Common use of Late Publication of Rosters Clause in Contracts

Late Publication of Rosters. 4.9.1 The parties acknowledge the importance of ensuring rosters are provided with the agreed minimum notice to ensure RMOs can manage the impact of rostered out-of-hours duties on their personal/family life and commitments. 4.9.2 During the term of this agreement, DHBs and STONZ will monitor and record all instances where an RMO roster was provided with less than the 28 days’ notice required in clause 4.3. 4.9.3 The following escalation pathway will apply: Service or RMO Unit advises: • Designated Executive Lead (based on RMO Unit Reporting line) and • STONZ that the roster has been published with less than the required notice Advice includes any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice AND / OR Members advise STONZ that they have received their roster with less than the required notice XXXXX raises instance with Designated Executive Lead and seeks explanation Service asked to confirm occurrence and identify any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice If this is not the first occasion of recent late publication of this roster, then the Service/RMO Unit will report to the Executive Lead and STONZ and • identify any systemic issues (e.g., resourcing) behind late publication of rosters • identify the steps being taken to address these issues • identify the timeframe for these actions to be completed This report will be provided to SNEF for national recording Report progress in implementing these steps to the Executive Lead and STONZ Should the service again fail to publish roster on time, Executive Lead, STONZ and the Service/RMO Unit will meet to discuss and agree remediation action(s) required SNEF will be advised of this meeting and the agreed outcomes STONZ reserves right to seek compliance

Late Publication of Rosters. 4.9.1 The parties acknowledge the importance of ensuring rosters are provided with the agreed minimum notice to ensure RMOs can manage the impact of rostered out-of-hours duties on their personal/family life and commitments. 4.9.2 During the term of this agreement, DHBs and STONZ will monitor and record all instances where an RMO roster was provided with less than the 28 days’ notice required in clause 4.3. 4.9.3 The following escalation pathway will apply: Service or RMO Unit advises: • Designated Executive Lead (based on RMO Unit Reporting line) and • STONZ that the roster has been published with less than the required notice Advice includes any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice AND / OR Members advise STONZ that they have received their roster with less than the required notice XXXXX STONZ raises instance with Designated Executive Lead and seeks explanation Service asked to confirm occurrence and identify any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice If this is not the first occasion of recent late publication of this roster, then the Service/RMO Unit will report to the Executive Lead and STONZ and • identify any systemic issues (e.g., resourcing) behind late publication of rosters • identify the steps being taken to address these issues • identify the timeframe for these actions to be completed This report will be provided to SNEF for national recording Report progress in implementing these steps to the Executive Lead and STONZ Should the service again fail to publish roster on time, Executive Lead, STONZ and the Service/RMO Unit will meet to discuss and agree remediation action(s) required SNEF will be advised of this meeting and the agreed outcomes STONZ reserves right to seek compliance

Late Publication of Rosters. 4.9.1 The parties acknowledge the importance of ensuring rosters are provided with the agreed minimum notice to ensure RMOs can manage the impact of rostered out-of-hours duties on their personal/family life and commitments. 4.9.2 During the term of this agreement, DHBs Districts and STONZ will monitor and record all instances where an RMO roster was provided with less than the 28 days’ notice required in clause 4.3. 4.9.3 The following escalation pathway will apply: Service or RMO Unit advises: • Designated Executive Lead (based on RMO Unit Reporting line) and • STONZ that the roster has been published with less than the required notice Advice includes any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice AND / OR Members advise STONZ that they have received their roster with less than the required notice XXXXX raises instance with Designated Executive Lead and seeks explanation Service asked to confirm occurrence and identify any issues the service/RMO Unit considers are the reason(s) for the late notice If this is not the first occasion of recent late publication of this roster, then the Service/RMO Unit will report to the Executive Lead and STONZ and • identify any systemic issues (e.g., resourcing) behind late publication of rosters • identify the steps being taken to address these issues • identify the timeframe for these actions to be completed This report will be provided to SNEF for national recording Report progress in implementing these steps to the Executive Lead and STONZ Should the service again fail to publish roster on time, Executive Lead, STONZ and the Service/RMO Unit will meet to discuss and agree remediation action(s) required SNEF will be advised of this meeting and the agreed outcomes STONZ reserves right to seek compliance