Functional Suitability Sample Clauses

Functional Suitability. Degree to which a product or system provides functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified conditions. Measurement function: FS=( X+Y+Z) / 3( where X,Y,Z are the scores computed as in the following FS = Functional Suitability
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Functional Suitability. Degree to which a product or system provides functions that meet stated and implied needs when used under specified conditions 1. Measurement function: FS=( X+Y+Z) / 3( where X,Y,Z are the scores computed as in the following 2. Interpretation of test results: FS value closer to 1 is better degree to which the set of functions covers all the specified tasks and user objectives 1. Possible Measure: Functional implementation coverage 2. Description of the measure: How complete is the implementation according to requirement specifications? 3. Measurement function: X=(X1+X2*0.5+X3*0.25)/1.75 with X1=1-(A/B) where A= Number of missing or unsatisfying mandatory functions B= Number of mandatory functions assessed in the evaluation X2= 1-C/D C= Number of missing or unsatisfying desirable functions assessed in the evaluation D= Number of recommended functions X3= 1-E/F E= Number of missing or unsatisfying desirable functions assessed in the evaluation F= Number of desirable functions NOTE: that the evaluation will be calculated by presence/absence of the function in the RO. In particular 0 value is associated to the presence of the function and 1 to its the absence. 4. Interpretation of test results: X value closer to 1 is better Degree to which a product or system provides the correct results with the needed degree of precision. 1. Possible Measure: Correctness of data items 2. Description of the measure: How much the required specific accuracy of data items are complied with? 3. Measurement function: According to the list provided for the Functional Completeness, for each of the implemented functions in the RO, provide a score of correctness among (0, 0.5, 1) where 0= not correct; 0.5 = partially correct; 1= completely correct. Y= A/B where A= sum of the scores of the implemented functions; B= total amount of implemented functions 5. Interpretation of test results: Y value closer to 1 is better Degree to which the functions facilitate the accomplishment of specified tasks and objectives. 1. Possible Measure: functional appropriateness 2. Description of the measure: How many functions with no problem are implemented for the appropriate functions for pursuing a specific task.
Functional Suitability. In order to test the functional suitability of the implemented functionalities, the NOMAD platform has been used by developers and IT experts to identify the prototype behaviour with respect the planned one and to check whether the user requirements, as they are presented in the NOMAD Deliverable D2.2[2], and the functional requirements, as they are presented in the NOMAD Deliverable D6.1[1], have been addressed. The testing process follows a number of test use cases, which are iteratively repeated. These tests should be successfully accomplished from the NOMAD platform and in all iterations they should provide the same results. The test cases relate to the NOMAD requirements and for each of them the result of the testing process is reported. For all the test cases, the http client of the NOMAD platform prototype has been used as the method for observation testing, while direct access to the logs of the NOMAD Server ensure that the intended use of the functionalities is performed (with no programming level exceptions to be occurred).

Related to Functional Suitability

  • Suitability The Dealer Manager will offer Shares, and in its agreement with each Soliciting Dealer will require that the Soliciting Dealer offer Shares, only to Persons that it has reasonable grounds to believe meet the financial qualifications set forth in the Prospectus or in any suitability letter or memorandum sent to it by the Company and will only make offers to Persons in the states in which it is advised in writing by the Company that the Shares are qualified for sale or that such qualification is not required. In offering Shares, the Dealer Manager will comply, and in its agreements with the Soliciting Dealers, the Dealer Manager will require that the Soliciting Dealers comply, with the provisions of all applicable rules and regulations relating to suitability of investors, including without limitation the FINRA Conduct Rules and the provisions of Article III.C. of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts of the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (the “NASAA Guidelines”). The Dealer Manager agrees that in recommending the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering to an investor, the Dealer Manager and each Person associated with the Dealer Manager that make such recommendation shall have, and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree with respect to investors to which it makes a recommendation shall agree that it shall have, reasonable grounds to believe, on the basis of information obtained from the investor concerning the investor’s investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs, and any other information known by the Dealer Manager, the Person associated with the Dealer Manager or the Soliciting Dealer that: (i) the investor is or will be in a financial position appropriate to enable the investor to realize to a significant extent the benefits described in the Prospectus, including the tax benefits where they are a significant aspect of the Company; (ii) the investor has a fair market net worth sufficient to sustain the risks inherent in the program, including loss of investment and lack of liquidity; and (iii) an investment in the Shares offered in the Primary Offering is otherwise suitable for the investor. The Dealer Manager agrees as to investors to whom it makes a recommendation with respect to the purchase of the Shares in the Primary Offering (and each Soliciting Dealer in its Soliciting Dealer Agreement shall agree, with respect to investors to whom it makes such recommendations) to maintain in the files of the Dealer Manager (or the Soliciting Dealer, as applicable) documents disclosing the basis upon which the determination of suitability was reached as to each investor. In making the determinations as to financial qualifications and as to suitability required by the NASAA Guidelines, the Dealer Manager and Soliciting Dealers may rely on (A) representations from investment advisers who are not affiliated with a Soliciting Dealer, banks acting as trustees or fiduciaries, and (B) information it has obtained from a prospective investor, including such information as the investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs of the Person or any other information known by the Dealer Manager (or Soliciting Dealer, as applicable), after due inquiry. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Dealer Manager shall not, and each Soliciting Dealer shall agree not to, execute any transaction in the Company in a discretionary account without prior written approval of the transaction by the customer.

  • Limitation of Offer; Suitability (a) Participating Dealer will offer Primary Shares only to persons who meet the suitability standards set forth in the Prospectus and any suitability letter or memorandum sent to it by the Company or the Dealer Manager and will only make offers to persons in the jurisdictions in which it is advised in writing by the Company or the Dealer Manager that the Primary Shares are qualified for sale or that such qualification is not required (the “Qualified Jurisdictions”). Notwithstanding the qualification of the Primary Shares for sale in any respective jurisdiction (or the exemption therefrom), Participating Dealer represents, warrants and covenants that it will not offer Primary Shares and will not permit any of its registered representatives to offer Primary Shares in any jurisdiction unless both Participating Dealer and such registered representative are duly licensed to transact securities business in such jurisdiction. In offering Primary Shares, Participating Dealer will comply with the provisions of the Rules of Fair Practice set forth in the FINRA Manual, as well as all other applicable rules and regulations relating to suitability of investors, including without limitation, the provisions of Section III.C. of the Statement of Policy Regarding Real Estate Investment Trusts of the North American Securities Administrators Association, Inc. (the “NASAA REIT Guidelines”). (b) Participating Dealer further represents, warrants and covenants that neither Participating Dealer, nor any person associated with Participating Dealer, shall offer or sell Primary Shares in any jurisdiction except to investors who satisfy the investor suitability standards and minimum investment requirements under all of the following: (i) applicable provisions of the Prospectus; (ii) applicable laws of the jurisdiction of which such investor is a resident; (iii) applicable FINRA Conduct Rules; and (iv) the provisions of Section III.C. of the NASAA REIT Guidelines. Participating Dealer agrees to ensure that, in recommending the purchase, sale or exchange of Primary Shares to an investor, Participating Dealer, or a person associated with Participating Dealer, shall have reasonable grounds to believe, on the basis of information obtained from the investor (and thereafter maintained in the manner and for the period required by the Commission, any state securities commission, FINRA or the Company) concerning such investor’s age, investment objectives, other investments, financial situation and needs, and any other information known to Participating Dealer, or person associated with Participating Dealer, that (i) the investor is or will be in a financial position appropriate to enable the investor to realize to a significant extent the benefits described in the Prospectus, including the tax benefits to the extent they are a significant aspect of the Offered Shares, (ii) the investor has a fair market net worth sufficient to sustain the risks inherent in an investment in Primary Shares in the amount proposed, including loss and lack of liquidity of such investment, and (iii) an investment in Primary Shares is otherwise suitable for such investor. Participating Dealer further represents, warrants and covenants that Participating Dealer, or a person associated with Participating Dealer, will make every reasonable effort to determine the suitability and appropriateness of an investment in Primary Shares of each proposed investor solicited by a person associated with Participating Dealer by reviewing documents and records disclosing the basis upon which the determination as to suitability was reached as to each such proposed investor, whether such documents and records relate to accounts which have been closed, accounts which are currently maintained, or accounts hereafter established. Participating Dealer agrees to retain such documents and records in Participating Dealer’s records for a period of six years from the date of the applicable sale of Primary Shares, to otherwise comply with the record keeping requirements provided in Section XIV below and to make such documents and records available to (i) the Dealer Manager and the Company upon request, and (ii) representatives of the Commission, FINRA and applicable state securities administrators upon Participating Dealer’s receipt of an appropriate document subpoena or other appropriate request for documents from any such agency. Participating Dealer shall not purchase any Primary Shares for a discretionary account without obtaining the prior written approval of Participating Dealer’s customer and such customer’s completed and executed Subscription Agreement.

  • Constructability Review Prepare detailed interdisciplinary constructability review within Fourteen (14) days of receipt of the plans from the District that: 10.1.2.1.6.1 Ensures construction documents are well coordinated and reviewed for errors; 10.1.2.1.6.2 Identifies to the extent known, construction deficiencies and areas of concern; 10.1.2.1.6.3 Back-checks design drawings for inclusion of modifications; and 10.1.2.1.6.4 Provides the District with written confirmation that: 10.1.2.1.6.4.1 Requirements noted in the design documents prepared for the Project are consistent with and conform to the District's Project requirements and design standards. 10.1.2.1.6.4.2 Various components have been coordinated and are consistent with each other so as to minimize conflicts within or between components of the design documents.

  • Investigational Services This plan covers certain experimental or investigational services as described in this section. This plan covers clinical trials as required under R.I. General Law § 27-20-60. An approved clinical trial is a phase I, phase II, phase III, or phase IV clinical trial that is being performed to prevent, detect or treat cancer or a life-threatening disease or condition. In order to qualify, the clinical trial must be: • federally funded; • conducted under an investigational new drug application reviewed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA); or • a drug trial that is exempt from having such an investigational new drug application. To qualify to participate in a clinical trial: • you must be determined to be eligible, according to the trial protocol; • a network provider must have concluded that your participation would be appropriate; and • medical and scientific information must have been provided establishing that your participation in the clinical trial would be appropriate. If a network provider is participating in a clinical trial, and the trial is being conducted in the state in which you reside, you may be required to participate in the trial through the network provider. Coverage under this plan includes routine patient costs for covered healthcare services furnished in connection with participation in a clinical trial. The amount you pay is based on the type of service you receive. Coverage for clinical trials does not include: • the investigational item, device, or service itself; • items or services provided solely to satisfy data collection and that are not used in the direct clinical management; or • a service that is clearly inconsistent with widely accepted standards of care.

  • Fitness The Contractor warrants that any material supplied to the State shall fully conform to all requirements of the Contract and all representations of the Contractor, and shall be fit for all purposes and uses required by the Contract.

  • Design Standards Most recent edition of the “Owner’s Design Standards,” including any partial updates as may be directed by the Owner.

  • Upgrading Qualifications ‌ Where the Employer requires an employee to upgrade their skills or qualifications in order to operate or maintain new equipment, the cost of training and normal living and travel expenses as laid down in this agreement will be borne by the Employer.

  • Design XXX XXX XXXXX Plan and Aligned Budget

  • CHARACTERISTICS OF THE ACADEMY The characteristics of the Academy set down in Section 1(6) of the Academies Act 2010, are that:

  • Timeliness Time is of the essence in this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!