Klamath Basin Adjudication Sample Clauses

Klamath Basin Adjudication. The Parties support the efforts by PacifiCorp, the Klamath Tribes, Bureau of Indian Affairs, and OWRD to develop a Klamath Basin Adjudication (“KBA”) Settlement Agreement of cases 282 and 286 in the KBA.
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Klamath Basin Adjudication. The Parties agree that upon execution of this AIP, the Parties who are claimants or contestants in the Klamath Basin Adjudication (Adjudication) will support extending the deadline for the filing of exceptions in the Klamath County Circuit Court by 90 days. Nothing in this section or this AIP is intended to state or imply that there is any other limitation on the Parties’ participation in the Adjudication apart from the 90-day extension.

Related to Klamath Basin Adjudication

  • Competent Court The Court of Milan shall have jurisdiction over any dispute arising out of this offer to purchase.

  • Agreement Made in California; Venue The formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. Venue for all litigation relative to the formation, interpretation and performance of this Agreement shall be in San Francisco.

  • LAW APPLICABLE AND COMPETENT COURT 6.1 The Agreement is governed by [insert the national law of the NA].

  • Not Adjudicative It is clearly understood that the Committee is not adjudicative in nature. Unless otherwise agreed to by the parties, decisions of the committee are without prejudice or precedent.

  • THE COURT’S FINAL APPROVAL HEARING The Court will hold a hearing to decide whether to approve the settlement. You may attend and you may ask to speak, but you don’t have to.

  • Defendant’s Guilty Plea The defendant agrees to and hereby does plead guilty to Count One of the indictment charging him with a violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, that is, conspiracy. [A copy of the indictment setting forth the charge in Count One is incorporated by reference.] By entering into this plea agreement, the defendant admits that he knowingly committed this and is in fact guilty of this offense.

  • MAGISTRATE’S COURT JURISDICTION The Parties hereto consent to the jurisdiction of the Magistrates' Court in terms of Section 45 read with Section 28 of the Magistrates’ Court Act of 1944 as amended. Notwithstanding the aforementioned, this shall not preclude either Party from approaching the High Court of South Africa for any relief sought. This Agreement shall further be governed in terms of the law of the Republic of South Africa.

  • Adjudication Where operational requirements permit, the Employer will grant leave with pay to an employee who is:

  • Applicable law and competent court 15.1 The Agreement is governed by law of the Czech Republic.

  • SMALL CLAIMS COURT OPTION YOU MAY CHOOSE TO LITIGATE ANY DISPUTE BETWEEN YOU AND ANY OF US IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT, RATHER THAN IN ARBITRATION, IF THE DISPUTE MEETS ALL REQUIREMENTS TO BE HEARD IN SMALL CLAIMS COURT.

Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.