Common use of Hazard Mitigation Clause in Contracts

Hazard Mitigation. Outcome: Promote resiliency through inclusion of hazard mitigation. 1. When the Applicant is restoring a facility to pre-disaster function, size, capacity, and location, FEMA evaluates the proposed hazard mitigation SOW and cost-effectiveness based on the criteria in Chapter 2.VII.C of the PAPPG. 2. When the Applicant is restoring the function, but changing the pre-disaster capacity of a facility (Improved Project), the proposed hazard mitigation SOW is developed based onthe actual SOW to be implemented; however, the cost-effectiveness is evaluated based on the fixed-cost amount accepted for the pre-disaster restoration SOW. If the capacity is increased, the proposed hazard mitigation SOW and cost is limited to the SOW and cost necessary to mitigate to the pre-disaster capacity of the damaged facility. 3. Applicants must complete the approved hazard mitigation in order to retain the fixed-cost amount accepted for hazard mitigation.

Hazard Mitigation. Outcome: Promote resiliency through inclusion of hazard mitigation. 1. When the Applicant is restoring a facility to pre-disaster function, size, capacity, and location, FEMA evaluates the proposed hazard mitigation SOW and cost-effectiveness based on the criteria in Chapter 2.VII.C of the PAPPG. 2. When the Applicant is restoring the function, but changing the pre-disaster capacity of a facility (Improved Project), the proposed hazard mitigation SOW is developed based onthe on the actual SOW to be implemented; however, the cost-effectiveness is evaluated based on the fixed-cost amount accepted for the pre-disaster restoration SOW. If the capacity is increased, the proposed hazard mitigation SOW and cost is limited to the SOW and cost necessary to mitigate to the pre-disaster capacity of the damaged facility. 3. Applicants must complete the approved hazard mitigation in order to retain the fixed-cost amount accepted for hazard mitigation.