Common use of No appearance is necessary Clause in Contracts

No appearance is necessary. The motion requests relief from the automatic stay to complete an eviction. Using a bankruptcy case to delay an eviction is not appropriate. See, e.g., In re Xxxxx, 105 X.X. 00, 00 & 00 (Xxxxx. X.X. Cal. 1989) (describing cases filed to delay an eviction as “abusive” and designed to “delay improperly the landlord from obtaining possession of his property.”). Accordingly, for this reason and the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court hereby finds that sufficient grounds exist to grant the motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(1) and 362(d)(2) with the following relief: 10:00 AM

No appearance is necessary. The motion requests relief from the automatic stay to complete an eviction. Using a bankruptcy case to delay an eviction is not appropriate. See, e.g., In re Xxxxx, 105 X.X. 00, 00 & 00 (Xxxxx. X.X. Cal. 1989) (describing cases filed to delay an eviction as “abusive” and designed to “delay improperly the landlord from obtaining possession of his property.”). Accordingly, for this reason and the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court hereby finds that sufficient grounds exist to grant the motion 10:00 AM CONT... Xxxxxxxx X Xxxxxx and Xxxxxxx X Xxxxxx Chapter 7 pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(1) and 362(d)(2) with the following relief: 10:00 AM:

No appearance is necessary. The motion requests relief from the automatic stay to complete an eviction. Using a bankruptcy case to delay an eviction is not appropriate. See, e.g., In re Xxxxx, 105 X.X. 00B.R. 50, 00 53 & 00 55 (XxxxxBankr. X.X. C.D. Cal. 1989) (describing cases filed to delay an eviction as “abusive” and designed to “delay improperly the landlord from obtaining possession of his property.”). Accordingly, for this reason and the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court hereby finds that sufficient grounds exist to grant the motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(1) and 362(d)(2) with the following relief: 10:00 AMAM CONT...

No appearance is necessary. The motion requests relief from the automatic stay to complete an eviction. Using a bankruptcy case to delay an eviction is not appropriate. See, e.g., In re Xxxxx, 105 X.X. 00B.R. 50, 00 53 & 00 55 (XxxxxBankr. X.X. C.D. Cal. 1989) (describing cases filed to delay an eviction as “abusive” and designed to “delay improperly the landlord from obtaining possession of his property.”). Accordingly, for this reason and the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court hereby finds that sufficient grounds exist to grant the motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(1) and 362(d)(2) with the following relief: 10:00 AMAM CONT...

No appearance is necessary. The motion requests relief from the automatic stay to complete an eviction. Using a bankruptcy case to delay an eviction is not appropriate. See, e.g., In re Xxxxx, 105 X.X. 00, 00 & 00 (Xxxxx. X.X. Cal. 1989) (describing cases filed to delay an eviction as “abusive” and designed to “delay improperly the landlord from obtaining possession of his property.”). Accordingly, for this reason and the reasons set forth in the motion, the Court hereby finds that sufficient grounds exist to grant the motion pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §§ 362(d)(1) and 362(d)(2) with the following relief: 10:00 AMAM CONT...