Land Use Decisions Sample Clauses

The Land Use Decisions clause defines how decisions regarding the use, development, or modification of a property are made under the agreement. It typically outlines which party has authority to approve or propose changes such as construction, zoning applications, or alterations to the property’s permitted uses. This clause ensures that both parties understand their rights and obligations concerning land use, helping to prevent disputes and maintain clarity over who controls or influences property-related decisions.
Land Use Decisions a. Recipient shall obtain all permits, “land use decisions” as that term is defined by ORS 197.015(1) (2020), and any other approvals necessary for Recipient to complete the Project by the Project completion deadline identified in Exhibit A (each a “Land Use Decision” and collectively, “Land Use Decisions”). b. If at any time before the Availability Termination Date identified in Section 1 of this Agreement ODOT concludes, in its sole discretion, that Recipient is unlikely to obtain one or more Land Use Decisions before the Availability Termination Date, ODOT may (i) suspend the further disbursement of Grant Funds upon written notice to Recipient (a “Disbursement Suspension”) and (ii) exercise any of its other rights and remedies under this Agreement, including, without limitation, terminating the Agreement and recovering all Grant Funds previously disbursed to Recipient. c. If after a Disbursement Suspension ODOT concludes, in its sole discretion and based upon additional information or events, that Recipient is likely to timely obtain the Land Use Decision or Decisions that triggered the Disbursement Suspension, ODOT will recommence disbursing Grant Funds as otherwise provided in this Agreement. d. This Section 8 is in addition to, and not in lieu of, ODOT’s rights and remedies under Section
View SourceView Similar (14)
Land Use Decisions. Future Land Use Map amendments, rezonings, and other residential development approvals under the land development regulations that precede the application of school concurrency and do not require a Certificate of School Concurrency.
View SourceView Similar (2)

Related to Land Use Decisions

  • Arbitration Decisions Unless otherwise agreed by the Parties, the arbitrator(s) shall render a decision within ninety (90) Calendar Days of appointment and shall notify the Parties in writing of such decision and the reasons therefor. The arbitrator(s) shall be authorized only to interpret and apply the provisions of this Agreement and shall have no power to modify or change any provision of this Agreement in any manner. The decision of the arbitrator(s) shall be final and binding upon the Parties, and judgment on the award may be entered in any court having jurisdiction. The decision of the arbitrator(s) may be appealed solely on the grounds that the conduct of the arbitrator(s), or the decision itself, violated the standards set forth in the Federal Arbitration Act or the Administrative Dispute Resolution Act. The final decision of the arbitrator must also be filed with FERC if it affects jurisdictional rates, terms and conditions of service, Attachment Facilities, System Upgrade Facilities, or System Deliverability Upgrades.

  • Review by the Association of Procurement Decisions The Procurement Plan shall set forth those contracts which shall be subject to the Association’s Prior Review. All other contracts shall be subject to Post Review by the Association.

  • The Decision If mediation fails, or is not appropriate, and if the decision can be rendered after a short deliberation, the Arbitrator will do so. By meeting first with counsel to explain the framework of the Arbitrator’s decision, the parties are provided with an opportunity to influence the exact terms of resolution. Within the framework of settlement as outlined by the Arbitrator, the parties can work out exact terms which best suit the specifics of the case. Such an opportunity should not be wasted by continuing to argue the merits of the case.