Common use of Limitation on Transactions with Related Persons Clause in Contracts

Limitation on Transactions with Related Persons. (a) Neither Covenant Party will, nor will it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into or suffer to exist any transaction or series of related transactions (including, without limitation, the sale, purchase, exchange or lease of assets, property or services) with any Related Person unless (i) such transaction or series of transactions is on terms that are no less favorable to the relevant Covenant Party or its Subsidiary, as the case may be, than would be available in a comparable transaction with an unrelated third party and (ii) where such transaction or series of transactions involves aggregate consideration (including, without limitation, the assumption of indebtedness) in excess of 7.5% of the aggregate Consolidated Net Worth of the Covenant Parties on a combined basis (without duplication) as of the end of the prior fiscal year, the relevant Covenant Party shall also deliver to each of the D&B Parties and IMS not later than the date of entering into any such transaction, an opinion from an internationally recognized investment banking firm chosen by such Covenant Party as to the fairness of such transaction or series of transactions to such Covenant Party or such Subsidiary from a financial point of view.

Appears in 4 contracts

Samples: Indemnity and Joint Defense Agreement (Moodys Corp /De/), Indemnity and Joint Defense Agreement (Ims Health Inc), Indemnity and Joint Defense Agreement (Dun & Bradstreet Corp/Nw)

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs

Limitation on Transactions with Related Persons. (a) Neither Covenant Party will, nor will it permit any of its Subsidiaries to, directly or indirectly, enter into or suffer to exist any transaction or series of related transactions (including, without limitation, the sale, purchase, exchange or 13 lease of assets, property or services) with any Related Person unless (i) such transaction or series of transactions is on terms that are no less favorable to the relevant Covenant Party or its Subsidiary, as the case may be, than would be available in a comparable transaction with an unrelated third party and (ii) where such transaction or series of transactions involves aggregate consideration (including, without limitation, the assumption of indebtedness) in excess of 7.5% of the aggregate Consolidated Net Worth of the Covenant Parties on a combined basis (without duplication) as of the end of the prior fiscal year, the relevant Covenant Party shall also deliver to each of the D&B Parties and IMS not later than the date of entering into any such transaction, an opinion from an internationally recognized investment banking firm chosen by such Covenant Party as to the fairness of such transaction or series of transactions to such Covenant Party or such Subsidiary from a financial point of view.

Appears in 1 contract

Samples: Indemnity and Joint Defense Agreement

AutoNDA by SimpleDocs
Time is Money Join Law Insider Premium to draft better contracts faster.