Project Delivery Method Determination Clause Samples
Project Delivery Method Determination. On January 23, 2019 the MoDOT Southwest District held a Project Delivery Determination Workshop to aid in the selection of a project delivery method that best fit the project requirements. Design-build and design-bid-build were evaluated, and the opportunities and obstacles for each delivery method were analyzed and compared based on the draft goals of the project: Goal #1: Deliver the project on budget – control quantities. Goal #2: Deliver the project on time and make the connection to I-49. Goal #3: Deliver a project that safely handles truck traffic (29%). Goal #4: Deliver a long lasting transportation facility that minimizes environmental and RW impacts. The workshop findings indicated that design-build and design-bid-build were both appropriate delivery methods for the project. It was ultimately decided to use design-bid-build with alternative technical concepts due to the following factors: • Right of way for the project had already been acquired. • A significant number of utilities had already been relocated. • Design plans for the project were nearly complete and had been “on the shelf” since 2009 (although a significant amount of pay items needed to be updated and the cross sections needed to be reproduced in the current version of MoDOT’s design software). • Lack of preliminary engineering funding to cover design-build stipends. • Lack of staff availability for design-build procurement. • A re-evaluation of the Environmental Impact Statement was underway utilizing the current alignment and right of way footprint. • Short timeframe required for plans delivery (ten-and-a-half months from late January to early December 2019) to meet the Grant commitment. • ATCs offered a solution for contractors to add innovation and cost savings to the project prior to award.
Project Delivery Method Determination. A team of Southwest District Staff met and performed a Project Delivery Determination (PDD) on Route 86 Table Rock Lake Bridge (J7S3194) on October 25th, 2019. Based on the analysis of the opportunities and obstacles of each project deliver method over eight factors, as well as performing a high-level risk assessment, both Design-Build and Design-Bid-Build are appropriate for this project. After considering the findings of the PDD workshop report from this meeting the District decided to select a Design-Bid-Build with Alternative Technical Concepts provision.
