Peer Review Report. Submitted to Participating Teacher, Evaluator and Joint Committee on Teacher Evaluation by April 15th Participating Teacher: Consulting Teacher: Date: School: Assignment: Description of Assistance Provided by the Consulting Teacher
Peer Review Report. The Peer Review Report is the outcome of the work of the PRT. The report should enable both accreditation organisations to make an accreditation decision substantiated with evidence from the review. Both organisations accept a joint report, as long as all standards from both frameworks are addressed and it is clearly indicated which sections address specific (EADI/IAC) standards. The NVAO assessment framework prescribes the need for a judgment per standard (meets the standard, partially meets the standard, or does not meet the standard) and per programme (positive, conditionally positive, negative). For NVAO to decide on accreditation the PRT needs to state and motivate these judgments in the report. In addition, a substantive summary of the report needs to be added to the report. This is not the case for the EADI/IAC criteria. The PRT's task is to provide relevant information to the EADI/IAC Accreditation Council. The draft report is sent to the institution. The institution is given a term of two weeks to respond to any factual inaccuracies in the report, whereupon the chair of the PRT endorses the report after all PRT members have approved its contents. Subsequently, the PRT submits its final report and recommendations to the EADI/IAC and NVAO. The report will be published on the NVAO and the EADI/IAC websites for any stakeholder to access and read.
Peer Review Report. Contractor shall submit a copy of the most recent report of the external peer review in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, including the peer reviewer’s comment letter and firm’s response. (Government Auditing Standard 5.79, 5.80, 2 CFR 200.509 (a))
