Failure to Dispute Sample Clauses

Failure to Dispute. If the Corporation does not dispute its liability with respect to any claim or demand as contemplated by paragraph (b) above, such claim or demand shall conclusively be deemed to be the responsibility of the Corporation hereunder.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Failure to Dispute. If the Seller does not deliver the Disputed Items Notice to the Purchaser within 30 days after the date of delivery of the Closing Cash Purchase Price Certificate, the calculation of the Closing Cash Purchase Price specified in the Closing Cash Purchase Price Certificate will be conclusively presumed to be true and correct in all respects and will be final and binding upon all interested parties.

Related to Failure to Dispute

  • Failure to Remedy If the Funder has provided the HSP with an opportunity to remedy the breach, and: the HSP does not remedy the breach within the time period specified in the Notice; it becomes apparent to the Funder that the HSP cannot completely remedy the breach within the time specified in the Notice or such further period of time as the Funder considers reasonable; or the HSP is not proceeding to remedy the breach in a way that is satisfactory to the Funder, then the Funder may immediately terminate this Agreement by giving Notice of termination to the HSP.

  • Failure to Defend If the Indemnifying Party, within a reasonable time after notice of any such Claim, fails to defend such Claim actively and in good faith, the Indemnified Party will (upon further notice) have the right to undertake the defense, compromise or settlement of such Claim or consent to the entry of a judgment with respect to such Claim, on behalf of and for the account and risk of the Indemnifying Party, and the Indemnifying Party shall thereafter have no right to challenge the Indemnified Party's defense, compromise, settlement or consent to judgment.

  • Failure to Cure If DSHS learns of a pattern or practice of the Business Associate that constitutes a violation of the Business Associate’s obligations under the terms of this Contract and reasonable steps by DSHS do not end the violation, DSHS shall terminate this Contract, if feasible. In addition, If Business Associate learns of a pattern or practice of its Subcontractors that constitutes a violation of the Business Associate’s obligations under the terms of their contract and reasonable steps by the Business Associate do not end the violation, Business Associate shall terminate the Subcontract, if feasible.

  • Failure to Determine Values If the Borrower shall fail to determine the value of any Portfolio Investment as at any date pursuant to the requirements of the foregoing sub-clauses (A), (B) or (C), then the “Value” of such Portfolio Investment as at such date shall be deemed to be zero.

  • Failure to Respond If you fail to respond by the date given above, your application will be refused under Section 3A(4)(a) of the Registered Designs Act 1949.

  • Failure to Meet Timelines Failure by the Union to comply with the timelines will result in the automatic withdrawal of the grievance. Failure by the Employer to comply with the timelines will entitle the Union to move the grievance to the next step of the procedure.

  • Failure to Reach Agreement If Company and Seller are unable to agree upon and execute a Performance Standards Revision Document within 180 Days of Company's written notice to Seller pursuant to Section 23.4 (Performance Standards Revision Document), Company shall have the option of declaring the failure to reach agreement on and execute such Performance Standards Revision Document to be a dispute and submit such dispute to an Independent Evaluator for the conduct of a determination pursuant to Section 23.10 (Dispute) of this Agreement. Any decision of the Independent Evaluator, rendered as a result of such dispute shall include a form of a Performance Standards Revision Document as described in Section 23.4 (Performance Standards Revision Document). PUC Performance Standards Revision Order. No Performance Standards Revision Document shall constitute an amendment to the Agreement unless and until a PUC Performance Standards Revision Order issued with respect to such Document has become non-appealable. Once the condition of the preceding sentence has been satisfied, such Performance Standards Revision Document shall constitute an amendment to this Agreement. To be "non-appealable" under this Section 23.6 (PUC Performance Standards Revision Order), such PUC Performance Standards Revision Order shall be either (i) not subject to appeal to any Circuit Court of the State of Hawai‘i or the Supreme Court of the State of Hawai‘i, because the thirty (30) Day period (accounting for weekends and holidays as appropriate) permitted for such an appeal has passed without the filing of notice of such an appeal, or (ii) affirmed on appeal to any Circuit Court of the State of Hawai‘i or the Supreme Court, or the Intermediate Appellate Court upon assignment by the Supreme Court, of the State of Hawai‘i, or affirmed upon further appeal or appellate process, and is not subject to further appeal, because the jurisdictional time permitted for such an appeal (and/or further appellate process such as a motion for reconsideration or an application for writ of certiorari) has passed without the filing of notice of such an appeal (or the filing for further appellate process).

  • Failure to Deliver Applicable

  • Failure to Return Failure of the employee to return pursuant to the date determined in this Section will constitute grounds for termination by the School District unless the School District and the employee mutually agree to an extension of the leave.

  • Failure to Notify If Contractor fails to specify in writing any problem or circumstance that materially affects the costs of its delivery of services or products, including a material breach by the Department, about which Contractor knew or reasonably should have known with respect to the period during the term covered by Contractor's status report, Contractor shall not be entitled to rely upon such problem or circumstance as a purported justification for an increase in the price for the agreed upon scope.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!