Common use of Name of Respondent Clause in Contracts

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 RFQ #: RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing – Respondent will perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC 20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Xxxxxxx Management Solutions, Inc Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 ManagePath - Leasing Portfolio Database Service Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 RFQ #: RFP #: IFB #: ■ SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing – Respondent will perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment (per TAC 20.285(d)(5)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ IT Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Xxxxxxx Xxxxx & Xxxxx-Xxxxxxx Joint Venture Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 TBW Program Management Services Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 RFQ #: RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing – Meet the Goal Other Services - Respondent will perform entire contract has met the 26.0 % Meet the Goal with own employees, material, supplies and equipment HUB Participation (per TAC 20.285(d)(5Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract No. 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Xxxxxxx Consultants, Inc. Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 ENV IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 002x2x-0x6x2x-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 x0x0x0 RFQ #: 3x0x3x-3x-x0x3x7x3x8303-1-01119 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing 100% HUB Participation – Respondent will perform entire contract with own employees, material, supplies and equipment utilize only Texas Certified HUBs for all determined scopes (per TAC 20.285(d)(5Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(ii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Xxxxxxx Environmental Services, Inc. = 15% Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants ERC Environmental & Construction Service Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 ENV IDIQ Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000Req.000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECTProject/WO #: 002X2-000X0X61X-0000 Assignment No. 8 X00X0X RFQ #: 3x0303-1-01119 N/A N/A x3x-x3x-x0x3x7x3x9x RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing Meet the Goal Professional Services – Respondent will perform entire contract has met the 23.7 % Meet the Goal with own employees, material, supplies and equipment HUB Participation (per TAC 20.285(d)(5Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxx X. Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Approved for HUB Compliance- attached is the approved HSP that reflects this request. - jcp Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Abatement/Remediation Services = 10% Laboratory Services = 5% Site Assessments = 10% Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Xxxxxxxxx Civil Inc. Name of Project: CMT on site Design-Build Services for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on goingTexas Border Infrastructure (TBI) Assign7 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 783383 RFQ #: 000-0-00000 RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: 1 GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing – Meet the Goal Building Construction - Respondent will perform entire contract has met the 21.1 % Meet the Goal with own employees, material, supplies and equipment HUB Participation (per TAC 20.285(d)(5Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Amendment to increase contract: The total compensation for this Agreement is One Hundred Sixty-Two Million, Two Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand and NO/100 ($162,265,000.00) which includes the Stipulated Sum of Nine Hundred Ninety-Five Thousand and NO/100 Dollars ($995,000.00) for design and preconstruction services for alignment RGV09A-1 and the TFC controlled allowance of One Hundred Sixty-One Million Two Hundred Seventy Thousand and NO/100 Dollars ($161,270,000.00) to be applied at TFC’s sole discretion to DB’s Stipulated Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO ■ N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:6/2021

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants Central Texas Refuse Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 Single Stream Pickup, Transportation and Recycling Services Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: PO #: PROJECT/WO #: RFQ #: RFP #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 00-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 RFQ #: RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: GMP#: POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing – Meet the Goal Building Construction - Respondent will perform entire contract has met the 21.1 % Meet the Goal with own employees, material, supplies and equipment HUB Participation (per TAC 20.285(d)(5Rules 20.285(d)(1)(D)(iii)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Xxxxxx' XxxxxxXxxx: 2021.11.22 11:50:00 -06'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? YES ■ NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES ■ NO N/A be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: YES ■ NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 DocuSign Envelope ID: 25FE793D-FB1C-4BFC-B330-20FD1CE0778D TFC IDIQ Contract No. 00-000-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) D 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES NO N/A ■ respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments:

Name of Respondent. Terracon Consultants XX Xxxx Construction Name of Project: CMT on site for the Cap Cap-Com Mall&Garage(on going) Assign7 Cup&Utility Tunnel-Pkg 3 -Addl Work - GMP 6 Contract # 00-000-000 Req #: 000-0-00000 PO #: 000-0-0000 PROJECT/WO #: 0017-000-0000 Assignment No. 8 008A-8040 RFQ #: RFP #: IFB #: SERVICES AE: CMR RC IDIQ Assignment #: 7 Amendment #: GMP#: 6 POCN#: TFC HUB Coordinator has reviewed the above referenced HSP response to this solicitation and finds that the HSP: ■ complies with does not comply with Method Used to Achieving HUB Compliance: HSP – Self Performing Solicitation GFE – Respondent will perform entire contract with own employeesis compliant to requirement of solicitation process to 3 HUBs, material, supplies 2 Trade Organizations and equipment allowed 7 working days for a response. (per TAC 20.285(d)(520.285(d)(D)(i)) Print/Type Name: TFC HUB Coordinator/Date: Xxxxxxx Xxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Digitally signed by Xxxxxx' Xxxxxx Date: 2022.09.20 15:55:21 -05'00' Section II: Does the respondent intend to subcontract? ■ YES NO N/A Instructions: If “Yes,” do not proceed to the following questions. If “No,” proceed to the next question. Comments: GMP 6 - Addition of scopes to support completion of CapCom -1601 Congress - see attached TFC PM justification email see sub justification for non-solicited scopes GFE docs on file in HUB drive Did the respondent verify that no subcontractors would YES NO N/A ■ be used in the performance of the work (verification must be provided on the form prescribed in the solicitation). Section III: Respondents who DO intend to subcontract: ■ YES NO 1. Did the respondent divide the work into reasonable portions, consistent with prudent industry practices (Identified the areas of subcontracting)? Comments: Revised 6/2021 TFC IDIQ Contract 00DocuSign EnvelopeTFC ID:ContractED31C009-00039F2-40EE-9463-DF43440FD49E18-152-000 - Assignment No. 8 - EXHIBIT B Am Page 2 of 2 Texas Facilities Commission (TFC) - HUB Program EVALUATION OF RESPONDENT’S HUB SUBCONTRACTING PLAN (HSP) 2. Did the respondent provide notice to HUBs of the work that the YES ■ NO N/A respondent intends to subcontract, in accordance with 1 T.A.C. Section 111.14? Comments: 3. Did the respondent include an executed Mentor Protégé Agreement YES NO N/A ■ (per Section 2161.065 Government Code), registered with TPASS? Does the HUB subcontracting plan identify the area(s) of subcontracting the protégé will perform? (Submission of a protégé as a subcontractor constitutes a good faith effort for the particular area to be subcontracted with the protégé). Comments: