Evaluation Assessment Sample Clauses

Evaluation Assessment. A Evaluation of the Candidate. Evaluation of the candidate should be based solely upon the procedures in this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District and the campuses. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process.
Sample 1
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District and other campuses. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process. Other Terms: 1. Safety Services are not needed on fourteen (14) District holidays (as listed at the bottom of this exhibit), but should include services during the summer session; 2. The Contractor shall provide equipment and all necessary labor during the time indicated; 3. District will provide a work space, to be determined by each college;
Sample 1
Evaluation Assessment a. As partners in a security and safety system that includes private security, community-based safety providers and student monitors, District and Contractor recognize that mutually beneficial feedback is useful for both parties. District shall meet with Contractor quarterly to review and evaluate services provided and will seek input from Contractor about the relationship between District and Contractor and safety conditions at the District, Xxxxxxx College and College of Alameda. b. District will be conducting a Districtwide needs assessment and survey about the quality and needs related to security and safety services throughout the District. Contractor will be invited to provide input in the needs assessment process. Other Terms: 1. Safety Services are not needed on fourteen (14) District holidays (as listed at the bottom of this exhibit), but should include services during the summer session; 2. Contractor shall provide equipment and all necessary labor during the time indicated; 3. District will provide an office for Contractor’s use, location to be determined by each college;
Sample 1
Evaluation Assessment. “For I know the plans I have for you, declares the Lord, plans for welfare and not for evil, to give you a future and a hope.” – Xxxxxxxx 29:11 Christian houses of worship are places that elicit intense emotional connection through experiencing the presence of God through worship and praise, as well as through communal support and fellowship with those sharing in that emotional experience. The results of the Nostalgia Inventory and Tenets of Christian Faith and Church Satisfaction Survey indicate both strong nostalgic longing for past experiences and committed devotion to a person’s personal religious faith. Additionally, respondents who are spiritual but not religiously affiliated shared in a heightened nostalgia level with those respondents from the two United Methodist churches who are actively participating in organized Christian ministry. There appears to be a share endorsement for participants who are longing for either past experiences they have experienced, or their perception of past generation’s experience. Across all groups and generations of participants who desire greater spiritual experiences, there was a heightened longing for “the way society was” with that item being rated on average at 8.3 out of 9 for the BUMC/MUMC group and 8.0 for the SBNR group. Additionally, there appears to be a heightened longing for “the way people were” item which averaged 7.7 for the BUMC/MUMC group and 7.0 for the SBNR group. These results indicate a shared longing for a time that was perceived to be better than the current social environment the participants experience currently. There appears to be a shared “seeking” experience between those who are participants in the Christian faith and those who are spiritual but not religious. This shared desire is open to the impact of nostalgic longing on the groups, yet also presents an opportunity for the destructive use of nostalgia that discourages connectiveness between the groups. Destructive Nostalgia Xx Xxxxxx observes that the "it was better in the good old days" phenomenon results from our memories being distorted and not faithful. 64 They are not accurate to what things really were like and are based on our impressions of what we believe experiences were like in the past. This is indicated with the results if the Inventory when compared to the Survey. The parishioners who scored the lowest in church satisfaction related to modern church practices were also the ones who scored the highest on the Nostalgia Inve...
Sample 1
Evaluation Assessment. At each phase of the project, the EUDEM2 performance will be evaluated against the concept and technical specifications (see WP120 Evaluation & Assessment). This will be done in particular at regular intervals and/or for specific events, i.e. after each Milestone, EUDEM2 Workshop, during and after the half-year meetings with DG-INFSO and the regular meetings scheduled with the Advisory Panel. End-user (“customer”) feedback – for example during Interviews, Support Tasks activities (e.g. the Help Desk) and Workshops – will be an integral part of the evaluation process as well as DG-INFSO and Advisory Panel input (e.g. for the validation of deliverables). The output of this continuous evaluation will be fed back directly to the project management and corrective actions taken where necessary. We will monitor in particular all the defined measures of success (see Section Measurable Objectives – Minimum Level of Success) as well as the risks mentioned under “Risk Analysis” (See Section Management).
Sample 1
Evaluation Assessment. The Committee will make recommendations to the Board with respect to the results of the Review (as defined below) as promptly as practicable following the completion of the Review. Following the Board’s review of the Committee’s determinations and recommendations and following the Board’s determinations, the Company shall promptly announce the Board’s determinations publicly.
Sample 1
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Evaluation Assessment 
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3See All (4)

Related to Evaluation Assessment

  • Performance Assessment 6.1 The Performance Plan (Annexure A) to this Agreement sets out key performance indicators and competencies that needs to be evaluated in terms of – 6.1.1 The standards and procedures for evaluating the Employee’s performance; and 6.1.2 During the intervals for the evaluation of the Employee’s performance. 6.2 Despite the establishment of agreed intervals for evaluation, the Employer may in addition review the Employee’s performance at any stage while the contract of employment remains in force; 6.3 Personal growth and development needs identified during any performance review discussion must be documented in a Personal Development Plan as well as the actions agreed to and implementation must take place within set time frames; 6.4 The Employee’s performance will also be measured in terms of contributions to the goals and strategies set out in the Employer’s Integrated Development Plan (IDP) as described in 6.6 – 6.13 below; 6.5 The Employee will submit quarterly performance reports (SDBIP) and a comprehensive annual performance report at least one week prior to the performance assessment meetings to the Evaluation Panel Chairperson for distribution to the panel members for preparation purposes; 6.6 Assessment of the achievement of results as outlined in the performance plan: 6.6.1 Each KPI or group of KPIs shall be assessed according to the extent to which the specified standards or performance targets have been met (qualitative and quantitative) and with due regard to ad-hoc tasks that had to be performed under the KPI; 6.6.2 A rating on the five-point scale described in 6.9 below shall be provided for each KPI or group of KPIs which will then be multiplied by the weighting to calculate the final score; 6.6.3 The Employee will submit his self-evaluation to the Employer prior to the formal assessment; 6.6.4 In the instance where the employee could not perform due to reasons outside the control of the employer and employee, the KPI will not be considered during the evaluation. The employee should provide sufficient evidence in such instances; and 6.6.5 An overall score will be calculated based on the total of the individual scores calculated above.

  • Joint Assessment If the Premises are not separately assessed, Lessee's liability shall be an equitable proportion of the Real Property Taxes for all of the land and improvements included within the tax parcel assessed, such proportion to be conclusively determined by Lessor from the respective valuations assigned in the assessor's work sheets or such other information as may be reasonably available.

  • Risk Assessment An assessment of any risks inherent in the work requirements and actions to mitigate these risks.

  • Conformity Assessment Procedures 1. Each Party shall give positive consideration to accepting the results of conformity assessment procedures of other Parties, even where those procedures differ from its own, provided it is satisfied that those procedures offer an assurance of conformity with applicable technical regulations or standards equivalent to its own procedures. 2. Each Party shall seek to enhance the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures conducted in the territories of other Parties with a view to increasing efficiency, avoiding duplication and ensuring cost effectiveness of the conformity assessments. In this regard, each Party may choose, depending on the situation of the Party and the specific sectors involved, a broad range of approaches. These may include but are not limited to: (a) recognition by a Party of the results of conformity assessments performed in the territory of another Party; (b) recognition of co-operative arrangements between accreditation bodies in the territories of the Parties; (c) mutual recognition of conformity assessment procedures conducted by bodies located in the territory of each Party; (d) accreditation of conformity assessment bodies in the territory of another Party; (e) use of existing regional and international multilateral recognition agreements and arrangements; (f) designating conformity assessment bodies located in the territory of another Party to perform conformity assessment; and (g) suppliers’ declaration of conformity. 3. Each Party shall exchange information with other Parties on its experience in the development and application of the approaches in Paragraph 2(a) to (g) and other appropriate approaches with a view to facilitating the acceptance of the results of conformity assessment procedures. 4. A Party shall, upon request of another Party, explain its reasons for not accepting the results of any conformity assessment procedure performed in the territory of that other Party.

  • Needs Assessment The determination of whether the Annual Income of a family or individual occupying or seeking to occupy a Qualifying Unit complies with the requirements for Extremely Low-Income Households or Low- to Moderate-Income Households shall be made by the applicable housing authority in the CDBG-DR Program area prior to admission of such family or individual to occupancy of a Qualifying Unit.

  • Report on Assessment of Compliance and Attestation (a) On or before March 1 of each calendar year, commencing in 2007, the Servicer shall: (i) deliver to the Owner and any Depositor a report (in form and substance reasonably satisfactory to the Owner and such Depositor) regarding the Servicer’s assessment of compliance with the Servicing Criteria during the immediately preceding calendar year, as required under Rules 13a-18 and 15d-18 of the Exchange Act and Item 1122 of Regulation AB. Such report shall be addressed to the Owner and such Depositor and signed by an authorized officer of the Servicer, and shall address each of the Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit 7 hereto delivered to the Owner concurrently with the execution of this Agreement; (ii) deliver to the Owner and any Depositor a report of a registered public accounting firm reasonably acceptable to the Owner and such Depositor that attests to, and reports on, the assessment of compliance made by the Servicer and delivered pursuant to the preceding paragraph. Such attestation shall be in accordance with Rules 1-02(a)(3) and 2-02(g) of Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act; (iii) cause each Subservicer, and each Subcontractor determined by the Company pursuant to Section 12.06(b) to be “participating in the servicing function” within the meaning of Item 1122 of Regulation AB, to deliver to the Owner and any Depositor an assessment of compliance and accountants’ attestation as and when provided in paragraphs (a) and (b) of this Section; and (iv) if requested by the Owner or any Depositor not later than February 1 of the calendar year in which such certification is to be delivered, deliver to the Owner, any Depositor and any other Person that will be responsible for signing the certification (a “Sarbanes Certification”) required by Rules 13a-14(d) and 15d-14(d) under the Exchange Act (pursuant to Section 302 of the Xxxxxxxx-Xxxxx Act of 2002) on behalf of an asset-backed issuer with respect to a Securitization Transaction a certification in the form attached hereto as Exhibit 6. The Servicer acknowledges that the parties identified in clause (a)(iv) above may rely on the certification provided by the Servicer pursuant to such clause in signing a Sarbanes Certification and filing such with the Commission. Neither the Owner nor any Depositor will request delivery of a certification under clause (a)(iv) above, unless a Depositor is required under the Exchange Act to file an annual report on Form 10-K with respect to an issuing entity whose asset pool includes Mortgage Loans. (b) Each assessment of compliance provided by a Subservicer pursuant to Section 12.05(a)(i) shall address each of the Servicing Criteria specified on a certification substantially in the form of Exhibit 7 hereto delivered to the Owner concurrently with the execution of this Agreement or, in the case of a Subservicer subsequently appointed as such, on or prior to the date of such appointment. An assessment of compliance provided by a Subcontractor pursuant to Section 12.05(a)(iii) need not address any elements of the Servicing Criteria other than those specified by the Servicer pursuant to Section 12.06.

  • No Joint Assessment Borrower shall not suffer, permit or initiate the joint assessment of the Property (a) with any other real property constituting a tax lot separate from the Property, and (b) which constitutes real property with any portion of the Property which may be deemed to constitute personal property, or any other procedure whereby the lien of any taxes which may be levied against such personal property shall be assessed or levied or charged to such real property portion of the Property.

  • Diagnostic Assessment 6.3.1 Boards shall provide a list of pre-approved assessment tools consistent with their Board improvement plan for student achievement and which is compliant with Ministry of Education PPM (PPM 155: Diagnostic Assessment in Support of Student Learning, date of issue January 7, 2013). 6.3.2 Teachers shall use their professional judgment to determine which assessment and/or evaluation tool(s) from the Board list of preapproved assessment tools is applicable, for which student(s), as well as the frequency and timing of the tool. In order to inform their instruction, teachers must utilize diagnostic assessment during the school year.

  • Periodic Risk Assessment Provider further acknowledges and agrees to conduct periodic risk assessments and remediate any identified security and privacy vulnerabilities in a timely manner.

  • Loss Assessment We will pay up to $1000 for your share of loss assessment charged during the policy period against you by a corporation or as- sociation of property owners, when the assess- ment is made as a result of:

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!