Common use of Examination Arrangements Clause in Contracts

Examination Arrangements. 8.1. The language of the thesis and viva voce will be detailed in the individual Student Contract. The abstract must be prepared in both languages of the awarding institutions. Candidates should submit sufficient copies of a thesis for each of the examiners, and an additional copy for each institution. The thesis and the examination process should meet the criteria for the award of the relevant degree in the regulations of both institutions. Where the procedures of both institutions are substantially different, criteria must be drawn up which satisfy the minimum requirements of both institutions. Such criteria will be agreed in advance of any candidate being admitted by the Chair of the Graduate School Board (or her nominee) at Kent and XXXX at XXXX. 8.2. The examination board should comprise of a minimum of one examiner from Kent and one examiner from XXXX, and a minimum of one examiner external to both institutions. Additional examiners from either Party or external to both Parties may be appointed. There should be a minimum of 3 voting members on the panel and not more than 5. The co-supervisors may attend the viva voce. Supervisors should not have voting except where this has received prior agreement from both institutions and the supervisors do not have a share of the majority vote. 8.3. There should normally be one viva voce examination at which all the examiners are in attendance. The viva will take place at a mutually agreed location, specified in the Student Contract. All examiners are required to submit independent written reports of the thesis to each institution prior to the examination and within the time frame, as stipulated by the relevant regulations. After examining the thesis presented by the candidate and considering the results of any oral or written examination which they have conducted the examiners, at their discretion the examiner will recommend to the institution appropriate action.3 Examiners will be expected to submit a final joint report to each institution for approval.4 8.4. Video examination may be deemed useful when the examiners are from a number of different countries. 8.5. At the end of a successful examination the candidate will be awarded, in accordance with their respective regulations, the appropriate degree from both institutions. 3 xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx.xx/teaching/qa/regulations/research/regs_research.html#examination 4 Examiner’s report forms for inter-institutional research candidate can be downloaded 8.6. The degree certificate produced by each Party will include the name of the collaborative partner institution and the language(s) of assessment.

Examination Arrangements. 8.1. The language of the thesis and viva voce will be detailed in the individual Student Contract. The abstract must be prepared in both languages of the awarding institutions. Candidates should submit sufficient copies of a thesis for each of the examiners, and an additional copy for each institution. The thesis and the examination process should meet the criteria for the award of the relevant degree in the regulations of both institutions. Where the procedures of both institutions are substantially different, criteria must be drawn up which satisfy the minimum requirements of both institutions. Such criteria will be agreed in advance of any candidate being admitted by the Chair of the Graduate School Board (or her nominee) at Kent and XXXX at XXXX. 8.2. The examination board should comprise of a minimum of one examiner from Kent and one examiner from XXXX, and a minimum of one examiner external to both institutions. Additional examiners from either Party or external to both Parties may be appointed. There should be a minimum of 3 voting members on the panel and not more than 5. The co-supervisors may attend the viva voce. Supervisors should not have voting except where this has received prior agreement from both institutions and the supervisors do not have a share of the majority vote. 8.3. There should normally be one viva voce examination at which all the examiners are in attendance. The viva will take place at a mutually agreed location, specified in the Student Contract. All examiners are required to submit independent written reports of the thesis to each institution prior to the examination and within the time frame, as stipulated by the relevant regulations. After examining the thesis presented by the candidate and considering the results of any oral or written examination which they have conducted the examiners, at their discretion the examiner will recommend to the institution appropriate action.3 Examiners will be expected to submit a final joint report to each institution for approval.4 8.4. Video examination may be deemed useful when the examiners are from a number of different countries. 8.5. At the end of a successful examination the candidate will be awarded, in accordance with their respective regulations, the appropriate degree from both institutions. 3 xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx.xx/teaching/qa/regulations/research/regs_research.html#examination 4 Examiner’s report forms for inter-institutional research candidate can be downloaded. 8.6. The degree certificate produced by each Party will include the name of the collaborative partner institution and the language(s) of assessment.. 4 Examiner’s report forms for inter-institutional research candidate can be downloaded

Examination Arrangements. 8.1. The language of the thesis and viva voce will be detailed in the individual Student Contract. The abstract must be prepared in both languages of the awarding institutions. Candidates should submit sufficient copies of a thesis for each of the examiners, and an additional copy for each institution. The thesis and the examination process should meet the criteria for the award of the relevant degree in the regulations of both institutions. Where the procedures of both institutions are substantially different, criteria must be drawn up which satisfy the minimum requirements of both institutions. Such criteria will be agreed in advance of any candidate being admitted by the Chair of the Graduate School and Researcher College Board (or her nominee) at Kent and XXXX Equivalence and Thesis Defence Committee at XXXXthe School of Doctoral Studies at UAM. 8.2. The examination board should comprise of a minimum of one examiner from Kent and one examiner from XXXXUAM, and a minimum of one examiner external to both institutions. Additional examiners from either Party or external to both Parties may be appointed. There should be a minimum of 3 voting members on the panel and not more than 5. The co-supervisors may attend the viva voce. Supervisors should not have voting except where this has received prior agreement from both institutions and the supervisors do not have a share of the majority vote. 8.3. There should normally be one viva voce examination at which all the examiners are in attendance. The viva will take place at a mutually agreed location, specified in the Student Contract. All examiners are required to submit independent written reports of the thesis to each institution prior to the examination and within the time frame, as stipulated by the relevant regulations. After examining the thesis presented by the candidate and considering the results of any oral or written examination which they have conducted the examiners, at their discretion the examiner will recommend to the institution appropriate action.3 action.2 Examiners will be expected to submit a final joint report to each institution for approval.4approval.3 8.4. Video examination may be deemed useful when the examiners are from a number of different countries. 8.5. At the end of a successful examination the candidate will be awarded, in accordance with their respective regulations, the appropriate degree from both institutions. 3 xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx.xx/teaching/qa/regulations/research/regs_research.html#examination 4 Examiner’s report forms for inter-institutional research candidate can be downloadedbothinstitutions. 8.6. The degree certificate produced by each Party will include the name of the collaborative partner institution and the language(s) of assessment.

Examination Arrangements. 8.1. The language of the thesis thesis, summary and viva voce oral examination will be detailed in the individual Student ContractEnglish (unless where stated otherwise). The abstract must be prepared in both languages of the awarding institutions. Candidates Students should submit sufficient copies of a thesis for each of the examiners, and an additional copy for each institution. Additional copies of the thesis may also need to be submitted to meet the requirements of individual institutions. The thesis and the examination process should meet the criteria for the joint award of the relevant degree in the regulations of both institutions. Where the procedures of both institutions are substantially different, criteria an agreement must be drawn up which satisfy satisfies the minimum requirements of both institutions. Such criteria arrangements will be agreed in advance of any candidate students being admitted by the Chair of the Graduate School Board (or her nominee) at Kent two Parties and XXXX at XXXX. 8.2appended to this Agreement. The examination board should comprise of a minimum of one examiner from Kent and one examiner from XXXXeach of the institutions outlined in the student contracts, and a minimum of one examiner external to both institutions. Additional examiners from either Party institution of the two institutions, or external to both Parties may be appointed. There should be a minimum of 3 voting members on the panel and not more than 5. The co-joint supervisors may attend the viva voce. Supervisors should not have voting except where this has received prior agreement from both institutions and the supervisors do not have a share of the majority vote. 8.3voce as silent observers. There should normally be one viva voce formal oral examination at which all the examiners are in attendance. The viva oral examination will take place at a mutually agreed location, specified location as set out in the Student Contract. All examiners are required to submit independent written reports of the thesis to each institution prior to the examination and within the time frame, as stipulated by the relevant regulations. After examining the thesis presented by the candidate student and considering the results of any oral or written examination which they have conducted the examiners, at their discretion the examiner examiners will recommend to the institution institutions appropriate action.3 action. Examiners will be expected to submit a final joint report to each institution for approval.4 8.4approval. Video The institutional costs of the viva voce examination may will be deemed useful when paid jointly by the examiners two institutions unless alternative arrangements are from specified in the Student Contract. Should a number second examination be required the allocation of different countries. 8.5costs will be at the discretion of the two institutions concerned. At the end of a successful examination the candidate student will be awarded, in accordance with their the regulations of the respective regulationsParties, the appropriate degree from both institutions. 3 xxxx://xxx.xxxx.xx.xx/teaching/qa/regulations/research/regs_research.html#examination 4 Examiner’s report forms for inter-institutional research candidate can be downloaded 8.6a joint award. The Student Contract will set out which institution is responsible for graduation arrangements and for producing the degree certificate. Successful student will receive a single certificate. The certificate produced by each Party will include the name degree title, the names of the collaborative partner institution awarding institutions and bear the language(s) signatures of assessmentthe competent authorities in each institution.