Project Formulation. SEH will complete the project and grant pre-application documentation, environmental review submittals, cost breakdowns, and eligibility determinations for the approved scope of work. Work Element 2: Preliminary Design
Project Formulation. While negotiation of a project timeframe has clear budget implications for a donor, realism about the practicability should prevail. Less research outputs would have been more appropriate for a 18 months’ project time frame and should be considered for any future research project. Alternatively a longer time frame of 24 months for the same level of research outputs could be considered The ILO should always try to fully reflect its poverty focus in research projects, regardless of the donor. Where this is not possible, project strategies on how to make research findings relevant to LDCs should be developed and implemented
Project Formulation. The Glengoffe Community Development Committee is an umbrella organization whose mission is to facilitate a sustainable development in the community. In keeping with this mission the organization has generated a comprehensive development plan. This plan is used to guide development activities in the community. In the series of consultation with residents, NGOs Agencies and other key stakeholders in and around the community, as well as during monthly meeting it was ascertained that among the list of problems that warrants immediate attention is the severe land degradation that the community continues to experience annually. While this problem has always existed the general consensus among residents is that the problem has exacerbated since the past five years.
Project Formulation. Describe how the project was formulated, both in terms of the overall concept and in terms of its components. Describe the roles of the proponent and the role of the community, if separate.
Project Formulation. PRODUCT: Development of project work scope and cost estimate Task 1.1 - Project Scope Preparation A scope of services will be prepared describing each item of work required for completion of the Impose and use PFC application. Each task within the scope of services will be evaluated to determine the appropriate level of man-hours and personnel classifications to complete each individual task. Estimates will also be prepared for direct expenses such as travel, subsistence, materials, printing and any other necessary cost related to the project. Coordination of the work scope will be conducted with the Sponsor.
Project Formulation. This element consist of examination of the site to ensure its compatibility with the proposed improvement, preparation all necessary documents for grant application, coordination with GDOT to establish design criteria and project scope; Geotechnical services and surveying; conduct a pre design conference on site with representatives from GDOT; project site visits, and submitting of 7460 to FAA;
Project Formulation. 4.2.2.1 According to the basic PCR data, there was no Bank identification mission; it is noted however that the project was already a part of the Government’s new education policy in the context of the Emergency Recovery and Reconstruction Programme (ERRP). The project was to respond to the effects of war and drought, which had resulted into damage of school facilities and displacement of school age-children. The project was prepared in 1988 by a joint ADF/UNESCO team for the basic education components, while Government prepared the technical and vocational training component with the assistance of UNDP/UNIDO agencies. The appraisal document was based on an ADF/UNESCO preparation report. The PCR is however silent on the adequacy/completeness of the project preparatory work, especially as the appraisal report included hard conditions which seemed to reflect inadequacies in project preparation. The PCR states that the conditions appeared appropriate at the time of appraisal as they were inspired by experiences in implementing earlier projects – even though the PCR does not establish a clear relationship between this project and the earlier one – in particular regarding the achievements of the first project. The PCR also does not give the date of receipt of Government’s request for project financing. In general, the topic is satisfactorily covered in the report.
Project Formulation. Task 1.1 – Environmental Determination – SEH will complete coordination and completion of the Categorical Exclusion documentation and submit to FAA for review. It is expected that this will entail a request to the FAA for a Simple Written Record. Work Element 2: Specification Package Review Elements of the specification development will be prepared per applicable FAA Advisory Circulars (AC), Orders, Regulations and Policy Memorandums by the City of Minot. The consultant shall provide review services to include review of technical specifications, bidding documents, Buy American certification requirements and FAA eligibility reviews. Specific tasks included with this work element include:
Project Formulation. SEH will complete the project and grant pre-application documentation, environmental review submittals, cost breakdowns, and eligibility determinations for the approved scope of work. Work Element 2: Engineer’s Design Report Task 2.1 – Engineer’s Design Report – Complete Engineer’s Design Report according to FAA requirements and submit to FAA for review at 60%. The report will be completed with the following sections: Scope of Work – SEH will develop a brief narrative of the work scope, delineation of eligible/ineligible work items, any unique or unusual situations, and historical background on the proposed project. Three meetings are estimated with sponsor and/or FAA to review the project. Photographs – SEH will coordinate with MOT staff to capture photographs of representative areas of existing site conditions of the pavement. The photographs will be included within the report. Applicable AIP Standards – All applicable AIP standards will be referenced in the report by FAA Advisory Circulars. Airport Operational Safety Considerations – SEH will develop a preliminary Construction Safety and Phasing Plan (CSPP), and confirm with sponsor and FAA, to evaluate proposed phasing and sequencing, construction limits, haul routes, contractor staging areas, and anticipated impacts to airport users. All airport facilities, including approach procedures and navigational aids, will be evaluated for potential impacts due to construction. Special attention will be taken for the impacts at intersections, such as Taxiway D and Runway 8/26 and the connector from the GA apron to Taxiway B. Construction Safety and Phasing Plan and Safety Plan Narrative will be delivered to FAA for review and comment during EDR review process. As part of the EDR completion and CSPP submittal, a list of local, airport, and FDC NOTAMS will be drafted. Pavement Design – SEH will utilize the geotechnical information obtained during preliminary efforts, most recent PCI report date, and project as-built information to evaluate the current pavement condition and proposed design criteria. It is anticipated that varying mill depths and overlay thicknesses may be utilized for each unique pavement section and will be analyzed throughout design. Where applicable, FAARfield analysis will be completed to validate the pavement design. Pavement thickness will be verified with FAA and the airport based on current fleet mix. Drainage Design – Drainage away from taxiway pavement and intersections will be analyze...
