Indirect Benefits Sample Clauses

Indirect Benefits. Indirect benefits include greater public confidence and program support. Automation promotes cost efficiencies and program integrity, increasing the taxpaying public’s confidence in and support for these public assistance programs. Reductions in erroneous payments and increased collections enable States and the Federal Government to devote more dollars to intended recipients. All fifty States, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico (hereafter referred to collectively as states) participate in PARIS. Comparative Data for the four previous matches indicate a substantial amount of PARIS match activity: File (out of 52 states) SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (50 states) 64,666,326 512,525 Veterans (32 states) 7,855,563 303,923 Federal (42 states) 9,310,471 58,856 Total matched SSNs 875,304 File (out of 52 states) SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (48 states) 62,350,570 503,013 Veterans (39 states) 9,479,423 315,844 Federal (34 states) 9,317,190 56,364 Total matched SSNs 875,221 File (out of 52 states) SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (48 states) 63,171,967 555,030 Veterans (42 states) 9,380,600 393,993 Federal (27 states) 7,150,333 32,234 Total matched SSNs 981,257 File (out of 52 states) SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (49 states) 65,937,519 673,945 Veterans (42 states) 9,290,415 405,337 Federal (0 states) 0 0 Total matched SSNs 1,079,282 Note: The Federal match was not conducted in February 2019. DoD Civilian Personnel 750,840 DoD Civilian Pay 785,233 Active Duty Personnel 1,373,120 Military Active Duty Pay 1,367,323 Military Reserve Pay 978,112 Reserve Personnel 1,241,552 Non-Appropriated Fund Civilian Monthly 117,574 Military Retired Pay 2,363,691 Military Retiree Survivor Pay 333,026 Total: 9,310,471 Reported experiences received by ACF from states with regard to benefits accrued from participating in PARIS and utilizing the Veterans Match include some of the following: New York State, in State Fiscal Year 2018 (April 2018 through March 2019), closed or removed active individuals from 8,593 Public Assistance cases identified on the PARIS Match. The cost savings for these individuals was $49,351,452. These savings are calculated by determining the average annual cost of an individual in each of the following case types - Federally funded Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) PA cases (which can include Medicaid and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) Benefits), New York funded Safety Net PA cases (which can...
Sample 1Sample 2See All (7)
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Indirect Benefits. Greater Public Confidence and Program Support: Automation promotes cost efficiencies and program integrity so that the taxpaying public may have confidence that efforts to recover funds and prevent further liability on the part of the States and Federal Government is subject to every reasonable effort. Reductions in erroneous payments and increase collections enable States and the Federal Government to devote more dollars to recipients. All fifty States, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico participate in PARIS. Comparative Data for the four previous matches indicate a substantial amount of PARIS match activity: File SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (47 states) 63,643,541 519,055 Veterans (46 states) 6,910,955 372,368 Federal (38 states) 10,068,695 (estimate) 79,828 File SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (43 states) 52,454,831 444,800 Veterans (42 states) 6,709,144 328,626 Federal (35 states) 10,068,695 (estimate) 92,722 File SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (51 states) 57,464,681 508,237 Veterans (48 states) 6,600,566 365,420 Federal (44 states) 10,068,695 (estimate) 85,221 File SSNs submitted Matched SSNs Interstate (42 states) 47,967,238 358,052 Veterans (40 states) 6,491,488 314,551 Federal (36 states) 10,068,695 (estimate) 82,769 The Feb 2013 Federal file breakdown was: Non-Appropriate Fund 3,610 Military Reserve 21,600 Military Retired 11,477 Military Active Duty 9,865 Civilian Retired 27,096 Civilian DOD 3,173 Military Retiree Survivor 6,288 Total Matches 79,828 In 2007, the Administration for Children and Families (ACF) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) contracted with Altarum Institute (Altarum) to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of the Public Assistance Reporting Information System (PARIS). The purpose of this study was to develop and populate cost-benefit models that could be used to assess the potential impact of PARIS on State program expenditures and integrity. The PARIS Cost-Benefit Analysis Final Report is posted on the PARIS website. The diversity of States’ approaches to PARIS, combined with a lack of tracking results, made it difficult to create a single uniform approach to calculating PARIS costs and benefits. However, models were developed that would allow States to use a consistent approach to calculating costs and benefits for specific PARIS activities, such as managing clients who moved from one State to another but did not report the move, or clients that did not report income from Fede...
Sample 1
Indirect Benefits. For purposes of this Agreement, the term “Indirect Benefits” means and includes the following: (a) non-cash compensation or other non-cash benefits, gifts, promotions, consideration or other advantages received by Manager or an affiliate of Manager from third parties in connection with the general property management business or other activities of Manager or an affiliate of Manager, including third parties with whom Manager may deal with in the performance of its duties under this Agreement; and (b) benefits received by Manager or an affiliate of Manager by virtue of any equity interest held by Manager or such affiliate in third parties with whom Manager may deal with in the performance of its ditties under this Agreement; and (c) other indirect benefits arising from the business of Manager, including its activities under this Agreement, which do not constitute cash and trade discounts, refunds or credits directly resulting from and based upon supplies or equipment purchased by Manager for or on behalf of Owner under this Agreement. Owner understands and recognizes that from time to time during the Term, Manager or an affiliate of Manager, may receive or obtain such Indirect Benefits and Manager or such affiliate shall be entitled to retain all such Indirect Benefits for its own account; it being understood by Owner that Manager takes the value of such Indirect Benefits into account in pricing its property management services generally. Nothing contained herein is intended to eliminate Manager’s duties under Section 3.7 of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Indirect Benefits. Subject to certain thresholds, the Japanese Government procurement market will be open to Australian exporters. Services providers will benefit through receiving treatment equal to Japanese firms and steps being taken to develop frameworks for mutual recognition in respect of professional services qualifications. Download the full JAEPA text HERE. Apart from JAEPA, Japan currently has 13 other free trade agreements in force with other nations. These are:
Sample 1
Indirect Benefits. These are services performed by the concessionaire that benefit the public or improvements made to the Federal estate by the concessionaire.
Sample 1
Indirect Benefits. To further expand upon consideration of indirect or secondary benefits, another key component is the connection between our mission and the economic well-being of the communities in the region. Some of the benefits to underserved communities associated with our work may not be able to be tracked and measured in accordance with established funding guidelines and tracking mechanisms. We believe it should be acknowledged as part of the overarching Equity Strategy that there will be indirect and secondary benefits to all the communities that rely upon the natural resources of the region, not only for economic, but also social and cultural well-being. APNEP plans to explore ways to leverage new and existing data sources to make the best possible predictions of how projects focusing on indirect benefits may provide direct benefits to underserved communities. An economic valuation report commissioned by APNEP estimated economic benefits exceeding $475 million for commercial sectors that depend directly on the region’s natural resources, including agriculture, forestry and commercial fishing. In addition, these sectors directly employ approximately 36,000 workers in the region, generating more than $672 million in wages each year. Benefits to households were measured in terms of outdoor recreational activities and the aesthetic value of natural resources. The report estimates benefits of more than $3.7 billion from activities such as fishing, hunting, wildlife viewing and visits to national seashores and state parks. Indirect benefits such as the removal of air pollutants by tree cover in the watershed were also evaluated and estimated to save $81 million in human health costs each year. As mentioned previously, we anticipate the use of NEPORT data for the baseline that EPA Headquarters is developing will present challenges in comparing new projects and developing and tracking metrics associated with the benefits of BIL funds. Not only were many of these projects not created or implemented with benefits to disadvantaged communities in mind, but many were implemented with non-320 funds, are partner led, and developed with different goals and objectives in mind. In fact, many of the projects APNEP has been engaged with that would fit would not have been reported in NEPORT, since community engagement and coordination would not necessarily have included a habitat protection and restoration component that meets the NEPORT reporting requirements. In addition, though all...
Sample 1

Related to Indirect Benefits

  • Benefits 17.01 The Employer agrees, during the term of the Collective Agreement, to contribute towards the premium coverage of participating eligible employees in the active employ of the Employer under the insurance plans set out below subject to their respective terms and conditions including any enrolment requirements: (a) The Employer shall pay one hundred percent (100%) of the billed premium for OHIP and will provide for payment of any reimposition of OHIP type premiums. (b) The Employer agrees to contribute 100% of the billed premiums towards coverage of eligible employees in the active employ of the Employer under an Extended Health Care Plan, with a Drug Card providing for a $7.50 cap on re-imbursement on the dispensing fee and a $1.00 deductible per prescription. Positive Enrolment provision to be included. Effective October 31, 2011, reimbursement for prescribed drugs covered by the plan will be based on the cost of the lowest priced therapeutically equivalent generic version of the drug, unless there is a documented adverse reaction to the generic drug or unless the beneficiary’s doctor stipulates that the generic drug is not an alternative, in which case the reimbursement will be for the prescribed drug. In addition to the standard benefits, coverage will include hearing aids in the amount of $300/life time; and vision care in the amount of $300 every 24 months, with the right of the beneficiary to access the benefit one time only for corrective laser eye surgery. The Plan will include a paramedical coverage bank which covers the following services from paramedical providers who are licensed or registered in the province of Canada in which the services are provided: • Osteopath • Chiropractor • Podiatrist or Chiropodist • Naturopath or Homeopath • Audiologist • Physiotherapist • Psychologist • Speech Therapist • Acupuncturist • Massage Therapist • Ophthalmologist or Optometrist to a maximum of $750/insured person/year. Out-of-country benefits for all homes. It is also understood that coverage will include dependant children up to and including age 21. (c) The Employer agrees to contribute 100% of the billed premium towards coverage of eligible employees in the active employ of the Employer under a group life insurance plan providing for a minimum of twice annual (2x) salary. (d) The Employer agrees to contribute 50% of the billed premiums towards coverage of eligible employees in the active employ of the Employer under a Dental Plan (which is comparable to the Blue Cross #9 Dental Plan) or comparable coverage with another carrier; based on a one (1) year ODA fee schedule lag providing the balance of the monthly premiums are paid by the employees through payroll deductions. The Dental plan shall provide for Fluoride treatments only for persons under the age of 18 years and dental recall on a nine (9) month basis for persons 18 years and older. It is also understood that coverage will include dependant children up to and including age 21. (a) Notwithstanding Articles 14 and 17, full-time employees who continue to be employed past age 65 shall be eligible for the following benefits under the same cost sharing basis as active employees: • 14.01 (a) • 17.01 (b) EHC • 17.01 (c) Reduce life insurance by 50% to the equivalent of one times (1x) salary • 17.01 (d) Dental (b) Effective date of ratification, full-time employees who continue to be employed past age 65 shall be given a one-time option to continue with the benefits as described in part (a) above, or the employee can elect to receive the percentage-in-lieu as per Appendix “A” for all items now included in the payment. For clarity, once the full-time employee has elected to no longer receive benefits, the employee will not be able to participate in the benefit plans at a subsequent date. (c) In any event, once an employee reaches age 70 and she continues to be employed she shall automatically be placed on the percentage-in-lieu as per Appendix “A” for all items now included in the payment. 17.03 The Employer shall provide to each person a copy of the current information booklets for those benefits provided under this Article. The Union shall be provided with a current copy of the Master Policy. It is clearly understood that the Employer's obligation pursuant to this Collective Agreement is to provide the insurance coverage bargained for. Any problem with respect to the insurer acknowledging or honouring any claims is a matter as between the employee and the insurer. The Employer will notify the Union if it intends to change the Insurance Carrier. Any grievance arising from the interpretation, application and/or administration of the health and welfare benefits shall be resolved as follows: (a) The Union or Employer shall file a written grievance within ten (10) days of its learning that an alleged problem exists. For insured benefits, a copy of the grievance shall be forwarded to the insurers. (b) Within ten (10) days of filing a grievance, the parties shall meet with a view to resolving the grievance. (c) If the grievance is not resolved, as aforesaid, or if the parties fail to meet within the time limited, then the grievance shall be referred to a single arbitrator to be selected alternately from the list of arbitrators hereinafter provided. (d) The arbitrator shall, in his/her discretion, determine the most expeditious manner of resolving the dispute consistent with affording each party a reasonable opportunity to present its case. The arbitrator may dispense with an oral hearing; receive only written submissions; hear evidence or submissions by conference call; receive evidence by affidavit and/or take such other steps as may be in his/her opinion appropriate. (e) The arbitrator may in his/her discretion attempt to assist the parties in settling the dispute. (f) The arbitrators for this process shall be Xxxxx Xxxxxxxx and Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxxxxx. If additional arbitrators are necessary, Xxxx Xxxxx shall remain seized to appoint these, if the parties are unable to agree. (g) The arbitrator shall render a decision with ten (10) days of completion of the hearing. Written reasons are not required. Oral decisions confirmed in writing may be given. (h) The fees and expenses of the arbitrator shall be shared equally by the Employer and the Union in cases where the benefit is self-insured and by the insurers and the Union where the benefit is insured. (i) This process shall commence immediately for all self-insured benefits. Upon the expiry of any contracts of insurance for benefits, this process shall then apply to insured benefits. It is the responsibility of the Employer to obtain insurance which includes an agreement by the insurer to be bound by the process. If the Employer fails to obtain the agreement of an insurer, the grievance shall proceed as though it is a self-insured benefit. (j) The parties agree that the decision of an arbitrator hereunder shall be final and binding and shall not be appealed or judicially reviewed by either party. The purpose of waiving any appeal rights or rights of judicial review is to avoid the cost and expense associated with the exercise of these rights. (k) The decision of the arbitrator shall not have any value as a precedent in a subsequent case. (l) If in the opinion of any party a grievance raises an issue which should be decided by the form of grievance arbitration provided by the Collective Agreement for all other grievances, upon the consent of all parties or if such consent is not forthcoming, with the approval of Xxxx Xxxxx, such approval to be obtained by a conference call, the grievance shall be transferred to the ordinary grievance/arbitration process. 17.04 The Employer may substitute another carrier for any of the foregoing plans (other than O.H.I.P.) provided that the level of benefits conferred thereby are not decreased. The Employer will advise the Union of any change in carrier or underwriter at least sixty (60) days prior to implementing a change in carrier. 17.05 The Employer agrees, during the term of the Collective Agreement, to contribute on behalf of participating eligible full-time employees who have completed three

  • Retirement Benefits Due to either investment or employment during the marriage, either the Husband or Wife: (check one)

  • Entitlement to Benefits Notwithstanding the other provisions of this Agreement, a benefit under this Agreement shall not be granted in respect of an item of income if it is reasonable to conclude, having regard to all relevant facts and circumstances, that obtaining that benefit was one of the principal purposes of any arrangement or transaction that resulted directly or indirectly in that benefit, unless it is established that granting that benefit in these circumstances would be in accordance with the object and purpose of the relevant provisions of this Agreement.

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!