Personal Hearing Sample Clauses
Personal Hearing. A personal Hearing in the matter was conducted on 04.11.2019, which was attended by ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇. ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, on behalf of the Appellant, wherein they reiterated the written submissions previously filed before us. The aforesaid hearing was also attended by Shri P.P. Sawant in the capacity of the Jurisdictional Officer in the instant appeal matter, who also reiterated the written submissions, filed before us.
Personal Hearing. The Authorized representatives of the unit namely ▇. ▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, Advocate attended the personal hearing held on 05.01.
Personal Hearing. The applicant was granted opportunity for personal hearing on 19.04.2023 through Virtual Mode. Shri. ▇▇▇▇▇.N.L, Chartered Accountant represented the applicant. The applicant filed detailed statement of facts along with the application. He requested to issue the ruling on the basis of the submissions made by them in the application and during the personal hearing.
Personal Hearing. The applicant was granted opportunity for personal hearing on 20.07.2022.
Personal Hearing. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇, CA appeared for personal hearing through virtual mode (Video Conferencing) on 30- 6-21. On being specifically asked as to whether the applicant was supplying subject services i.e. carrying out R&D activities by only working on the goods provided by the Hilti Aktiengesellschaft and whether they were providing any other independent services besides this, he clarified that the subject services supplied by the applicant was only as a result of analysis carried out on goods provided by the Hilti Aktiengesellschaft, after which a detailed report was submitted to the said recipient.
Personal Hearing. Personal hearing granted on 18-2-22 was attended by ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇, CA and they reiterated the submission.
Personal Hearing. 6.1. The applicant was granted an opportunity for a personal hearing on 05.11.2021. ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇ and ▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇ ▇▇▇▇▇▇▇▇ represented the applicant in the personal hearing. They submitted additional documents and reiterated the contentions made in the application and requested to issue a ruling based on the submissions in the application.