Jurisdictional Issues a) The Site is solely directed to individuals residing in the United States. We make no representation that Materials available on or through the Site are appropriate or available for use in other locations. Those who choose to access the Site from other locations do so on their own initiative and at their own risk, and are responsible for compliance with local laws, if and to the extent local laws are applicable. The Software is further subject to United States export controls.
Jurisdictional Issues. PD makes no representation that materials on the Site or the Services are appropriate, lawful or available for use in any location. Those who choose to access or use the Site or Services do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with all applicable Laws.
Jurisdictional Issues. The Site is controlled and/or operated from the United States, and is not intended to subject Company to non-U.S. jurisdiction or laws, except as otherwise expressly stated in this Agreement. The Site may not be appropriate or available for use in some jurisdictions outside of the United States. If you access or use the Site, you do so at your own risk, and you are responsible for complying with all local laws, rules and regulations. We may limit the Site’s availability, in whole or in part, to any person, geographic area or jurisdiction that we choose, at any time and in our sole discretion.
Jurisdictional Issues. We operate and provide the Service from our offices in the United States of America. If you reside outside the U.S., any information you enter into the Service may be transmitted outside your country of residence to the U.S., the data protection laws of which may be less strict than laws in your country of residence. By entering any information into the Service, you acknowledge and agree to the transmission of such information.
Jurisdictional Issues. The Service is controlled and operated by Current from its offices in the State of Illinois. Current makes no representation that materials on the Service are appropriate, lawful or available for use in any locations other than the United States of America. Those who choose to access or use the Service from locations outside the United States of America do so on their own initiative and are responsible for compliance with local laws, if and to the extent local laws are applicable.
Jurisdictional Issues. A. IDENTIFICATION OF AN INDIAN CHILD DHS and the tribes agree that the LSSAs are required under federal and state law to determine whether a child who is at risk of out-of-home placement is an Indian child, and to identify the child=s tribe(s). DHS shall provide training and technical assistance to the LSSAs to achieve compliance with procedures set forth in ICWA, MIFPA, and the Indian Child Welfare Procedures Manual. AIndian Child@ means any unmarried person who is under age eighteen and is (a) either a member of an Indian tribe or (b) eligible for membership in an Indian tribe. (Minn. Stat. ' 257.351, subd. 6). A determination by the tribe that a child is a member or eligible for membership in the tribe is conclusive. (This shall not be construed as an amendment of present tribal enrollment policies) (See Definition 21). Note: Enrollment is the term commonly used to refer to the status of an Indian person as a part of a specific Indian tribe. However, while enrollment is the common means to establishing membership in an Indian tribe, it is not the only means. A person may have membership in a tribe without being enrolled according to criteria established by that tribe. This criteria may be established by tribal ordinance and may be unique to the tribe. A determination by the tribe that a child is a member of or eligible for membership in the tribe is conclusive.
Jurisdictional Issues. Advisor’s Choice makes no representation that the Applications operate (or are legally permitted to operate) in all geographic areas, or that the Information, Applications, or Services are appropriate or available for use in other locations. Accessing the Applications from territories where the Applications or any content or functionality of the Applications or portion thereof are illegal is expressly prohibited. If you choose to access the Applications, you agree and acknowledge that you do so on your own initiative and at your own risk, and that you are solely responsible for compliance with all applicable laws. The Applications are operated from the United States. Advisor’s Choice may transfer, process, or store your information with trusted affiliates, subsidiaries or contractors outside the U.S. in order to provide you with responsive, secure and accurate services. Your agreement to the terms of this Agreement followed by your submission of information in connection with the Applications represents your agreement to this practice. If you do not want your information transferred to or processed or stored in the United States, you should not use the Applications. Use of the Applications by users outside of the United States is at your own risk.
Jurisdictional Issues. BECAUSE SOME STATES OR JURISDICTIONS DO NOT ALLOW THE EXCLUSION OF IMPLIED WARRANTIES OR LIMITATION OF LIABILITY FOR CONSEQUENTIAL OR INCIDENTAL DAMAGES, IN SUCH STATES OR JURISDICTIONS, COMPANY’S LIABILITY SHALL BE LIMITED TO THE EXTENT PERMITTED BY LAW.
Jurisdictional Issues. From the survey: Jurisdictional issues “Get WVDEP enforcement into the game.” “Getting city council and municipal judge to be tough on penalties and enforcement.” “[West Virginia Division of Highways] operations and permitting folks are taking actions that are contrary to the goals and objectives of our MS4 permit. To overcome this, the key will be stronger communication between entities.” In some cases, multiple agencies or levels of government might have joint responsibility for stormwater management. The survey therefore asked about jurisdictional issues. Some MS4s are concerned with jurisdictional issues with railroads. In two cases, railroads are reported not to take care of their inlets in their rights-of-way through MS4 areas. In addition, some MS4s are concerned with jurisdictional issues with the West Virginia Division of Highways. In particular, one MS4 in an interview expressed a concern over the lack of participation from this agency in maintaining the stormwater management systems on its roads within the MS4 area. Jurisdictional issues may also arise where MS4 and city boundaries do not overlap. In this case, it may be difficult to collect fees from areas outside of the city boundary (See Section 3.2). Finally, jurisdictional issues arise with enforcement. The MS4 program essentially envisions joint enforcement of construction sites by MS4s and WVDEP. If WVDEP does not credibly enforce the general construction stormwater permit, it can undermine local MS4 programs’ efforts to work together with other responsible parties. In addition, co-permitting has not yet been used in the state to address jurisdictional overlaps.
Jurisdictional Issues. Regardless of the language used thereon, access to and use of the Services from any jurisdiction where the content, products or services is illegal is strictly prohibited. ec2 makes no representation that the Services are appropriate or available for use in any jurisdictions outside the United States and those who choose to access or use any of the Services from such other jurisdictions do so on their own initiative and at their own risk, and are responsible for compliance with local laws, rules or regulations, including, without limitation, rules about the internet, data, email, or privacy. ec2 reserves the right to limit the availability and quantity, if applicable, of the Services or any other product or service provided by ec2, to any person, geographic area or jurisdiction, at any time and in ec2's sole discretion.
