Judicial independence Sample Clauses

Judicial independence. Art. 23(3) EPC; the Registrar is included because of his important functions in and for the judicial procedure The European Patent Court, its judges and the Registrar shall enjoy judicial independence. In their decisions, the judges shall not be bound by any instructions and shall comply only with the provisions of this Agreement.
Sample 1Sample 2Sample 3
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Judicial independence. The European Patent Court, its judges and the Registrar shall enjoy judicial independence. In their decisions, the judges shall not be bound by any instructions and shall comply only with the provisions of this Agreement.
Sample 1
Judicial independence. Notwithstanding the Judge’s status as a Town employee for purposes of determining benefits, the authority, if any, of the Town over the Judge shall be limited given the obligation to maintain the independence and integrity of the judiciary. Nevertheless, the Parties agree that the Judge shall comply with all applicable State and Federal laws, and that the Town’s personnel policies and administrative directives shall apply to the Marana Municipal Court and its employees.
Sample 1
Judicial independence. As noted in chapter 1, access to the courts only becomes access to ‘justice’, where judicial adjudication is both independent (of executive influence) and impartial. In Indonesia the perceived lack of judicial impartiality and independence is another significant disincentive for environmental litigants. Probably the most significant problem is that of judicial corruption, the frequent reports of which have contributed toward widely held attitudes of scepticism and suspicion towards judicial institutions. A recent opinion survey by Berlin-based Transparency International found that most Indonesians saw corruption in the courts, rather than in political parties or the police, as the problem needing the most immediate attention in Indonesia.10 Other problems deterring the environmental litigant include lengthy delays in the 8 Nuryanto, "Kendala Xxx Peluang Pendayagunaan Hukum Perdata Xxx Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Dalam Kasus Lingkungan: Refleksi Atas Penangan Kasus Lingkungan", p9. Ths issue of evidence is discussed further below. 9 Freedom of information legislation is currently being considered by a special committee of the national legislature. Ati Nurbaiti, "Freedom of Information Act Should Set Precedent," JŒkŒVtŒ POFt, 18 March 2003. 10 The survey was based on around 1000 persons, and departed from the most common result found in other countries where respondents selected political parties as the institution most needing reform. Xxxx X. Xxxxxx, "Corrupt Courts Seen as Xx’s Greatest Problem," JŒkŒVtŒ POFt, 10 July 2003. administration of justice, particularly in the case of appeals to higher courts. In the Supreme Court alone there is currently a backlog of over 16,000 cases.11
Sample 1

Related to Judicial independence

  • Governing Law; Jurisdiction; Venue This Agreement and all acts and transactions hereunder and all rights and obligations of Silicon and Borrower shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. As a material part of the consideration to Silicon to enter into this Agreement, Borrower (i) agrees that all actions and proceedings relating directly or indirectly to this Agreement shall, at Silicon's option, be litigated in courts located within California, and that the exclusive venue therefor shall be Santa Xxxxx County; (ii) consents to the jurisdiction and venue of any such court and consents to service of process in any such action or proceeding by personal delivery or any other method permitted by law; and (iii) waives any and all rights Borrower may have to object to the jurisdiction of any such court, or to transfer or change the venue of any such action or proceeding.

  • Limited Waiver of Sovereign Immunity Ex Contractu Contractor acknowledges and agrees that Owner is an agency or instrumentality of the State of Georgia, and as such is entitled to the protection of sovereign immunity. As set forth in Article I, Section II, Paragraph IX of the 1983 Georgia Constitution, sovereign immunity is waived “as to any action ex contractu for the breach of any written contract.” Contractor specifically acknowledges the constitutional and contractual requirements that written changes, modifications, and waivers to this Contract must be specifically executed by the Owner as set forth in the Contract Documents. Accordingly, Contractor specifically acknowledges the constitutional prohibitions against claims against Owner based solely upon oral statement, course of conduct, customs of the trade, quasi-contract, quantum meruit, or O.C.G.A § 13-4-4 (mutual departure from contract terms).

  • Program Requirements Provided At No Charge to the Judicial Council A. The Contractor shall provide the following items during the Program at no charge to the Judicial Council:

  • Persons on Probation or Parole Grantee will:

  • Limitation on Judicial Council 's Liability The Judicial Council will not be responsible for loss or damage to any non-Judicial Council equipment or property arising from causes beyond the Judicial Council's control. In any event, the Judicial Council's responsibility for repairs and liability for damages or loss shall be limited to that made necessary by or resulting from the negligent acts or omissions of the Judicial Council or its officers, employees, or agents. The Judicial Council will not be liable for any charges incurred in connection with this Program, or any Judicial Council activities, unless expressly provided for under this Agreement.

  • Administrative and Operating Expenses Charged to the Judicial Council The Judicial Council may reimburse the Contractor for itemized administrative and operating expenses, pursuant to this exhibit, that are reasonable, allowable, and allocable in performing the Work of this Agreement, provided that the Judicial Council first approves such charges via one (1) or more BEO’s that set forth the final details on these items.

  • Governing Law; Venue and Jurisdiction THIS DPA WILL BE GOVERNED BY AND CONSTRUED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAWS OF THE STATE OF THE LEA, WITHOUT REGARD TO CONFLICTS OF LAW PRINCIPLES. EACH PARTY CONSENTS AND SUBMITS TO THE SOLE AND EXCLUSIVE JURISDICTION TO THE STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS FOR THE COUNTY OF THE LEA FOR ANY DISPUTE ARISING OUT OF OR RELATING TO THIS DPA OR THE TRANSACTIONS CONTEMPLATED HEREBY.

  • Law, Jurisdiction, Venue, Waiver of Jury Trial This Agreement shall be interpreted and construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Florida. All parties acknowledge and accept that jurisdiction of any controversies or legal problems arising out of this Agreement, and any action involving the enforcement or interpretation of any rights hereunder, shall be exclusively in the state courts of the Seventeenth Judicial Circuit in Broward County, Florida, and venue for litigation arising out of this Agreement shall be exclusively in such state courts, forsaking any other jurisdiction which either party may claim by virtue of its residency or other jurisdictional device. BY ENTERING INTO THIS AGREEMENT, PURCHASER AND COUNTY HEREBY EXPRESSLY WAIVE ANY RIGHTS EITHER PARTY MAY HAVE TO A TRIAL BY JURY OF ANY CIVIL LITIGATION RELATED TO THIS AGREEMENT. IF A PARTY FAILS TO WITHDRAW A REQUEST FOR A JURY TRIAL IN A LAWSUIT ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT AFTER WRITTEN NOTICE BY THE OTHER PARTY OF VIOLATION OF THIS SECTION, THE PARTY MAKING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL SHALL BE LIABLE FOR THE REASONABLE ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS OF THE OTHER PARTY IN CONTESTING THE REQUEST FOR JURY TRIAL, AND SUCH AMOUNTS SHALL BE AWARDED BY THE COURT IN ADJUDICATING THE MOTION.

  • APPLICABLE LAW, FORUM, VENUE AND JURISDICTION (a) This Agreement shall be construed in accordance with and governed by the laws of the State of Delaware, without regard to the principles of conflicts of law.

  • Governing Law, Jurisdiction and Venue No Waiver of Jury Trial: This Agreement will be governed by the laws of the State of Vermont. Any action or proceeding brought by either the State or the Party in connection with this Agreement shall be brought and enforced in the Superior Court of the State of Vermont, Civil Division, Washington Unit. The Party irrevocably submits to the jurisdiction of this court for any action or proceeding regarding this Agreement. The Party agrees that it must first exhaust any applicable administrative remedies with respect to any cause of action that it may have against the State with regard to its performance under this Agreement. Party agrees that the State shall not be required to submit to binding arbitration or waive its right to a jury trial.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.