Common use of General Timeline Clause in Contracts

General Timeline. Specific time-lines in any particular year shall be created by the Instruction Office. August/ Sept Instruction/Student Service Office prepares and Distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected Sept./ October Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted November Student evaluations completed (instructors and librarians) Peer Evaluation Committee meets and evaluations completed; evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ December Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation January Instruction/Student Services Office prepares and distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected; Student evaluations completed (counselors) February Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process March Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted April Student evaluation completed (instructors) Peer evaluation completed; Peer Evaluation Committee meets; Evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ May Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation

General Timeline. Specific time-lines in any particular year shall be created by the Instruction Office. FIRST SEMESTER EVALUATIONS August/ Sept Instruction/Student Service Office prepares and Distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected Sept./ October Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process Process‌ Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted November Student evaluations completed (instructors and librarians) librarians)‌ Peer Evaluation Committee meets and evaluations completed; evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ December Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation SECOND SEMESTER EVALUATIONS‌ January Instruction/Student Services Office prepares and distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected; Student evaluations completed (counselors) February Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process March Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted submitted‌ April Student evaluation completed (instructors) Peer evaluation completed; Peer Evaluation Committee meets; Evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ May Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation

General Timeline. ‌ Specific time-lines in any particular year shall be created by the Instruction Office. FIRST SEMESTER EVALUATIONS August/ Sept Instruction/Student Service Office prepares and Distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected Sept./ October Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process Process‌ Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted November Student evaluations completed (instructors and librarians) librarians)‌ Peer Evaluation Committee meets and evaluations completed; evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ December Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation SECOND SEMESTER EVALUATIONS‌ January Instruction/Student Services Office prepares and distributes list of faculty participating in evaluation; Peer Evaluation Committee meets, chairperson elected; Student evaluations completed (counselors) February Orientation of all faculty for Peer Review; Selection of Evaluation Process March Peer Visitation/Video/ISW begins; Self-Evaluation submitted submitted‌ April Student evaluation completed (instructors) Peer evaluation completed; Peer Evaluation Committee meets; Evaluation summary and materials forwarded to appropriate ▇▇▇▇ May Appropriate ▇▇▇▇ meets with faculty member regarding evaluation