Common use of Intercept Devices Clause in Contracts

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all Page 37 of 357 inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all Page 37 of 357 inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill xxxx the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill xxxx the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T SBC TEXAS is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&TSBC TEXAS; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T SBC TEXAS should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T SBC TEXAS is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T SBC TEXAS immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T SBC TEXAS not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T SBC TEXAS shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a an CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T SBC TEXAS shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T SBC TEXAS shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T SBC TEXAS may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 3471 of 316 331260 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request.. Page 41 of 301 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a an CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a an CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing surveillance on the other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. 314 enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill xxxx the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.

Intercept Devices. 16.1.1 Local and federal law enforcement agencies may periodically request information or assistance from either Party. When either Party receives a request associated with a customer of CLEC, the receiving Party will advise the law enforcement agency (LEA) that 1) this is a resold service; 2) AT&T is the underlying local service provider and CLEC provides the billing and customer care to its end-user customers; 3) an interception access point will be provided by AT&T; 4) both carriers should be named and served in the legal demand. AT&T should be named and served to provide the LEA with all Page 44 of 396 inbound and outbound call detail records, the intercept access point and all technical assistance. CLEC should be named and served in the legal demand to provide verification of customer billing information (name and address) and copies of customer billing records; and 5) AT&T is responsible for billing any charges for services incurred by the LEA. However, if the LEA insists that AT&T immediately provide any requested information in its possession, and/or insists that AT&T not communicate with any other party about the request for information, including CLEC, then AT&T shall be permitted to comply with the LEA’s valid request. 16.1.2 Should either Party receive a court order authorizing orderauthorizing surveillance on the onthe other Party’s End User, the Party in receipt shall unless prohibited by the terms of such court order refer such order to the Party that serves the End User. Should a court order pertain to a CLEC customer (trap & trace, pen register or wiretap) or an ALS Type II customer (pen register or wiretap), the Party in receipt will request the issuing authority to amend the order, naming both Parties, and serve both Parties concurrently. AT&T shall provide law Page 37 of 316 AT&T ILLINOIS/.NEW TALK, INC. enforcement with all necessary assistance, including plant information and local loop access, to facilitate implementation of court orders pertaining to pen registers or wiretaps. Additionally, AT&T shall provision on its equipment trap & trace orders pertaining to CLEC Local customers. As specified in Section 16.4.3, below AT&T may bill the appropriate law enforcement agency for these services under its customary practices. Once CLEC implements CALEA solutions in its switches, CLEC will assume full responsibility for the implementation of court-ordered surveillance on ALS Type II customers.