Monetary Penalties. (a) The Executive Director has the authority to enter into a settlement agreement on
7 (1) The monetary penalty order is no longer subject to any means of judicial review.
8 (2) Three collection demand letters, each sent at a minimum of 30 day intervals, were
11 (3) Staff made reasonable collection efforts by:
12 (A) Seeking offsets from payments due to the debtor from the Franchise State Tax Board
Monetary Penalties. The Corporation and the Foundation shall each have the authority to impose monetary penalties against Member in connection with violations of their respective governing documents. Monetary penalties imposed by the Corporation shall be levied in accordance with the Corporation’s policies, rules and regulations. Monetary penalties imposed by the Foundation shall be levied in accordance with the Foundation’s policies and procedures.
Monetary Penalties. If fees, fines, penalties, or costs are claimed or assessed against EPE or Seller by any Governmental Authority that are in whole or in part contributed to or due to noncompliance by the other Party with this Agreement, any requirements of law, any permit or contractual obligation, the other Party shall promptly reimburse EPE or Seller for related monetary penalties to the extent of such contribution or attribution.
Monetary Penalties. (a) DDS may impose on a Provider a civil monetary penalty not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500) for each violation of these standards.
(1) DDS may file suit to collect a civil monetary penalty assessed pursuant to these standards if the Provider does not pay the civil monetary penalty within sixty (60) calendar days from the date DDS provides written notice to the Provider of the imposition of the civil monetary penalty.
(2) DDS may file suit in Pulaski County Circuit Court or the circuit court of any county in which the Provider is located.
Monetary Penalties. 2.1. For any monetary penalty imposed pursuant to this SLA, the following provisions shall apply:
2.1.1. Monetary penalty(ies) shall be imposed and accrue for incidents of noncompliance.
2.1.2. Whenever feasible, the State shall give the Contractor reasonable notice of the State’s intention to impose monetary penalty(ies).
2.1.3. The State will consider external factors that may impact the Contractor’s noncompliance, including the fault of the State.
2.1.4. Monetary penalty(ies) shall not apply to the extent that the parties agree in good faith that penalty(ies) should not be imposed.
2.1.5. The Contractor shall make payment of monetary penalty(ies) to the State by the due date required in the notice(s) of assessment.
2.1.6. The State may require a Corrective Action Plan (CAP) to be developed, approved by the State, and implemented within agreed upon timeframes, for any incident of noncompliance.
2.1.7. The Contractor shall list, document, and track all potential Operational Incidents specified in this SLA and demonstrate if the Contractor is compliant with Contract and Task Order requirements. The Contractor shall submit the Operational Incidents Tracking to AHCCCS as specified in Contract Exhibit C.
2.2. The monetary penalties specified in this SLA:
2.2.1. May be cumulative such that one or more penalties may be assessed and imposed under one or more individual section below for the same or different concurrent failure(s) within a Calendar Year.
2.2.2. Cumulative penalties are not to exceed the contract or task order invoice amount for the month in which the penalty occurs [excluding CMS Issued Monetary Penalty(ies) for Noncompliance]. Penalties may be incurred across consecutive months if corrective action is not taken to bring the service criteria or deliverable into acceptable performance.
Monetary Penalties. Health Plan may impose monetary sanctions for performance deficiencies or issues, in the same manner as provided in law, regulation and the Medi-Cal Agreement for non-performance or non-compliance of contractual or regulatory requirements, which may be deducted from payments at the discretion of Health Plan;
Monetary Penalties. If the LME does not adhere to the reporting and data submission requirements and deadlines specified within this Contract, DMA may impose monetary penalties. DMA shall communicate the penalties in writing to the LME and DMA’s fiscal agent. All financial reports prepared and submitted by the LME subsequent to the imposition of penalties shall reflect the penalties. DMA shall have the right to assess monetary penalties pursuant to SOW Section 11.2: Timeliness of Provider Payments and Section 9.3: Reporting Requirements.
Monetary Penalties. If the MCO does not adhere to the reporting and data submission requirements and deadlines specified within this Contract, DMA may impose monetary penalties. DMA shall communicate the penalties in writing to the MCO and DMA’s fiscal agent. All financial reports prepared and submitted by the MCO subsequent to the imposition of penalties shall reflect the penalties. DMA shall have the right to assess monetary penalties pursuant to SOW Section 11.2: Timeliness of Provider Payments and Section 9.3: Reporting Requirements.
Monetary Penalties. Ripple Labs Inc. and XRP II, LLC (formerly known as XRP Fund II, LLC) agree to forfeit $450,000.00 to the Office of the United States Attorney for the Northern District of California (“U.S. Attorney’s Office”). Ripple Labs and XRP II further agree to pay a civil money penalty to FinCEN in the amount of $700,000.00, within 30 days of the date of this agreement. Payment of the forfeiture to the U.S. Attorney’s Office shall be deemed creditable toward FinCEN’s civil money penalty.
Monetary Penalties. The common parent (or principal operating com- pany) and all reporting corporations that join in the filing of a consolidated Form 5472 are liable jointly and sever- ally for penalties for failure to file Form 5472 and for failure to mantain records under section 6038A(d) and § 1.6038A–4(e). See § 1.1502–77(a) regard- ing the scope of agency of the common parent corporation.
