Predator Control/Long-term Monitoring L0, 2004 License term $20K Sample Clauses

Predator Control/Long-term Monitoring L0, 2004 License term $20K yr, 2004 $100K/yr If license is delayed, $20K/yr beginning 2004 until final license is received (see 19.2.2) 19.3 USFS enhancement funds deposited L0, 2004 X $8.0 Million total (see SA) 19.3 USFS annual funding deposited L0, 2004 X $250,000/yr 19.1/19.3 Federal and State Deposited Funds Paid Out L0 X See SA 19.5 Pre-license Enhancement Funding Paid Out 2002 X $350,000/yr (see SA) 1. Where measure is a construction activity, the date given corresponds with completion of construction. Where measure is ongoing in nature (e.g., funding) date given corresponds with initiation of action. 2. Where measure is date certain, both a calendar date and an anniversary of the New License are provided, with the earliest of the two controlling. Where measure is license-dependent, the New License anniversary indicates when measure is to be completed. SA means to be implemented upon the Effective Date of the Settlement Agreement. 3. License-dependent means the measure is to be implemented only at the stated time after the New License becomes final, as that phrase is defined in the Settlement Agreement. Part 1, Table 1: Performance Standards for Soda Springs Dam Fish Screens 1. Design and build the screen to achieve injury and mortality rates contained in the first horizontal row of the table. 2. Test the screen hydraulically and balance the screen to optimize performance. 3. Test the screen biologically. If test results indicate that injury and mortality rates associated with the screen fall within the range of values contained in the first horizontal row of the table, no additional modifications to the screen are required. 4. If test results indicate that injury and mortality rates fall within the range of values contained in the second horizontal row of the table, undertake minor additional modifications to reduce injury and mortality rates. The objective of such modifications is to achieve the injury and mortality rates contained in the first horizontal row of the table. However, if minor additional modifications fail to achieve the injury and mortality rates contained in the first horizontal row of the table, but injury and mortality rates fall within the range of values contained in the second horizontal row of the table, no major modifications are required. 5. If test results indicate that injury and mortality rates associated with the screen fall within the range of values contained in the third horizontal row of the table, undertake major operational or structural mo...