Common use of Priority Consideration and Re-Promotion Clause in Contracts

Priority Consideration and Re-Promotion. a. Before advertising a position, the Human Resources office (HRO) will provide the selecting official with names of individuals entitled to re-promotion or priority consideration. Individuals will be referred in the following order: 1. APF employees under grade or pay retention due to demotion for reasons not stemming from personal cause or request and NAF employees on the Re-employment Priority List. Such employees will be afforded first offer for re-promotion to positions from which they were downgraded unless there are justifiable reasons for non-selection. 2. Activity employees who failed to receive proper consideration for promotion in a prior case due to a procedural, regulatory or program violation. Eligibility will terminate when selected, when referred for bona fide consideration or at the end of the one-year period from the determination of eligibility. The eligibility period may be extended for one additional year if no bona fide referral has occurred during the first year of eligibility. If an employee is not selected under priority consideration and the employee applies for and is certified as one of the best-qualified under competitive promotion procedures for the same position, the selecting official must state reasons, in writing, if he or she does not then select the employee.

Priority Consideration and Re-Promotion. a. Before advertising a position, the Human Resources office (HRO) will provide the selecting official with names of individuals entitled to re-promotion or priority consideration. Individuals will be referred in the following order: 1. APF employees under grade or pay retention due to demotion for reasons not stemming from personal cause or request and NAF employees on the Re-Re- employment Priority List. Such employees will be afforded first offer for re-re- promotion to positions from which they were downgraded unless there are justifiable reasons for non-selection. 2. Activity employees who failed to receive proper consideration for promotion in a prior case due to a procedural, regulatory or program violation. Eligibility will terminate when selected, when referred for bona fide consideration or at the end of the one-year period from the determination of eligibility. The eligibility period may be extended for one additional year if no bona fide referral has occurred during the first year of eligibility. If an employee is not selected under priority consideration and the employee applies for and is certified as one of the best-qualified under competitive promotion procedures for the same position, the selecting official must state reasons, in writing, if he or she does not then select the employee.

Priority Consideration and Re-Promotion. a. Before advertising requesting a positioncertificate, the Human Resources office Office (HRO) will provide the selecting official with names a list of individuals entitled to re-promotion or priority consideration. Individuals will be referred in the following order: (1. APF ) Activity employees under grade or pay retention due to demotion for reasons not stemming from personal cause or request and NAF employees on the Re-employment Priority Listrequest. Such employees will be afforded first offer for re-re- promotion to positions from which they were downgraded unless there are justifiable reasons for non-selection. If the employee is not provided first offer of the position, the reason(s) will be provided to the employee in writing. (2. ) Activity employees who failed to receive proper consideration for promotion in a prior case due to a procedural, regulatory or program violation. Eligibility will terminate when selected, when referred for bona fide consideration or at the end of the one-year period from the determination of eligibility. The eligibility period may be extended for one additional year if no bona fide referral has occurred during the first year of eligibility. . b. If an employee is not selected under priority consideration and the employee applies for and is certified as one of the best-qualified under competitive promotion procedures for the same position, the selecting official must state reasons, in writing, if he or she does not then select the employee.