INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. Oregon public universities and community colleges, under advisement from OTAC and HECC, will build an alert mechanism into their curriculum review process for changes related to courses, programs, or admission that may impact the MTM. • The institution proposing a change in required or pre-requisite courses, with potential to impact lower-division course taking will alert their Registrar and Major Transfer Map group to review the change. • If the proposed change creates a need to modify lower-division course taking as defined in the existing MTM, the OTAC representative from the particular MTM group will bring the issue to OTAC for review to determine if updates need to be made to the agreement. • All public higher education institutions who are signatories of the agreement are expected to stay in alignment with the approved MTM. Changes to courses included in the MTM that will affect their transferability must be approved by the MTM group and OTAC before taking effect. • MTM groups are expected to meet annually or as needed to ensure continued alignment and the effective dates will be reflected in each MTM. Catalog rights follow the MTM. • If valid reasons exist that prevent sufficient alignment, a given institution may have to exit the agreement. In such cases, the Xxxxxxx of the university must notify OTAC and work out an effective timeline for leaving the agreement such that the university honors the catalog year guarantees and provides a workable teach-out plan so students in the pipeline are held harmless.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. A. Each Community College and Four-Year Institution will designate an institutional staff person to provide oversight of the Reverse Transfer program.
B. Each Community College and Four-Year Institution will make all reasonable efforts to ensure all the pertinent institutional personnel and offices (e.g., Admissions, Advising, Records, Registrar offices and faculty) are aware of the Agreement and of their responsibilities to facilitate it.
C. Each Community College shall take reasonable steps to inform current students about the opportunity to obtain an Associate degree through this Agreement.
D. Each Community College shall have a procedure through which a student seeking a reverse transfer can appeal a decision that the student believes is not consistent with this Agreement. The procedure shall be published in the institution’s catalog, student handbook, and website. A student who wishes to appeal a decision must file that appeal with the Community College through that procedure. Such appeal must be submitted by the student within 30 days of receiving the decision in question. The Community College will provide a decision to the student within 60 days of receipt of the appeal. The decision of the Community College is final.
E. Each Community College shall provide that college’s specific standards under II.A., above, to the New Jersey Presidents’ Council for publication on the NJ Transfer website. Each Community College shall also be responsible for providing updates to those standards to the New Jersey Presidents’ Council in the event that those standards are changed.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. A. Each SUS and FCS institution will designate an institutional staff person to provide oversight for the reverse transfer program.
B. Each SUS and FCS institution will create a webpage containing information about the reverse transfer program.
C. Each SUS and FCS institution will provide academic counseling to students.
D. Each SUS and FCS institution will ensure that all educational records created, disclosed, or maintained pursuant to the terms of this articulation agreement are confidential and shall be created, disclosed, and maintained pursuant to the requirements of FERPA and applicable state laws.
E. Each SUS institution will maintain records on the number of students who met the eligibility criteria and the number of transcripts sent to FCS institutions.
F. Each FCS institution will maintain records on the number of students evaluated, the number of students who were awarded an AA degree, and the number of students who were not awarded an AA degree.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. First, Oregon public universities and community colleges, will follow OAR 715-025-0055 to modify a MTM CAP. The OAR reads:
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. 5.1. The registration of the doctoral student is conducted at IOSUD USAMV Cluj-Napoca, which ensures the fulfillment of specific conditions for conducting doctoral studies (admission, signing and drawing up of the tuition contract, the implementation of the individual training plan, the examinations, the granting of scholarships, the collection of fees tuition, defense of the thesis, preparation of the doctoral file, etc.) in accordance with the legislation in force in Romania and with the university's own regulations.
5.2. The two institutions, tutelary and co-tutelary, will ensure all the necessary conditions during the periods in which the doctoral student is in respective institution, so that they can carry out an academic and research activity appropriate to the theme of the doctoral thesis, under the direct guidance of the doctoral supervisor.
5.3. The research activity of the doctoral student, during the period when they are in the tutelary/co-tutelary institution will be carried out according to the legal provisions that regulate this activity in the institution where it is located, aiming at the protection of research themes, research results and the conditions for publishing these results in specialty magazines.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. Oregon public universities and community colleges, will follow ORS 715-025-0055 to modify a MTM CAP. The OAR states: • An institution considering a course or curriculum change, including the creation of a new academic program, that impacts or may be impacted by an adopted CAP, shall notify the Transfer Council and Commission of the proposed course or curriculum change prior to the implementation of such change. • If the change proposed as provided in section (1) of this rule is the creation of a new program, the Commission shall determine whether the program is subject to the requirements of an existing CAP • Pursuant to the annual review as provided in OAR 715-025-0050, or upon notification from an institution as provided in section (1) of this rule, the Council shall determine if modification to the CAP is required. • The Council shall appoint a subcommittee for the purpose of considering any modifications and making recommendations for modifying the CAP to the Commission. • Any modifications to a CAP shall be made in accordance to the processes and requirements established in OAR 715-025-0020(2) to (4) and OAR 715-025-0030(2) and (3). • An institution shall not implement any modification to a course or curriculum that would have the effect of causing the institution to be out of compliance with obligations under a CAP unless a modification is approved through the process established in this rule, or the institution receives an exemption as provided in OAR 715-025-0060.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. A. During the period of this Agreement, each party will send notice to the other at least 4 months prior to the implementation of any curricular changes that might affect this Agreement.
B. The parties will use reasonable efforts to make appropriate personnel in their respective institutions aware of this Agreement and encourage them to support it. Such persons include admissions staff, counselors and appropriate faculty. Berkeley’s Office of Admissions will supply Herkimer with promotional literature, which will be made available to students.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. Institution is solely responsible for (a) Institution’s and its Users’ use of and access to the Service, including Collections generated from the use of the Service; and (b) any improper or unauthorized use of the Service by Institution or its Users; and notwithstanding any other provision of this Agreement, Institution shall be responsible for payment of all amounts it incurs arising from the foregoing. The provisions in Clause 9 (Indemnification) of the Archive-It Service Agreement terms and
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. Prior to entering into this Consulting Agreement with the COMPANY, CONSULTANT was and is employed by ST. COMPANY recognizes that in connection with CONSULTANT'S employment, CONSULTANT'S primary responsibility is to ST and that in connection with such employment CONSULTANT has entered into an agreement relating to ownership of patent rights and other matters with ST. CONSULTANT will only perform services for the COMPANY within the limits allowed by ST. It is agreed and acknowledged by both parties that COMPANY does not seek to have CONSULTANT violate any of CONSULTANT'S obligations to ST, but seeks to limit ownership rights of any COMPANY-related intellectual property solely to COMPANY or CONSULTANT. CONSULTANT therefore agrees to limit his consultation services solely to those that would not be in conflict with his obligations to ST as described herein above. It is understood that there is currently no conflict between ST and the development of CytoGenix ssDNA expression technology, CytoGenix synDNA production technology, or other CytoGenix technology which is ongoing or planned, and therefore does not directly conflict with or interfere with the interests of ST and therefore should pose no conflict problems between the two companies.
INSTITUTIONAL OBLIGATIONS. A. During the period of this Agreement, each party will send notice to the other prior to the implementation of any curricular changes that might affect this Agreement.
B. The parties will use reasonable efforts to make appropriate personnel in their respective institutions aware of this Agreement and encourage them to support it. Such persons include admissions staff, counselors and appropriate faculty. Berkeley’s Office of Admissions will supply RVCC with promotional literature, which will be made available to students.
