Evaluator Assessment Clause Samples
The Evaluator Assessment clause establishes the process by which an independent evaluator reviews and assesses certain aspects of a project, product, or service as specified in the agreement. Typically, this clause outlines the evaluator's qualifications, the scope of the assessment, and the criteria or standards to be applied. For example, it may require a third-party expert to verify compliance with technical specifications or performance benchmarks. The core function of this clause is to provide an objective, unbiased evaluation, thereby ensuring transparency and building trust between the parties regarding the quality or status of deliverables.
Evaluator Assessment. Evaluators should review the performance of teachers being evaluated throughout the year. This is not an end-of-the-year activity, but rather one that is conducted in a continuous manner. The evaluator should complete the rubric prior to the end-of-year review.
Evaluator Assessment. Evaluators should review the performance of SSP Employees being evaluated throughout the year. This is not an end-of-the-year activity, but rather one that is conducted in a continuous manner. The evaluator should complete the rubric prior to the end-of-year review.
Evaluator Assessment. Evaluators should review the performance of teachers throughout the year and record their ratings on the rubric as such information is collected. This is not an end of the year activity, but rather one that is conducted in a consistent and ongoing manner. The evaluator should complete the rubric prior to the end-of-year review. A teacher should know without question the likely rating they will be receiving End-of-Year Review The evaluator and teacher being evaluated discuss the teacher's performance ratings, self-assessment ratings, artifacts, and any evidence needed to support either the self-assessment or evaluator ratings. The evaluator assessment and effectiveness rating shall be available online to the teacher no less than two
Evaluator Assessment. Evaluators should review the performance of teachers throughout the year and record their ratings on the rubric as such information is collected. This is not an end of the year activity, but rather one that is conducted in a consistent and ongoing manner. The evaluator should complete the rubric prior to the end-of-year review. A teacher should know without question the likely rating they will be receiving End-of-Year Review The evaluator and teacher being evaluated discuss the teacher's performance ratings, self-assessment ratings, artifacts, and any evidence needed to support either the self-assessment or evaluator ratings. This step must be completed no later than the first Friday of May. Final Ratings Should the evaluator and the teacher being evaluated not agree on the final ratings during the end-of-year review, they should determine what additional evidence is needed in order to arrive at the final rating. The suggested two-week period provides adequate time to collect and summarize the evidence and have a discussion to determine final ratings. This step must be completed no later than the third Friday of May. The conclusions of the evaluator will not be subject to further review except as otherwise provided in these procedures. The teacher may appeal the application of the evaluation procedures by submitting a request for review to the supervisor of the evaluator to determine if the procedures were followed during the evaluation. Goal Setting and Performance Using the element and standard ratings, comments, and artifacts discussed during the end-of-year review and the establishment of final ratings, the teacher will develop a professional growth plan designed to address any areas in which growth and develop are needed, professional development or training required, and other resources needed to fully implement the professional growth plan.