Common use of Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation Clause in Contracts

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County New York, 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. 8/30/2013 Sch. 2-2 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX US Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach XX-00000- XXX Xxxxxx of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RERe/MAX Max fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20169/20/2016 Xxxxxx and Xxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. U.S. District Court, Northern District of Georgia 1:17-cv-07181- TCB Lender Liability Putative, Georgia class action, alleges Quicken Loans improperly collected interest payments on FHA loans when the loans were paid in full between 1985 and 2015. Specifically, plaintiffs allege that regardless of when the loan was paid in full, Quicken Loans collected interest through the end of the month. Although the 5/19/2017 Sch. 2-3 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served collection of a full month of interest when the loan is paid in full is allowed, plaintiffs allege Quicken Loans failed to provide a specific FHA approved form with the payoff statement. Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx-Xxxxxx v. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx of Michigan 2:17-cv-12818 Consumer Protection Class action lawsuit alleging that QL violated the Equal Credit Reporting Act (ECOA) and the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA) by not providing the Plaintiff with statutorily required disclosures. 09/13/2017

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Schedule 3-1 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX US Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach XX-00000- XXX Xxxxxx of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20169/20/2016 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-xx-00000 TCPA Plaintiff alleges violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL used prerecorded messages when calling her, (b) QL called her using an autodialer, and (c) QL called her despite the fact that her number was on the National DNC list. XxXxxxxx claims that she never provided express written consent for QL to contact her using any of the methods described above. 12/23/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. 4/17/2015 Schedule 12(c)-1 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. America, et al. 4/23/2015 Xxxxx Xxxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx of New Jersey 14-cv-5912 TCPA Putative class action claims violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for making telemarketing calls to a cell phone with automatic dialer systems without consent and for violations of do not call. 9/30/2014 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 1514-cv-81386 cv-61116 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 5/11/2014 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Schedule 12(c)-2 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, 8/30/2013 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations (solely as Trustee of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (aGSR Mortgage Loan Trust 2007-OA1) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxUnited States Court of Appeals, Xxxxxxxx 002nd Circuit 13-XX-00000 CMA- cv-6482 Breach of Contract Breach Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services providedrepurchase loans when required. 9/20/201610/18/2013

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Nature of Date Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. 4/17/2015 The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Nature of Date Case Title Court Case Number Action Description of Claims Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. 4/23/2015 The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx v. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81250 TCPA Plaintiff alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cellphones without consent. 10/12/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20168/30/2013

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Nature of Date Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Nature of Date Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class Putative class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state West Virginia consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeownerthe client’s estimated values value to appraisers; (2) charging illegal or unauthorized loan discount fee; and (3) not providing copies of signed documents at closing. In June 2016, an order was entered granting class certification and summary judgment against QL on twoclaims. QL is pursuing all appeal options. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Quicken Loans Inc. vs. Re/Max US District Court, Colorado 1:16-cv-02696- RM-NYM Breach of Contract Quicken Loans sued Re/Max for, among other things, fraudulent inducement, unjust enrichment, promissory estoppel and breach of contract. These claims all stem from a failed partnership whereby Re/Max was to provide marketing services to Quicken Loans. 9/8/2016 Nature of Date Case Title Court Case Number Action Description of Claims Served Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX US Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach XX-00000- XXX Xxxxxx of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. 4/17/2015 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served **Case dismissed. Plaintiff, Quicken Loans Inc. to appeal. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. **The case is currently stayed. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81250 TCPA Plaintiff alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cellphones without consent. 10/12/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class Putative class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeowner’s estimated values value to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b2) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC listcharging illegal or unauthorized loan discount fee; and (d3) QL failed to timely opt her outnot providing copies of signed documents at closing. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20166/25/2012

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. ** Plaintiff, Quicken Loans Inc. appealed. 4/17/2015 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81250 TCPA Plaintiff alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cellphones without consent. 10/12/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class Putative class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state West Virginia consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeownerthe client’s estimated values value to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b2) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC listcharging illegal or unauthorized loan discount fee; and (d3) not providing copies of signed documents at closing. In June 2016, an order was entered granting class certification and summary judgment against QL failed to timely opt her outon two claims. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services providedQL is pursuing all appeal options. 9/20/20166/25/2012

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Schedule 4-1 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx XxxxXxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX US Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach XX-00000- XXX Xxxxxx of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20169/20/2016 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Xxxxxx XxXxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-xx-00000 TCPA Plaintiff alleges violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL used prerecorded messages when calling her, (b) QL called her using an autodialer, and (c) QL called her despite the fact that her number was on the National DNC list. XxXxxxxx claims that she never provided express written consent for QL to contact her using any of the methods described above. 12/23/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. ** Plaintiff, Quicken Loans Inc. appealed. 4/17/2015 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81250 TCPA Putative class action alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cellphones without consent. 10/12/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state West Virginia consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeownerthe client’s estimated values value to appraisers; (2) charging illegal or unauthorized fees; and (3) not providing copies of signed documents at closing. In June 2016, an order was entered granting class certification and summary judgment against QL on the first claim. QL is pursuing all appeal options. 6/25/2012 Xxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 2:15-cv-09380- SVW-AGR TCPA Putative class action alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumers Protection Act (“TCPA”) by (a) calling consumers after they revoked their consent to be called using an auto-dialer and (b) calling consumers who had registered their phone number on the national Do-Not-Call Registry. 12/4/2015 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Consumers Protection Act by claiming(“TCPA”) by: (a) QL called her, without express consent, calling consumers on her landline their residential phone using a prerecorded messagemessage without the consumer’s prior express consent; (b) QL calling consumers after they revoked their consent to be called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC listusing an auto- dialer; (c) QL called her calling consumers using an auto-dialer without first having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC listplace; and & (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00calling consumers who had registered their phone number on the national Do-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/2016Not-Call Registry 9/8/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 16-cv-14050 False Claims Act The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class Putative class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state West Virginia consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeownerthe client’s estimated values value to appraisers; (2) charging illegal or unauthorized loan discount fee; and (3) not providing copies of signed documents at closing. In June 2016, an order was entered granting class certification and summary judgment against QL on two claims. QL is pursuing all appeal options. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- cv-02605-SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract and that Quicken Loans failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/20169/8/2016

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. America, et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 1615-cv-14050 cv-1 1408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. ** Plaintiff, Quicken Loans Inc. appealed. 4/17/2015 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. 4/23/2015 Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81386 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 Xxxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 15-cv-81250 TCPA Plaintiff alleges Quicken Loans violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by using prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cellphones without consent. 10/12/2015 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 Xxxxxxx Xxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11-c-428 Lender Liability Class Putative class action lawsuit complaint alleging violation of state West Virginia consumer protection statutes for (1) providing homeownerthe client’s estimated values value to appraisers; (2) charging illegal or unauthorized loan discount fee; and (3) not providing copies of signed documents at closing. In June 2016, an order was entered granting class certification and summary judgment against QL on two claims. QL is pursuing all appeal options. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- cv-02605-SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (a) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC Xxxxx Xxxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxxxxx 2:15-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms cv-09380-SVW-AGR Lender Liability Plaintiff alleges violations of the contract and that Quicken Loans Telephone Consumers Protection Act ("TCPA") by claiming QL failed to perform its obligations, namely, properly opt her out of communications after she requested no further calls be made to make payment for services providedher residential phone. 9/20/2016Waived

Non-Ordinary Course of Business Litigation. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx XxxxxAmerica, Xxxxxxx Xxxxxxxxet al. US District Court, Xxxxxxxx 16Eastern District, Michigan 15-cv-14050 cv-11408 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. 4/17/2015 The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwritingrequirementsunderwriting requirements. *See United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served United States of America vs. Quicken Loans Inc. United Xxxxxx Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx xx Xxxxxxxx 00-0000 False Claims Act Quicken Loans sued HUD, DOJ and governmental entities or actors for violation of the APA, breach of contract, and violation of constitutional due process rights, and seeks an injunction and declaratory judgments that Quicken Loans did not violate FHA guidelines. 4/23/2015 The U.S. claims that QL violated the False Claims Act by falsely certifying that FHA loans made by Quicken Loans met FHA underwriting requirements. *See Quicken Loans Inc. vs. United States of America, et al. Xxxxx Xxxxx, et al. vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx of New Jersey 14-cv-5912 TCPA Putative class action claims violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act for making telemarketing calls to a cell phone with automatic dialer systems without consent and for violations of do not call. 9/30/2014 Xxxxxxxxxxx Xxxx Xxxxxx vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxxxxx 1514-cv-81386 cv-61116 TCPA Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming QL used prerecorded voice messaging and automatic dialers for marketing purposes on cell phones without consent. 10/8/2015 5/11/2014 Residential Funding Company vs. Quicken Loans Inc., et al. District Court, Hennepin County, Minnesota 14-cv-3111 Breach of Contract Plaintiff asserts claims for repurchase or indemnification based on origination and underwriting errors. 12/16/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, solely as Trustee of the Harborview Mortgage Loan Trust (2007-7) vs. Quicken Loans Inc. Supreme Court, New York County County, New York, York 13-653048 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx Mac, claims that Quicken Loans breached a contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and warranties and failed to repurchase loans when required. * Notice of Appeal filed by Plaintiff, 8/30/2013 Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. 8/30/2013 , (solely as Trustee of the GSR Mortgage Loan Trust United States Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 13-cv-6482 Breach of Contract Plaintiff-trustee, on behalf of Xxxxxxx XxxxMac, et al. vs. claims that Quicken Loans Inc., et al. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx Xxxxxxxx, Xxxx Xxxxxxxx 11breached a 10/18/2013 Case Title Court Case Number Nature of Action Description of Claims Date Served 2007-c-428 Lender Liability Class action lawsuit alleging violation of state consumer protection statutes for providing homeowner’s estimated values to appraisers. 6/25/2012 Xxxxxx Xxxx vs. Quicken Loans United States District Court Middle District of Florida 8:16-cv-02605- SDM-TBM Lender Liability Putative class action alleges violations of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act by claiming: (aOA1) QL called her, without express consent, on her landline using a prerecorded message; (b) QL called her, without express consent, even though her number was on the national DNC list; (c) QL called her without having procedures in place for maintaining an internal DNC list; and (d) QL failed to timely opt her out. 9/8/2016 Re/Max, LLC vs. Quicken Loans Inc. XX Xxxxxxxx Xxxxx, Xxxxxxxx 00-XX-00000 CMA- Breach of Contract Breach of contract claim alleging that RE/MAX fulfilled their duties under the terms of the contract to sell loans consistent with certain representations and that Quicken Loans warranties and failed to perform its obligations, namely, to make payment for services provided. 9/20/2016repurchase loans when required.