LBMP Bus Calculation Method Sample Clauses

LBMP Bus Calculation Method. System marginal costs will be utilized in an ex ante computation to produce Day- Ahead and Real-Time LBMP bus prices using the following equations. The LBMP at bus i can be written as: Where: = LBMP at bus i in $/MWh = the system marginal price at the Reference Bus = Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of losses at bus i relative to the Reference Bus = Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of Congestion at bus i relative to the Reference Bus The Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at any bus i is calculated using the equation: Where: = delivery factor for bus i to the system Reference Bus and: Where: = injection at bus i The Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i is calculated using the equation: Where:
AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
LBMP Bus Calculation Method. System marginal costs will be utilized in an ex ante computation to produce Day-Ahead and Real-Time LBMP bus prices using the following equations. The LBMP at bus i can be written as: Where: = LBMP at bus i in $/MWh = the system marginal price at the Reference Bus = Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of losses at bus i relative to the Reference Bus = Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of Congestion at bus i relative to the Reference Bus The Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at any bus i is calculated using the equation: Where: = delivery factor for bus i to the system Reference Bus and: Where: L = NYCA losses; and = injection at bus i The Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i is calculated using the equation: Where: K = the set of Constraints; = Shift Factor for bus i on Constraint k in the pre- or post- Contingency case which limits flows across that Constraint (the Shift Factor measures the incremental change in flow on Constraint k, expressed in per unit, for an increment of injection at bus i and a corresponding withdrawal at the Reference Bus); and = the Shadow Price of Constraint k expressed in $/MWh, provided however, this Shadow Price shall not exceed the Transmission Shortage Cost. Substituting the equations for and into the first equation yields: LBMPs will be calculated for the Day-Ahead and the Real-Time Markets. In the Day-Ahead Market, the three components of the LBMP at each location will be calculated from the SCUC results and posted for each of the twenty four (24) hours of the next day. The Real-Time LBMPs will be calculated and posted for each execution of RTD.
LBMP Bus Calculation Method. System marginal costs will be utilized in an ex ante computation to produce Day- Ahead and Real-Time LBMP bus prices using the following equations. Where: The LBMP at bus i can be written as: γi = λR + γLi + γCi γi = LBMP at bus i in $/MWh λR = the system marginal price at the Reference Bus γ L = Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal γ C = Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of the equation: Where: γ L = (DFi - 1) λR DFi = delivery factor for bus i to the system Reference Bus and: Where: DFi = ( 1 - ) ∂Pi L = NYCA losses; and Pi = injection at bus i The Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i is calculated using the equation: c  n  γ = − ∑ i  k∈K GFik μk  , except as noted in Sections 17.1.2.2.1 and 17.1.2.3.1 of this Attachment B Where: K = the set of Constraints; GFik = Shift Factor for bus i on Constraint k in the pre- or post- Contingency case which limits flows across that Constraint (the Shift Factor measures the incremental change in flow on Constraint k, expressed in per unit, for an increment of injection at bus i and a corresponding withdrawal at the Reference Bus); and
LBMP Bus Calculation Method. System marginal costs will be utilized in an ex ante computation to produce Day- Ahead and Real-Time LBMP bus prices using the following equations. Where: The LBMP at bus i can be written as: γi = λR + γLi + γCi γi = LBMP at bus i in $/MWh λR = the system marginal price at the Reference Bus γ L = Marginal Losses Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal γ C = Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i which is the marginal cost of the equation: Where: γ L = (DFi - 1) λR DFi = delivery factor for bus i to the system Reference Bus and: Where: DFi = ( 1 - ) ∂Pi L = NYCA losses; and Pi = injection at bus i The Congestion Component of the LBMP at bus i is calculated using the equation:

Related to LBMP Bus Calculation Method

  • Allocation Method (Choose one of a. or b.): a. [ ] All the same. Using the same allocation method as applies to the Signatory Employer under this Election 28. b. [ ] At least one different. Under the following allocation method(s): .

  • Balance Computation Method For all dividend-bearing Accounts, dividends are calculated by the average daily balance method which applies a daily periodic rate to the average daily balance for the average daily balance calculation period. The average daily balance is determined by adding the full amount of the principal in Your Account for each day of the period and dividing that figure by the number of days in the period. Accrual on Noncash Deposits. For dividend-bearing Accounts, dividends will begin to accrue on the business day that You deposit noncash items (e.g. checks) into Your Account.

  • Billing Method 2.6.1 To receive payment for services rendered pursuant to this contract the Contractor shall submit a fully completed invoice for work previously performed to: 2.6.2 At a minimum, the invoice shall detail the following information: 2.6.2.1 Unique invoice number; 2.6.2.2 Contractor’s name, address, and telephone number; 2.6.2.3 Date of invoice and/or billing period; 2.6.2.4 Applicable Contract No.;

  • Payment Methodology The Contractor shall be compensated based on the Service Rates in Attachment for units of service authorized by the Institution in a total amount not to exceed the Contract Maximum Liability established in Section C. 1. The Contractor’s compensation shall be contingent upon the satisfactory completion of units of service or project milestones identified in Attachment B. The Contractor shall submit invoices, in form and substance acceptable to the Institution with all of the necessary supporting documentation, prior to any payment. Such invoices shall be submitted for completed units of service or project milestones for the amount stipulated.

  • Measurement method An isolation resistance test instrument is connected between the live parts and the electrical chassis. The isolation resistance is subsequently measured by applying a DC voltage at least half of the working voltage of the high voltage bus. If the system has several voltage ranges (e.g. because of boost converter) in conductively connected circuit and some of the components cannot withstand the working voltage of the entire circuit, the isolation resistance between those components and the electrical chassis can be measured separately by applying at least half of their own working voltage with those components disconnected.

  • Payment Calculation District shall pay Contractor at a rate of $ per . District shall pay Contractor as described in attached Exhibit A

  • Test method This test is intended to demonstrate the immunity of the vehicle electronic systems. The vehicle shall be subject to electromagnetic fields as described in this annex. The vehicle shall be monitored during the tests. If not otherwise stated in this annex the test shall be performed according to ISO 11451-2.

  • Accounting Method For both financial and tax reporting purposes, the books and records of the Company shall be kept on the accrual method of accounting applied in a consistent manner and shall reflect all Company transactions and be appropriate and adequate for the Company’s business.

  • Pro Forma Calculations (a) Notwithstanding anything to the contrary herein, the Secured Leverage Ratio and the Total Leverage Ratio shall be calculated in the manner prescribed by this Section. (b) In the event that the Parent Borrower or any Restricted Subsidiary incurs, assumes, guarantees, redeems, repays, retires or extinguishes any Indebtedness included in the definitions of Consolidated Secured Debt or Consolidated Total Debt, as the case may be (in each case, other than Indebtedness incurred or repaid under any revolving credit facility in the ordinary course of business for working capital purposes), subsequent to the end of the Test Period for which the Secured Leverage Ratio and the Total Leverage Ratio, as the case may be, is being calculated but prior to or simultaneously with the event for which the calculation of any such ratio is made, then the Secured Leverage Ratio and the Total Leverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma effect to such incurrence, assumption, guarantee, redemption, repayment, retirement or extinguishment of Indebtedness, as if the same had occurred on the last day of the applicable Test Period. (c) For purposes of calculating the Secured Leverage Ratio and the Total Leverage Ratio, Specified Transactions that have been made by the Parent Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries during the applicable Test Period or subsequent to such Test Period and prior to or simultaneously with the event for which the calculation of any such ratio is made shall be calculated on a pro forma basis assuming that all such Specified Transactions (and the change in Consolidated EBITDA resulting therefrom) had occurred on the first day of the applicable Test Period. If since the beginning of any such Test Period any Person that subsequently became a Restricted Subsidiary or was merged, amalgamated or consolidated with or into the Parent Borrower or any of its Restricted Subsidiaries since the beginning of such Test Period shall have made any Specified Transaction that would have required adjustment pursuant to this Section, then the Secured Leverage Ratio and the Total Leverage Ratio shall be calculated giving pro forma effect thereto for such period as if such Specified Transaction occurred at the beginning of the applicable Test Period. (d) Notwithstanding the foregoing, when calculating the Secured Leverage Ratio and Total Leverage Ratio for purposes of determining compliance with Section 7.14 at the end of a Test Period (excluding determinations of compliance with such Section on a pro forma basis pursuant to Sections 2.05(b)(ii), 2.14, 6.14 and 7.04), the definition of “Applicable Rate” and Sections 2.05(b)(i) and 2.05(b)(ii), the events described in Sections 1.10(b) and 1.10(c) above that occurred subsequent to the end of the Test Period shall not be given pro forma effect. (e) Whenever pro forma effect is to be given to a Specified Transaction (other than the Transactions), the pro forma calculations shall be made in good faith by a responsible financial or accounting officer of the Parent Borrower (and may include, for the avoidance of doubt, cost savings, operating expense reductions and synergies resulting from such Specified Transaction (other than the Transactions) which is being given pro forma effect that have been or are expected to be realized and shall be certified in an officers’ certificate by such responsible financial or accounting officer delivered to the Administrative Agent); provided that (A) such amounts are reasonably identifiable and factually supportable, (B) actions to realize such amounts are taken within 12 months after the date of such Specified Transaction, (C) no amounts shall be added pursuant to this clause to the extent duplicative of any amounts that are otherwise added back in computing Consolidated EBITDA with respect to such period. Notwithstanding the foregoing, calculations of the Total Leverage Ratio for purposes of the definition of “Applicable Rate” and Section 2.05(b)(i) and 2.05(b)(ii) shall not include any cost savings, operating expense reductions or synergies that have not been actually realized.

  • Underwriting Methodology The methodology used in underwriting the extension of credit for each Mortgage Loan employs objective mathematical principles which relate the related Mortgagor's income, assets and liabilities to the proposed payment and such underwriting methodology does not rely on the extent of the related Mortgagor's equity in the collateral as the principal determining factor in approving such credit extension. Such underwriting methodology confirmed that at the time of origination (application/approval) the related Mortgagor had a reasonable ability to make timely payments on the Mortgage Loan;

Draft better contracts in just 5 minutes Get the weekly Law Insider newsletter packed with expert videos, webinars, ebooks, and more!