Common use of GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM Clause in Contracts

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 3 contracts

Samples: Shareholder Agreement (Intcomex, Inc.), Shareholder Agreement (Intcomex, Inc.), Shareholder Agreement (Intcomex, Inc.)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS TO BE WHOLLY PERFORMED IN SUCH STATE. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.1 OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Master Purchase and Sale Agreement (Phillips Petroleum Co), Master Purchase and Sale Agreement (Atlantic Richfield Co /De)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IS GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED WILL BE INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY WITHIN THAT STATE. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OR ANY NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF STATE COURT SITTING IN NEW YORK CITY (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY , AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.THAT

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Merger Agreement (Texas Regional Bancshares Inc), Merger Agreement (Texas Regional Bancshares Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. (i) THIS AGREEMENT AGREEMENT, AND ALL CLAIMS OR CAUSES OF ACTION (WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT) THAT MAY BE BASED UPON, ARISE OUT OF RELATE TO THIS AGREEMENT, OR THE NEGOTIATION, EXECUTION OR PERFORMANCE OF THIS AGREEMENT, SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH DELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW THEREOF. (ii) UNLESS AND UNTIL THE CHAPTER 11 CASES ARE COMMENCED, THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN THE COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT CHANCERY OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT STATE OF NEW YORK DELAWARE OR, IF SUCH THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE OR THE DELAWARE SUPREME COURT DETERMINES THAT, NOTWITHSTANDING SECTION 111 OF THE DGCL, THE COURT OF CHANCERY DOES NOT HAVE OR SHOULD NOT EXERCISE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIONJURISDICTION OVER SUCH MATTER, THE SUPREME SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR DELAWARE AND THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION FEDERAL COURTS OF THE CHOSEN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA LOCATED IN THE STATE OF DELAWARE SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH ANY DISPUTE THAT ARISES IN RESPECT OF THE INTERPRETATION AND ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN RESPECT OF THE TRANSACTIONS, AND HEREBY WAIVE, AND AGREE NOT TO ASSERT, AS A DEFENSE IN ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING FOR INTERPRETATION OR ENFORCEMENT HEREOF OR ANY SUCH DOCUMENT THAT IT IS NOT SUBJECT THERETO OR THAT SUCH ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING MAY NOT BE BROUGHT OR IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN SAID COURTS OR THAT VENUE THEREOF MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE OR THAT THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SUCH DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE ENFORCED IN OR BY SUCH COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTIONAND THE PARTIES IRREVOCABLY AGREE THAT ALL CLAIMS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE HEARD AND DETERMINED EXCLUSIVELY BY SUCH DELAWARE STATE OR FEDERAL COURT. THE PARTIES HEREBY CONSENT TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN AND GRANT ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE COURT JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THE PERSON OF SUCH PARTIES AND OVER THE SUBJECT MATTER OF SUCH DISPUTE AND AGREE THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT SECTION 9.10 OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF THEREOF. (iii) IF THE CHAPTER 11 CASES ARE COMMENCED, THE PARTIES IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE JURISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR SO LONG AS THE CHAPTER 11 CASES ARE PENDING SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH ANY DISPUTE THAT ARISES IN RESPECT OF THE INTERPRETATION AND (V) AGREES THAT ENFORCEMENT OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT AND THE DOCUMENTS REFERRED TO IN THIS AGREEMENT OR IN RESPECT OF THE TRANSACTIONS, AND HEREBY WAIVE, AND AGREE NOT TO ASSERT, AS A FINAL JUDGMENT DEFENSE IN ANY ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING FOR INTERPRETATION OR ENFORCEMENT HEREOF OR ANY SUCH ACTION DOCUMENT THAT IT IS NOT SUBJECT THERETO OR THAT SUCH ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING MAY NOT BE BROUGHT OR IS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN SAID COURTS OR THAT VENUE THEREOF MAY NOT BE APPROPRIATE OR THAT THIS AGREEMENT OR ANY SUCH DOCUMENT MAY NOT BE ENFORCED IN OR BY SUCH COURTS, AND THE PARTIES IRREVOCABLY AGREE THAT ALL CLAIMS WITH RESPECT TO SUCH ACTION, SUIT OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE HEARD AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS DETERMINED EXCLUSIVELY BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWBANKRUPTCY COURT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Voting and Support Agreement (Bonanza Creek Energy, Inc.), Voting and Support Agreement (HighPoint Resources Corp)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.11 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Cke Restaurants Inc), Stock Purchase Agreement (Verizon Wireless Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BYCONSTRUED, PERFORMED AND CONSTRUED ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKDELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ITS PRINCIPLES OR RULES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS TO THE EXTENT SUCH PRINCIPLES OR RULES WOULD REQUIRE OR PERMIT THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY HERETO (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, OR, IF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT DECLINES TO ACCEPT JURISDICTION OVER A PARTICULAR MATTER, THEN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND IF THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DECLINES JURISDICTION, THEN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DELAWARE (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN ANY RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, COURTS AND (III) WAIVES AGREES NOT TO BRING ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE ARISING OUT OF PROCESS) OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH ANY OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT (SUBJECT TO ANY APPEALS THEREFROM) IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT IT MAY LEGALLY AND EFFECTIVELY DO SO, ANY OBJECTION WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT IN THE CHOSEN COURTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 10.04. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY CONSENTS TO SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR NOTICES IN SECTION 10.11. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT TO SERVE PROCESS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Plan Support Agreement (Energy Future Competitive Holdings Co LLC), Plan Support Agreement (Energy Future Intermediate Holding CO LLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKNORTH CAROLINA, WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, NORTH CAROLINA OR THE SUPREME SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK NORTH CAROLINA LOCATED IN CHARLOTTE, NORTH CAROLINA (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING AGREES THAT VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IS PROPER IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.11 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 2 contracts

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Cke Restaurants Inc), Stock Purchase Agreement (Advantica Restaurant Group Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL AND ANY CLAIMS, CONTROVERSIES, DISPUTES, OR CAUSES OF ACTION (WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR OTHERWISE) BASED UPON, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE TO BE GOVERNED BY, BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES PARTY IRREVOCABLY AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING WILL NOT COMMENCE ANY ACTION ACTION, LITIGATION, OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF KIND OR RELATED DESCRIPTION, WHETHER IN LAW OR EQUITY, WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT, OR OTHERWISE, IN ANY WAY RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR ANY FORUM OTHER THAN THE COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK SITTING IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN NEW YORK COUNTY AND THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ORYORK, IF SUCH AND ANY APPELLATE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTIONFROM ANY THEREOF, THE SUPREME COURT AND EACH OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY (I) PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSSUCH COURTS AND AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY SUCH ACTION, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTIONLITIGATION, OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN NEW YORK STATE COURT, OR, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWFEDERAL COURT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Transaction Support Agreement (Cumulus Media Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCALIFORNIA WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN HEREIN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENTHEREBY, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN CENTRAL DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, CALIFORNIA OR THE SUPREME SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK CALIFORNIA FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK LOS ANGELES (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.8 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Union Texas Petroleum Holdings Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL AND ANY CLAIMS, CONTROVERSIES, DISPUTES, OR CAUSES OF ACTION (WHETHER IN CONTRACT OR TORT OR OTHERWISE) BASED UPON, ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT ARE TO BE GOVERNED BY, BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE APPLICABLE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED IN SUCH STATE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO THE CONFLICT OF LAWS PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH PARTY SUBMITS, FOR ITSELF AND ITS PROPERTY, TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT COURTS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR SITTING IN NEW YORK CITY IN THE COUNTY BOROUGH OF MANHATTAN AND OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT OF THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). YORK, AND ANY APPELLATE COURT FROM ANY THEREOF, IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF, RELATING TO, OR DURING A RESTRUCTURING, OR FOR RECOGNITION OR ENFORCEMENT OF ANY JUDGMENT, AND EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES PARTIES HERETO IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN RESPECT OF ANY OBJECTIONSUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN SUCH NEW YORK STATE COURT OR, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY APPLICABLE LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWFEDERAL COURT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Transaction Support Agreement (KLDiscovery Inc.)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 6 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT BREACHES OR THREATENED BREACHES OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT POSTING ANY BOND OR OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWUNDERTAKING.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Bill of Sale and Assignment and Assumption Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. Waiver of Trial By Jury. THE CORPORATE LAWS OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SHALL GOVERN ALL ISSUES CONCERNING THE RELATIVE RIGHTS OF THE COMPANY AND ITS STOCKHOLDERS. ALL QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE CONSTRUCTION, VALIDITY, ENFORCEMENT AND INTERPRETATION OF THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKDELAWARE. EACH THE COMPANY AND THE INVESTOR HEREBY IRREVOCABLY SUBMIT TO THE NON-EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE PARTIES STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS SITTING IN ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA OR SANTA XXXXX COUNTY, CALIFORNIA (AS MUTUALLY AGREED BY THE PARTIES) FOR THE ADJUDICATION OF ANY DISPUTE BROUGHT BY THE COMPANY OR ANY INVESTOR HEREUNDER, IN CONNECTION HEREWITH OR WITH ANY TRANSACTION CONTEMPLATED HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES OR DISCUSSED HEREIN (INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF ANY OF THE TRANSACTION DOCUMENTS), AND RENOUNCES HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVE, AND AGREE NOT TO ASSERT IN ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING BROUGHT BY THE COMPANY OR THE INVESTOR, ANY CLAIM THAT IT IS NOT PERSONALLY SUBJECT TO THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT SUCH COURT, OR THAT SUCH SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING IS IMPROPER. EACH PARTY, AFTER CONSULTING OR HAVING HAD THE OPPORTUNITY TO CONSULT WITH COUNSEL, EACH KNOWINGLY, VOLUNTARILY AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING INTENTIONALLY WAIVE IRREVOCABLY, ANY RIGHT TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF TO ENFORCE OR DEFEND ANY CLAIM RIGHTS ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR (INCLUDING WITH RESPECT TO THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT ENFORCEMENT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT ANY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICESTRANSACTION DOCUMENTS) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE TRIED BEFORE A COURT AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWNOT BEFORE A JURY. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, neither Party may commence any action or proceedings (other than temporary injunction) in respect of any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contained in or contemplated by this Agreement and the Ancillary Agreements unless such Party has used reasonable commercial efforts to negotiate and resolve the dispute with the other Party for 30 days. Each Party agrees that it will negotiate in good faith with the other Party through officers ranked Vice President or higher during such 30-day period in an effort to resolve any such dispute.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Conexant Systems Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. (a) THIS AGREEMENT AND ALL MATTERS ARISING FROM, OR RELATING TO, THIS AGREEMENT (WHETHER IN CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE) SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY DELAWARE IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR OF AMERICA WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW THAT WOULD REQUIRE THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT APPLICATION OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION, EXCEPT THAT THE SUPREME COURT FOLLOWING MATTERS SHALL BE GOVERNED BY AND IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE CAYMAN ISLANDS: THE MERGER, THE VESTING OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY UNDERTAKING, PROPERTY AND LIABILITIES OF NEW YORK THE *** Certain information on this page has been omitted and filed separately with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Confidential treatment has been requested with respect to the omitted portions. MERGER SUB IN THE SURVIVING COMPANY AND THE INTERNAL CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS OF THE COMPANY AND MERGER SUB (TOGETHER, THE “CHOSEN COURTSCAYMAN LAW MATTERS”). EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSEach party hereto agrees that it shall bring any Litigation with respect to any claim arising out of or related to this Agreement or the transactions contained in or contemplated by this Agreement exclusively in, subject to the last sentence of this Section 11.9.(a), (IIx) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSthe Chancery Court of the State of Delaware located in the State of Delaware, (IIIy) WAIVES ANY OBJECTIONif no such state court has proper jurisdiction, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAWthe Federal District Court for the District of Delaware located in Wilmington, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETODelaware or (z) if such federal court does not have jurisdiction, any state or federal court sitting in New Castle County, Delaware (together with the appellate courts thereof, the “Chosen Courts”), and solely in connection with claims arising under this Agreement or the transactions that are the subject of this Agreement (i) irrevocably submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Chosen Courts, (IVii) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 waives any objection to laying venue in any such action or proceeding in the Chosen Courts, (NOTICESiii) AND 7.7 waives any objection that the Chosen Courts are an inconvenient forum or do not have jurisdiction over any party hereto, (SERVICE OF PROCESSiv) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND agrees that service of process upon such party in any such action or proceeding shall be effective if notice is given in accordance with Section 11.1 of this Agreement, although nothing contained in this Agreement shall affect the right to serve process in any other manner permitted by Law and (Vv) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWagrees not to seek a transfer of venue on the basis that another forum is more convenient. Each party hereto agrees that it shall bring any Litigation exclusively relating to the Cayman Law Matters in the jurisdiction of the courts of the Cayman Islands. (b) Notwithstanding anything herein to the contrary, (i) nothing in this Section 11.9 shall prohibit any party from seeking or obtaining orders for conservatory or interim relief from any court of competent jurisdiction and (ii) each party hereto agrees that any Judgment issued by a Chosen Court may be recognized, recorded, registered or enforced in any jurisdiction in the world and waives any and all objections or defenses to the recognition, recording, registration or enforcement of such Judgment in any such jurisdiction.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Merger Agreement (Emergent BioSolutions Inc.)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 19 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT BREACHES OR THREATENED BREACHES OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT POSTING ANY BOND OR OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWUNDERTAKING.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Tt&c Transition Services Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE COMMONWEALTH OF NEW YORKVIRGINIA (WITHOUT REGARD TO ANY JURISDICTION’S CONFLICT-OF-LAWS PRINCIPLES) EXCLUSIVELY GOVERN ALL MATTERS BASED UPON, ARISING OUT OF, OR RELATING IN ANY WAY TO THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ALL DISPUTES, CLAIMS, OR CAUSES OF ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT AS WELL AS THE INTERPRETATION, CONSTRUCTION, PERFORMANCE, AND ENFORCEMENT OF THIS AGREEMENT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK VIRGINIA OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME CIRCUIT COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK WASHINGTON COUNTY, VIRGINIA (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY BUYER AND SELLERS HEREBY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS SUBMIT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES AGREE THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 SECTION 12.10 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES AGREE THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Purchase, Sale and Merger Agreement (Massey Energy Co)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY COURT") AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT (Ii) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSCOURT, (IIIiii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE COURT IS AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO DOES NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IViv) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.1 OF THIS AGREEMENT. -92- NY12528: 107491.4

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Canandaigua LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.12 OF THIS AGREEMENT. BUYER IRREVOCABLY DESIGNATES CT CORPORATION SYSTEM AS ITS AGENT AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND MAKING AN APPEARANCE ON ITS BEHALF IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR PROCEEDING AND TAKING ALL SUCH ACTS AS MAY BE ENFORCED NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON ORDER TO CONFER JURISDICTION OVER IT UPON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWCHOSEN COURTS AND BUYER STIPULATES THAT SUCH CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT IS IRREVOCABLE AND COUPLED WITH AN INTEREST.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Cole National Corp /De/)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAWS THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.06 OF THIS AGREEMENT. THE COMPANY IS EXECUTING THIS AMENDED AND MAY BE ENFORCED RESTATED MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT AND WILL ISSUE THE NOTES AND WARRANTS CONTEMPLATED HEREIN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR STATE OF ILLINOIS AND IS DELIVERING THIS AMENDED AND RESTATED MASTER LOAN AGREEMENT AND WILL DELIVER SUCH NOTES AND WARRANTS TO PHILIPS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWTHE STATE OF NEW YORK.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Master Loan Agreement (Navigation Technologies Corp)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT BREACHES OR THREATENED BREACHES OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT POSTING ANY BOND OR OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWUNDERTAKING.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Business Transition Services Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENTAGREEMENT (OTHER THAN ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DIAGEO), WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY BUYER AND SELLER HEREBY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS SUBMIT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES AGREE THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 SECTION 10.11 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES AGREE THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Diageo PLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ” ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.1 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT BREACHES OR THREATENED BREACHES OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT POSTING ANY BOND OR OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWUNDERTAKING.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BYCONSTRUED, PERFORMED AND CONSTRUED ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKDELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ITS PRINCIPLES OR RULES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS TO THE EXTENT SUCH PRINCIPLES OR RULES WOULD REQUIRE OR PERMIT THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY HERETO (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, OR, IF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT DECLINES TO ACCEPT JURISDICTION OVER A PARTICULAR MATTER, THEN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND IF THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DECLINES JURISDICTION, THEN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DELAWARE (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN ANY RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, COURTS AND (III) WAIVES AGREES NOT TO BRING ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE ARISING OUT OF PROCESS) OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH INANY OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT (SUBJECT TO ANY APPEALS THEREFROM) IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT IT MAY LEGALLY AND EFFECTIVELY DO SO, ANY OBJECTION WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT IN THE CHOSEN COURTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 10.04. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY CONSENTS TO SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR NOTICES IN SECTION 10.11. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT TO SERVE PROCESS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plan Support Agreement (Nextera Energy Inc)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.1 OF THIS AGREEMENT. EACH OF KODAK AND PURCHASER IRREVOCABLY DESIGNATES C.T. CORPORATION AS ITS AGENT AND ATTORNEY IN FACT FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND MAKING AN APPEARANCE ON ITS BEHALF IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR PROCEEDING AND FOR THE TAKING OF ALL SUCH ACTS AS MAY BE ENFORCED NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON ORDER TO CONFER JURISDICTION OVER IT BEFORE THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWCHOSEN COURTS AND PURCHASER STIPULATES THAT SUCH CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT IS IRREVOCABLE AND COUPLED WITH AN INTEREST.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Danka Business Systems PLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 7.2 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 7.6 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Shareholder Agreement (Intcomex Holdings, LLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENTAGREEMENT (OTHER THAN ACTIONS OR PROCEEDINGS AGAINST DANIEL), WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN EXCLUSIVEXX XX THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS"). EACH PARTY BUYER AND SELLER HEREBY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS SUBMIT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR -71- PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES AGREE THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 SECTION 10.11 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES AGREE THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Diageo PLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY BUYER AND SELLER HEREBY (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS SUBMIT TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES WAIVE ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES AGREE THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 SECTION 10.11 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES AGREE THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Intcomex Holdings, LLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BYCONSTRUED, PERFORMED AND CONSTRUED ENFORCED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKDELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ITS PRINCIPLES OR RULES OF CONFLICT OF LAWS TO THE EXTENT SUCH PRINCIPLES OR RULES WOULD REQUIRE OR PERMIT THE APPLICATION OF THE LAWS OF ANOTHER JURISDICTION. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY HERETO (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT, OR, IF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT DECLINES TO ACCEPT JURISDICTION OVER A PARTICULAR MATTER, THEN THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE, AND IF THE CHANCERY COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE DECLINES JURISDICTION, THEN ANY STATE OR FEDERAL COURT SITTING IN DELAWARE (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”) IN ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE AGREES THAT ALL CLAIMS IN ANY RESPECT OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY BE HEARD AND DETERMINED IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, COURTS AND (III) WAIVES AGREES NOT TO BRING ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE ARISING OUT OF PROCESS) OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH ANY OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) COURT. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT (SUBJECT TO ANY APPEALS THEREFROM) IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT IT MAY LEGALLY AND EFFECTIVELY DO SO, ANY OBJECTION WHICH IT MAY NOW OR HEREAFTER HAVE TO THE LAYING OF VENUE OF ANY SUIT, ACTION, OR PROCEEDING ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT IN THE CHOSEN COURTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE PROVISIONS OF THIS SECTION 10.04. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY WAIVES, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THE DEFENSE OF AN INCONVENIENT FORUM TO THE MAINTENANCE OF SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS. EACH OF THE PARTIES HERETO HEREBY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY CONSENTS TO SERVICE OF PROCESS IN THE MANNER PROVIDED FOR NOTICES IN SECTION 10.10. NOTHING IN THIS AGREEMENT WILL AFFECT THE RIGHT OF ANY PARTY TO THIS AGREEMENT TO SERVE PROCESS IN ANY OTHER MANNER PERMITTED BY LAW.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Plan Support Agreement (Sempra Energy)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 19 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND MAY (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE ENFORCED IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Tt&c Transition Services Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK TO THE EXTENT THAT SUCH BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 5.2 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Noncompetition Agreement (Loral Space & Communications LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKDELAWARE, WITHOUT GIVING EFFECT TO ANY CHOICE OR CONFLICT OF LAW PROVISION OR RULE, EXCEPT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA MANDATORILY APPLY. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE A UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK DELAWARE (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 12.3 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO TEMPORARY, PRELIMINARY AND PERMANENT INJUNCTIVE RELIEF TO PREVENT BREACHES OR THREATENED BREACHES OF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT, WITHOUT POSTING ANY BOND OR OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWUNDERTAKING.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Nyer Medical Group Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY (A) IN THE BANKRUPTCY COURT TO THE EXTENT THAT THE BANKRUPTCY COURT HAS JURISDICTION OVER SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING, AND (B) IN ALL OTHER CASES IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ) AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 22 OF THIS AGREEMENT AND (V) ACKNOWLEDGES THAT THE OTHER PARTIES WOULD BE IRREPARABLY DAMAGED IF ANY OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT ARE NOT PERFORMED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR SPECIFIC TERMS AND THAT ANY BREACH OF THIS AGREEMENT COULD NOT BE ADEQUATELY COMPENSATED IN ALL CASES BY MONETARY DAMAGES ALONE AND THAT, IN ADDITION TO ANY OTHER RIGHT OR REMEDY TO WHICH A PARTY MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT ENTITLED, AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, IT SHALL BE ENTITLED TO ENFORCE ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED PROVISION OF THIS AGREEMENT BY APPLICABLE LAW.A DECREE OF SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE AND TO

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Business Transition Services Agreement (Intelsat LTD)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REFERENCE TO THE CHOICE OF LAW PRINCIPLES THEREOF. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES XXXXXXXXXXX XX XXX XXXXXX XXXXXX DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 10.11 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Stock Purchase Agreement (Verizon Wireless Inc)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS THE AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, BY THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKYORK WITHOUT REGARD TO PRINCIPLES OF CONFLICTS OF LAW. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITYAGREEMENT AND THE ANCILLARY AGREEMENTS, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, OR THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK COUNTY (THE "CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY ") AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, THE SUPPLY AGREEMENT AND THE ANCILLARY AGREEMENTS (Ii) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (IIii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (IIIiii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IViv) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.1 OF THIS AGREEMENT. KODAK AND PURCHASER IRREVOCABLY DESIGNATE C.T. CORPORATION AS THEIR AGENT AND ATTORNEY-IN-FACT FOR THE ACCEPTANCE OF SERVICE OF PROCESS AND MAKING AN APPEARANCE ON THEIR BEHALF IN ANY SUCH CLAIM OR PROCEEDING AND FOR THE TAKING OF ALL SUCH ACTS AS MAY BE ENFORCED NECESSARY OR APPROPRIATE IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON ORDER TO CONFER JURISDICTION OVER THEM BEFORE THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAW.CHOSEN COURTS AND KODAK AND PURCHASER STIPULATE THAT SUCH CONSENT AND APPOINTMENT IS IRREVOCABLE AND COUPLED WITH AN INTEREST. 117 124

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Asset Purchase Agreement (Danka Business Systems PLC)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE GOVERNED BY(a) This Agreement and the legal relations between the Parties shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the Laws of the State of Texas without regard to principles of conflicts of law which would require the application of the Laws of another jurisdiction. (b) The Parties hereby irrevocably submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the state and federal courts located in Houston, AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITHXxxxxx County, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKTexas and appropriate appellate courts therefrom, and each Party hereby irrevocably agrees that all claims in respect of such dispute, controversy or claim may be heard and determined in such courts. The Parties hereby irrevocably waive, to the fullest extent permitted by applicable Laws, any objection that they may now or hereafter have to the laying of venue of any such dispute, controversy or claim brought in any such court or any defense of inconvenient forum for the maintenance of such dispute, controversy or claim. Each Party agrees that a judgment in any such dispute may be enforced in other jurisdictions by suit on the judgment or in any other manner provided by applicable Law. (c) EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT PARTY ACKNOWLEDGES AND AGREES THAT ANY CONTROVERSY WHICH MAY ARISE UNDER THIS AGREEMENT IS LIKELY TO INVOLVE COMPLICATED AND DIFFICULT ISSUES AND, THEREFORE, EACH SUCH PARTY IRREVOCABLY AND UNCONDITIONALLY WAIVES ANY RIGHT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM LEGAL ACTION ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED RELATING TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”)TRANSACTIONS. EACH PARTY CERTIFIES AND ACKNOWLEDGES THAT (Ii) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS NO REPRESENTATIVE OF ANY OTHER PARTY HAS REPRESENTED, EXPRESSLY OR OTHERWISE, THAT SUCH OTHER PARTY WOULD NOT SEEK TO ENFORCE THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION FOREGOING WAIVER IN THE EVENT OF THE CHOSEN COURTSA LEGAL ACTION, (IIii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO SUCH PARTY HAS CONSIDERED THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTSIMPLICATIONS OF THIS WAIVER, (IIIiii) WAIVES ANY OBJECTIONSUCH PARTY MAKES THIS WAIVER VOLUNTARILY, AND (iv) SUCH PARTY HAS BEEN INDUCED TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF ENTER INTO THIS AGREEMENT OR BY, AMONG OTHER THINGS, THE MUTUAL WAIVERS AND CERTIFICATIONS IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWTHIS Section 10.9(c).

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Omnibus Agreement (NextDecade Corp.)

GOVERNING LAW; SUBMISSION TO JURISDICTION; SELECTION OF FORUM. THIS AGREEMENT SHALL BE IS GOVERNED BY, AND CONSTRUED WILL BE INTERPRETED IN ACCORDANCE WITH, THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORKCALIFORNIA APPLICABLE TO CONTRACTS MADE AND TO BE PERFORMED ENTIRELY WITHIN THAT STATE. EACH OF THE PARTIES HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVES AND RENOUNCES THE JURISDICTION OF ANY MEXICAN COURT AND PARTY HERETO AGREES THAT IT SHALL BRING ANY ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN RESPECT OF ANY CLAIM ARISING OUT OF OR RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTAINED IN OR CONTEMPLATED BY THIS AGREEMENT, WHETHER IN TORT OR CONTRACT OR AT LAW OR IN EQUITY, EXCLUSIVELY IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK OR, IF SUCH CALIFORNIA OR ANY CALIFORNIA STATE COURT DOES NOT HAVE SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION, THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK FOR THE COUNTY OF NEW YORK SITTING IN SAN FRANCISCO (THE “CHOSEN COURTS”). EACH PARTY , AND SOLELY IN CONNECTION WITH CLAIMS ARISING UNDER THIS AGREEMENT OR THE TRANSACTIONS THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS AGREEMENT (I) IRREVOCABLY SUBMITS TO THE EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION OF THE CHOSEN COURTS, (II) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION TO LAYING VENUE IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE CHOSEN COURTS, (III) WAIVES ANY OBJECTION, TO THE FULLEST EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW, OBJECTION THAT THE CHOSEN COURTS ARE AN INCONVENIENT FORUM OR DO NOT HAVE JURISDICTION OVER ANY PARTY HERETO, HERETO AND (IV) AGREES THAT MAILING SERVICE OF PROCESS OR OTHER PAPERS IN CONNECTION WITH ANY UPON SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING IN THE MANNER PROVIDED IN SECTIONS 7.3 (NOTICES) AND 7.7 (SERVICE OF PROCESS) OF THIS AGREEMENT OR IN SUCH OTHER MANNER AS MAY BE PERMITTED BY LAW SHALL BE VALID AND SUFFICIENT SERVICE THEREOF AND (V) AGREES THAT A FINAL JUDGMENT PARTY IN ANY SUCH ACTION OR PROCEEDING SHALL BE CONCLUSIVE AND MAY BE ENFORCED EFFECTIVE IF NOTICE IS GIVEN IN OTHER JURISDICTIONS BY SUIT ON THE JUDGMENT OR IN ANY OTHER MANNER PROVIDED BY APPLICABLE LAWACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 9.06 OF THIS AGREEMENT.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Merger Agreement (Mid-State Bancshares)

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!