File Format Standard Registry Operator (optionally through the CZDA Provider) will provide zone files using a subformat of the standard Master File format as originally defined in ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, Section 5, including all the records present in the actual zone used in the public DNS. Sub-format is as follows: Each record must include all fields in one line as: <domain-name> <TTL> <class> <type> <RDATA>. Class and Type must use the standard mnemonics and must be in lower case. TTL must be present as a decimal integer. Use of /X and /DDD inside domain names is allowed. All domain names must be in lower case. Must use exactly one tab as separator of fields inside a record. All domain names must be fully qualified. No $ORIGIN directives. No use of “@” to denote current origin. No use of “blank domain names” at the beginning of a record to continue the use of the domain name in the previous record. No $INCLUDE directives. No $TTL directives. No use of parentheses, e.g., to continue the list of fields in a record across a line boundary. No use of comments. No blank lines. The SOA record should be present at the top and (duplicated at) the end of the zone file. With the exception of the SOA record, all the records in a file must be in alphabetical order. One zone per file. If a TLD divides its DNS data into multiple zones, each goes into a separate file named as above, with all the files combined using tar into a file called <tld>.zone.tar.
Examples (A) The taxpayer has received a statutory notice of deficiency, under I.R.C. §6212, which entitles the taxpayer to seek Tax Court review of a proposed tax deficiency. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek Tax Court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights. (B) The IRS has filed a notice of Federal tax lien with respect to an assessed tax liability, and the taxpayer has been issued a notice under I.R.C. §6320 entitling the taxpayer to request a hearing with the IRS Office of Appeals contesting the lien filing, and to further appeal to the Tax Court if the IRS determines to sustain the lien filing. In the course of the hearing, the taxpayer is entitled to contest the underlying tax liability because the taxpayer has had no prior opportunity to contest the liability. This is not a delinquent tax because it is not a final tax liability. Should the taxpayer seek tax court review, this will not be a final tax liability until the taxpayer has exercised all judicial appeal rights. (C) The taxpayer has entered into an installment agreement pursuant to I.R.C. §6159. The taxpayer is making timely payments and is in full compliance with the agreement terms. The taxpayer is not delinquent because the taxpayer is not currently required to make full payment. (D) The taxpayer has filed for bankruptcy protection. The taxpayer is not delinquent because enforced collection action is stayed under 11 U.S.C. §362 (the Bankruptcy Code).
Contract Database Metadata Elements Title: Sayville Union Free School District and Sayville Union Free School Custodial and Maintenance Employees Unit, United Public Service Employees Union (UPSEU), Local 424 (2011) Employer Name: Sayville Union Free School District Union: Sayville Union Free School Custodial and Maintenance Employees Unit, United Public Service Employees Union (UPSEU) Local: 424 Effective Date: 07/01/2011 Expiration Date: 06/30/2015 PERB ID Number: 6131 Unit Size: 55 Number of Pages: 24 For additional research information and assistance, please visit the Research page of the Catherwood website - ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/library/research/ For additional information on the ILR School - ▇▇▇▇://▇▇▇.▇▇▇.▇▇▇▇▇▇▇.▇▇▇/ 55 People TABLE OF CONTENTS ARTICLE Page XXII ANNUAL LEAVE DAYS 14 XXV BREAKS 18 XXVI CIVIL SERVICE LAW ARTICLE SECTION 75 18 XXVIII DURATION 19 XIV EMERGENCY WORK 11 XXI FOUL WEATHER CLOTHING 14 XI GRIEVANCE PROCEDURE 9 XVI HIGHER JOB CLASSIFICATION 12 XVIII HOLIDAYS 13 XV HOLIDAY AND WEEKEND BUILDING CHECKS 12 V INSURANCE 4 X LAYOFF, DISPLACEMENT AND RECALL ORDER 8 VII MANAGEMENT RIGHTS 7 XXVII MISCELLANEOUS 19 XVII NOTICES OF PROMOTIONS 13 XIII OVERTIME 10 II PAYROLL DEDUCTIONS 1 III PERSONNEL FILES 2 XXIV PHYSICAL EXAMINATIONS 18 XXIII RETIREMENT 16 IX STRIKES AND LOCKOUTS 7 XIX VACATIONS 13 XX VISITATION 14 IV WAGES 3 VI WORKERS' COMPENSATION 6 XII WORKWEEK 10 VIII WRITTEN BOARD POLICY 8 APPENDIX A 20 4/20/2016 AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of November 2013 between the SAYVILLE UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT (hereinafter referred to as the “District”) and United Public Service Employees Union, ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, N.Y. 11779 (hereinafter referred to as the “Union”).
Signaling protocol 4.1.3.1 SS7 Signaling is AT&T-21STATE’s preferred method for signaling. Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to use their best efforts to convert to SS7. If SS7 services are provided by AT&T-21STATE, they will be provided in accordance with the provisions of the applicable access tariffs. 4.1.3.2 Where MF signaling is currently used, the Parties agree to interconnect their networks using MF or dual tone MF (DTMF) signaling, subject to availability at the End Office Switch or Tandem Switch at which Interconnection occurs. The Parties acknowledge that the use of MF signaling may not be optimal. AT&T-21STATE will not be responsible for correcting any undesirable characteristics, service problems or performance problems that are associated with MF/SS7 inter-working or the signaling protocol required for Interconnection with CLEC employing MF signaling.
Separation of Components The SOFTWARE PRODUCT is licensed as a single product. Its component parts may not be separated for use on more than one computer.