Issues Related to Bifurcation of Docket No Sample Clauses

Issues Related to Bifurcation of Docket No. 2019-2-E In addition to the issues required to be addressed in this proceeding under S.C. Code Xxx. § 58-41-20, it also is appropriate and necessary for the Commission to address certain issues that previously were presented for consideration in the Company’s 2019 fuel cost proceeding, Docket No. 2019-2-E, but ultimately bifurcated from the decisions reached in that matter. Specifically, prior to the enactment of Act No. 62, DESC’s avoided costs and underlying methodologies were approved in the Company’s annual fuel cost proceeding as provided by S.C. Code Xxx. § 58-27- 865. As part of the Company’s 2019 fuel cost proceeding, DESC proposed to include the updated avoided costs, variable integration costs, and updates to the Net Energy Metering (“NEM”) values in its fuel costs effective with the first billing cycle of May 2019. However, the Commission determined that these issues should be bifurcated from consideration in Docket No. 2019-2-E and would be addressed in a later, appropriate hearing. Order No. 2019-229 at 1; Order No. 2019-43- H at 1. The Commission also determined that DESC’s then-current avoided cost rates and NEM values were to remain the same as those in effect at the time the issues were bifurcated and that, after the Commission held a hearing to consider updates to these rates, these rates and values would be subject to a “true up.” Order No. 2019-43-H at 1. Accordingly, these issues are appropriate for consideration in the above-captioned docket.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Related to Issues Related to Bifurcation of Docket No

  • Certification of Funds; Budget and Fiscal Provisions; Termination in the Event of Non-Appropriation This Agreement is subject to the budget and fiscal provisions of the City’s Charter. Charges will accrue only after prior written authorization certified by the Controller, and the amount of City’s obligation hereunder shall not at any time exceed the amount certified for the purpose and period stated in such advance authorization. This Agreement will terminate without penalty, liability or expense of any kind to City at the end of any fiscal year if funds are not appropriated for the next succeeding fiscal year. If funds are appropriated for a portion of the fiscal year, this Agreement will terminate, without penalty, liability or expense of any kind at the end of the term for which funds are appropriated. City has no obligation to make appropriations for this Agreement in lieu of appropriations for new or other agreements. City budget decisions are subject to the discretion of the Mayor and the Board of Supervisors. Contractor’s assumption of risk of possible non-appropriation is part of the consideration for this Agreement. THIS SECTION CONTROLS AGAINST ANY AND ALL OTHER PROVISIONS OF THIS AGREEMENT.

  • DETERMINATION OF BREACH AND TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT A. Prior to making a determination that the Applicant has failed to comply in any material respect with the terms of this Agreement or to meet any material obligation under this Agreement, the District shall provide the Applicant with a written notice of the facts which it believes have caused the breach of this Agreement, and if cure is possible, the cure proposed by the District. After receipt of the notice, the Applicant shall be given ninety (90) days to present any facts or arguments to the Board of Trustees showing that it is not in breach of its obligations under this Agreement, or that it has cured or undertaken to cure any such breach.

  • Effect of cessation or determination of Agreement 35. (1) On the cessation or determination of this Agreement —

  • Determination of Agreement 29. (1) In any of the following events namely if —

  • Certification Regarding Business with Certain Countries and Organizations Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code, PROVIDER certifies it is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization. PROVIDER acknowledges this Purchase Order may be terminated if this certification is or becomes inaccurate.

  • Contractor Certification regarding Business with Certain Countries and Organizations Pursuant to Subchapter F, Chapter 2252, Texas Government Code], Contractor certifies Contractor is not engaged in business with Iran, Sudan, or a foreign terrorist organization. Contractor acknowledges this Agreement may be terminated and payment withheld if this certification is inaccurate.

  • Termination of Agreement for Unavailability of Authority or Federal Funds It is the intent and understanding of the Parties that this Agreement is contingent upon the availability of Authority or Federal funds or the receipt by the Authority of Federal funds. If Authority funds or Federal funds approved or obligated by the Authority in connection with this Agreement are at any time rendered unavailable, the Authority shall then have the right to terminate this Agreement by the giving of a written notice, the basis, and the effective date of the termination to the Contractor. Should this Agreement be terminated by reason of the unavailability of Authority or Federal funds for the purposes of this Agreement, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, reports, and other materials prepared by the Contractor under this Agreement prior to the effective date of the termination shall be delivered in a format specified by the Authority. In the event of termination under this section for lack of Authority or Federal funds, the Contractor shall be entitled to receive payment for Products and Services incurred under this Agreement prior to the effective date of termination.

  • Certification Regarding Termination of Contract for Non-Compliance (Tex Gov. Code 552.374)

  • Definition of a Grievance A grievance is defined as a dispute or disagreement as to the interpretation or application of the specific terms and conditions of this Agreement.

  • Technical Feasibility of String While ICANN has encouraged and will continue to encourage universal acceptance of all top-­‐level domain strings across the Internet, certain top-­‐level domain strings may encounter difficulty in acceptance by ISPs and webhosters and/or validation by web applications. Registry Operator shall be responsible for ensuring to its satisfaction the technical feasibility of the TLD string prior to entering into this Agreement.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.