February 2007. The Company shall prepare the necessary calculations for review by the TWU no later than 1 month prior to the date that the adjustment is due.
February 2007. 79.74317181 August 2011....... 66.
February 2007. The parties shall conduct negotiations with bona fides with the aim of arriving at a detailed agreement on the basis of the principles specified in this Memorandum of Agreements by 15 March 2007. This Memorandum of Agreements shall be in effect: (1) as long as the percentage of ORL shares acquired by the parties exceeds 20% of ORL’s issued share capital, and the shareholding ratio of Scailex Group shall not drop below 8% of ORL’s share capital; or (2) 24 months have elapsed since the signing date of this Memorandum of Agreements – whichever of the two is later.
February 2007. 4.3 If the period referred to in clause 4.1 of this Attachment ends on 21 February 2007, then on and from 22 February 2007 the Employee’s employment will be at the highest classification and/or salary point that complies with this Agreement.
February 2007. If you are a full-time employee who is paid an hourly rate of pay you are required to record all overtime hours worked by you in an appropriate manner that has been approved by the Employer. If you are a part-time or casual employee you are to record all hours worked by you in an appropriate manner that has been approved by the Employer. The time records should clearly indicate the time you commenced and finished work and the time that you left for an unpaid break and when you returned from that break. The Employer will ensure that an effective method of recording such times is made available. If you are unable to record your time for any reason you must inform your supervisor immediately.
February 2007. Any document, policy or otherwise, which details a bonus or incentive program does not become a term of any contract between the Employer and employee and does not vest in an employee enforceable legal, equitable or statutory rights against the Employer or any of the Employers associated, or affiliated, companies.
February 2007. If no negative comments are received, it is intended that the President of the IHB and the Chairman of DGIWG will sign the CA at a convenient place and time. Annex A: Member States' comments on IHB CL 4/2006 dated 13 January 2006 Annex B: CA between IHO and DGIWG For the reasons indicated in the Draft Agreement, some convergences seem desirable in the end between the future series of S-100 standards and the DGIWG standards (DIGEST). Bearing in mind that the main raison d’être of the IHO remains safety of navigation, SHOM is nevertheless anxious not to excessively disperse the resources provided by the Member States within the Organization. Therefore, SHOM is not in favour of the creation of another joint working group, involving the IHO, with a mandate to draft a standard of interoperability between the existing ENC and DNC products (cf. CL4/2006, Xxxxx A, para. 4.a.), when the IHO as a whole still has difficulties in providing mariners with a worldwide coverage of official electronic charts (ENC). For SHOM, this is a question of principle. Furthermore, SHOM considers that it is not the IHO’s responsibility to define modes of harmonization of military products (not dedicated to safety of navigation) like the Additional Military Layer (AML), covered by the NATO Standardization Agreement 7170, and the TODs which, after all, do not correspond to any NATO or ISO standard. XXXX considers that it is up to the specific NATO WG, the Geospatial Maritime Working Group (GMWG), to decide on this need, and not the IHO. SHOM cannot therefore approve the draft Cooperation Agreement as it stands. A detailed analysis of the paragraphs of the draft agreement where SHOM objects or has comments is provided here below. XXXX is somewhat surprised by the procedure used for consulting the Member States and notes, in the first place, that the reference made to an endorsement obtained at the 17th meeting of the XXXXX Committee does not reflect what actually happened (cf. para. 12.2 of the final Minutes referred to in CL 16/2006): “Draft DGIWG-IHO CA not endorsed”), quite apart from the fact that consideration of this matter by the XXXXX Committee did not apparently go very smoothly. Consequently, XXXX considers that the procedure of “silence” adopted by the Directing Committee is not appropriate; it firmly invites the DC to reconsult the XXXXX Committee. This proposal is justified in view of the Committee’s rather ambiguous recommendation (CL 16/2006, Annex A, point 12.2: “IHB to c...
February 2007. The document stipulates that the favourable tariffs for employees and pensioners will be maintained as under the present conditions until the full opening of the market.
