Evaluation Assessment Sample Clauses

Evaluation Assessment. A Evaluation of the Candidate. Evaluation of the candidate should be based solely upon the procedures in this Agreement.
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District and Laney. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process. Other Terms: 1. Safety Services are not needed on fourteen (14) District holidays (as listed at the bottom of this exhibit), but should include services during the summer session; 2. Contractor shall provide equipment and all necessary labor during the time indicated; 3. District will provide an office for Contractor’s use, location to be determined by each college;
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District and the campuses. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process.
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ College and College of Alameda. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process. Other Terms: 1. Safety Services are not needed on fourteen (14) District holidays (as listed at the bottom of this exhibit), but should include services during the summer session; 2. Contractor shall provide equipment and all necessary labor during the time indicated; 3. District will provide an office for Contractor’s use, location to be determined by each college;
Evaluation Assessment. At each phase of the project, the EUDEM2 performance will be evaluated against the concept and technical specifications (see WP120 Evaluation & Assessment). This will be done in particular at regular intervals and/or for specific events, i.e. after each Milestone, EUDEM2 Workshop, during and after the half-year meetings with DG-INFSO and the regular meetings scheduled with the Advisory Panel. End-user (“customer”) feedback – for example during Interviews, Support Tasks activities (e.g. the Help Desk) and Workshops – will be an integral part of the evaluation process as well as DG-INFSO and Advisory Panel input (e.g. for the validation of deliverables). The output of this continuous evaluation will be fed back directly to the project management and corrective actions taken where necessary. We will monitor in particular all the defined measures of success (see Section Measurable ObjectivesMinimum Level of Success) as well as the risks mentioned under “Risk Analysis” (See Section Management).
Evaluation Assessment. The Committee will make recommendations to the Board with respect to the results of the Review (as defined below) as promptly as practicable following the completion of the Review. Following the Board’s review of the Committee’s determinations and recommendations and following the Board’s determinations, the Company shall promptly announce the Board’s determinations publicly.
Evaluation Assessment. “For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.” – ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ 29:11 Christian houses of worship are places that elicit intense emotional connection through experiencing the presence of God through worship and praise, as well as through communal support and fellowship with those sharing in that emotional experience. The results of the Nostalgia Inventory and Tenets of Christian Faith and Church Satisfaction Survey indicate both strong nostalgic longing for past experiences and committed devotion to a person’s personal religious faith. Additionally, respondents who are spiritual but not religiously affiliated shared in a heightened nostalgia level with those respondents from the two United Methodist churches who are actively participating in organized Christian ministry. There appears to be a share endorsement for participants who are longing for either past experiences they have experienced, or their perception of past generation’s experience. Across all groups and generations of participants who desire greater spiritual experiences, there was a heightened longing for “the way society was” with that item being rated on average at 8.3 out of 9 for the BUMC/MUMC group and 8.0 for the SBNR group. Additionally, there appears to be a heightened longing for “the way people were” item which averaged 7.7 for the BUMC/MUMC group and 7.0 for the SBNR group. These results indicate a shared longing for a time that was perceived to be better than the current social environment the participants experience currently. There appears to be a shared “seeking” experience between those who are participants in the Christian faith and those who are spiritual but not religious. This shared desire is open to the impact of nostalgic longing on the groups, yet also presents an opportunity for the destructive use of nostalgia that discourages connectiveness between the groups. Destructive Nostalgia ▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ observes that the "it was better in the good old days" phenomenon results from our memories being distorted and not faithful. 64 They are not accurate to what things really were like and are based on our impressions of what we believe experiences were like in the past. This is indicated with the results if the Inventory when compared to the Survey. The parishioners who scored the lowest in church satisfaction related to modern church practices were also the ones who scored the highest on the Nostalgia Inve...
Evaluation Assessment