Common use of PANEL DECISION Clause in Contracts

PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following: (a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows: (1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material. (2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. (3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. (b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because: (1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment; (2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position; (3) Of other reason (state reason). The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment. (c) The Panel denies the appeal.

PANEL DECISION. The Panel Decision referenced in Section Three above shall be by majority vote, and may be any of the following:be (a) The Panel votes in favor of reclassification, and proceeds as follows:; (1) The Chairperson shall forward to the Commissioner of Administrative Services (through the Chief Human Resources Officer (Chief HRO)) a recommendation for reclassification, along with a complete record of grievance material. (2) The Chief HRO shall then appoint an HR Professional experienced experience in classification to review the grievance material, and to convene a brief meeting with the entire Reclass Panel, to discuss their recommendation. (3) The HR Professional appointed by the Chief HRO shall review the Panel’s recommendation, and, on behalf of the Chief HRO, sustain or deny the grievance. Such decision shall be final and binding upon the parties. (b) The Panel sustains the appeal and payment for service services in the higher class is authorized, consistent with Section Six, but reclassification is not recommended because: (1) Existing merit system conditions do not permit appointment; (2) The organizational structure and/or staffing conditions do not support the additional position; (3) Of other reason (state reason). The Department of Administrative Services will review the work experience of the employee, to validate that s/he meets the minimum experience and training requirements for the higher-level classification, which is a condition of TSHC payment. (c) The Panel denies the appeal.