction Strategy).
Air Quality Study. PA shall fund a study by an Independent Expert of toxic air contaminants and criteria air pollutant emissions from jet engine exhaust and other emission sources (“Air Quality Study”).
Air Quality StudyThe CONSULTANT will prepare an Air Quality Analysis to address local and regional impacts on sensitive land uses. The analysis will be prepared in accordance with the Caltrans Standard Environmental Reference. Baseline and project setting meteorological and air quality data developed through the California Air Resources Board (ARB) and climatological and air quality profile data gathered by the Placer County Air Pollution Control District will be utilized for the description of existing ambient air quality. Most recent published air quality data from the air quality monitoring stations nearest to the project site for the past three years will be included to help highlight existing air quality in the vicinity of the project site. Other sources such as regulatory documents, professional publications, and past experience in the project area will supplement background information. The CONSULTANT will estimate construction emissions based on construction information available and provided. In addition, standard dust suppression measures identified by COUNTY guidelines will be identified to minimize construction impacts. The Air Quality Analysis will document whether the proposed project is included in the latest Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), Federal Transportation Improvement Program (FTIP), and Federal Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP) for preliminary engineering/environmental documentation. The air quality analysis will make a final determination whether the build alternatives will conform to applicable state and federal air quality plans. The proposed project’s short-term construction and long-term operational impact on global warming and climate change will be discussed. • Draft/Final Air Quality Conformity Analysis Report • Draft/Final Air Quality Study
Air Quality Study. This study was designed to better understand the causes of increasing episodes of unhealthy levels of ozone in CAVE.
Air Quality StudyXxxxx Xxxxxx will prepare an air quality report evaluating the air impacts potential air mitigation measures for the proposed project As part of the analysis, we will collect air quality setting information and quantify construction emissions as required by the Monterey Bay Unified Air Pollution Control District Construction emission estimates will be based on project-specific on the CEQA Air Quality Guidelines, and on state and federal heavy duty construction equipment emission factors. We will use the significance thresholds to determine the project would result in significant air impacts. Where feasible, mitigation measures be identified for any significantair impacts. Since the project is a federally road project, we will evaluate whether the project meets transportation requirements. As the project does not involve increasing capacity on the roadway, the completed project is not expected to have an impact on microscale air concentrations in the project area. However, we will use the guidelines stated in the Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol to evaluate the impact of carbon monoxide concentrations at sensitive receptors near the project. We assume that aerial photographs of the project site (at a scale of 1 inch equals feet or less) showing air sensitive uses residences, schools) within 1,000 feet of the roadway will be provided to Xxxxx Xxxxxx before the analysis begins.

Related to Air Quality Study

  • Air Quality To the extent applicable, Consultant must fully comply with all applicable laws, rules and regulations in furnishing or using equipment and/or providing services, including, but not limited to, emissions limits and permitting requirements imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and/or California Air Resources Board (CARB). Although the SCAQMD and CARB limits and requirements are more broad, Consultant shall specifically be aware of their application to "portable equipment", which definition is considered by SCAQMD and CARB to include any item of equipment with a fuel-powered engine. Consultant shall indemnify City against any fines or penalties imposed by SCAQMD, CARB, or any other governmental or regulatory agency for violations of applicable laws, rules and/or regulations by Consultant, its subconsultants, or others for whom Consultant is responsible under its indemnity obligations provided for in this Agreement.

  • COUNTY’S QUALITY ASSURANCE PLAN The County or its agent will evaluate the Contractor’s performance under this Contract on not less than an annual basis. Such evaluation will include assessing the Contractor’s compliance with all Contract terms and conditions and performance standards. Contractor deficiencies which the County determines are severe or continuing and that may place performance of the Contract in jeopardy if not corrected will be reported to the Board of Supervisors. The report will include improvement/corrective action measures taken by the County and the Contractor. If improvement does not occur consistent with the corrective action measures, the County may terminate this Contract or impose other penalties as specified in this Contract.

  • CEQA Activities funded under this Grant Agreement, regardless of funding source, must be in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). (Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.) Any work that is subject to CEQA and funded under this Agreement shall not proceed until documents that satisfy the CEQA process are received by the DWR Grant Manager and the State has completed its CEQA compliance. Work funded under this Agreement that is subject to a CEQA document shall not proceed until and unless approved by the Department of Water Resources. Such approval is fully discretionary and shall constitute a condition precedent to any work for which it is required. If CEQA compliance by the Grantee is not complete at the time the State signs this Agreement, once the State has considered the environmental documents, it may decide to require changes, alterations, or other mitigation to the Project; or to not fund the Project. Should the State decide to not fund the Project, this Agreement shall be terminated in accordance with Paragraph 10, “Default Provisions.”

  • Musculoskeletal Injury Prevention and Control The hospital in consultation with the Joint Health and Safety Committee (JHSC) shall develop, establish and put into effect, musculoskeletal prevention and control measures, procedures, practices and training for the health and safety of employees.

  • Feasibility Study A feasibility study will identify the potential costs, service quality and other benefits which would result from contracting out the work in question. The cost analysis for the feasibility study shall not include the Employer’s indirect overhead costs for existing salaries or wages and benefits for administrative staff or for rent, equipment, utilities, and materials, except to the extent that such costs are attributable solely to performing the services to be contracted out. Upon completion of the feasibility study, the Employer agrees to furnish the Union with a copy if the feasibility study, the bid from the Apparent Successful Bidder and all pertinent information upon which the Employer based its decision to contract out the work including, but not limited to, the total cost savings the Employer anticipates. The Employer shall not go forward with contracting out the work in question if more than sixty percent (60%) of any projected savings resulting from the contracting out are attributable to lower employee wage and benefit costs.

  • Quality Assurance/Quality Control Contractor shall establish and maintain a quality assurance/quality control program which shall include procedures for continuous control of all construction and comprehensive inspection and testing of all items of Work, including any Work performed by Subcontractors, so as to ensure complete conformance to the Contract with respect to materials, workmanship, construction, finish, functional performance, and identification. The program established by Contractor shall comply with any quality assurance/quality control requirements incorporated in the Contract.

  • Erosion Prevention and Control Purchaser’s Operations shall be conducted reasonably to minimize soil erosion. Equipment shall not be operated when ground conditions are such that excessive damage will result. Purchaser shall adjust the kinds and intensity of erosion control work done to ground and weather condi- tions and the need for controlling runoff. Erosion control work shall be kept current immediately preceding ex- pected seasonal periods of precipitation or runoff.

  • Synchronization, Commissioning and Commercial Operation 4.1.1 The Power Producer shall give at least fifteen (15) days written notice to the SLDC / ALDC / DISCOM as the case may be, of the date on which it intends to synchronize the Power Project to the Grid System. 4.1.2 Subject to Article 4.1.1, the Power Project may be synchronized by the Power Producer to the Grid System when it meets all the connection conditions prescribed in the Grid Code and otherwise meets all other Indian legal requirements for synchronization to the Grid System. 4.1.3 The synchronization equipment and all necessary arrangements / equipment including Remote Terminal Unit (RTU) for scheduling of power generated from the Project and transmission of data to the concerned authority as per applicable regulation shall be installed by the Power Producer at its generation facility of the Power Project at its own cost. The Power Producer shall synchronize its system with the Grid System only after the approval of GETCO / SLDC / ALDC and GEDA. 4.1.4 The Power Producer shall immediately after each synchronization / tripping of generator, inform the sub-station of the Grid System to which the Power Project is electrically connected in accordance with applicable Grid Code. 4.1.5 The Power Producer shall commission the Project within SCOD. 4.1.6 The Power Producer shall be required to obtain Developer and/ or Transfer Permission, Key Plan drawing etc, if required, from GEDA. In cases of conversion of land from Agricultural to Non-Agriculture, the commissioning shall be taken up by GEDA only upon submission of N.A. permission by the Power Producer. 4.1.7 The Power Producer shall be required to follow the Forecasting and Scheduling procedures as per the Regulations issued by Hon’ble GERC from time to time. It is to clarify that in terms of GERC (Forecasting, Scheduling, Deviation Settlement and Related Matters of Solar and Wind Generation Sources) Regulations, 2019 the procedures for Forecasting, Scheduling & Deviation Settlment are applicable to all solar generators having combined installed capacity above 1 MW connected to the State Grid / Substation including those connected via pooling stations.

  • Development Reports Beginning six months after Effective Date and ending on the date of first commercial sale of a Licensed Product in the United States, LICENSEE shall report to Cornell progress covering LICENSEE's (and Affiliate's and Sublicensee's) activities and efforts in the development of rights granted to LICENSEE under this Agreement for the preceding six months. The report shall include, but not be limited to, activities and efforts to develop and test all Licensed Products and obtain governmental approvals necessary for marketing the same. Such semi-annual reports shall be due within sixty days (60) of the reporting period and shall use the form as provided herein as Appendix C.

  • Development Phase contractual phase initiated with the approval of ANP for the Development Plan and which is extended during the Production Phase while investments in xxxxx, equipment, and facilities for the Production of Oil and Gas according to the Best Practices of the Oil Industry are required.